Three-Dimensional Component Alignment and Functional Outcome in Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Two Navigation Systems

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1285-1290

  Harvie, Paul ^a   Sloan, Karen ^a   Beaver, Richard J ^a  

^a ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Articular surface mounted; Computer navigation; Perth ct protocol; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79959215661     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Australian National Joint Replacement Registry. Computer Assisted Surgery in Primary Total Knee Replacement between 2006 and 2008 Request ID: 447;2010.
2. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 6th Annual Report 2009, 72. NJR Centre, Hemel Hempstead.
3. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., et al. Computer-assited knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86-B:72.
4. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised trial comparing computer-navigation and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(3):282.
5. Seon J.K., Song E.K. Functional impact of navigation-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005, 28(10):1251.
6. Choong P., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assited total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):560.
7. Bauwens K., Mattes G., Wich M., et al. Navigated total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89-A(2):261.
8. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assited total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(8):1097.
9. Spencer J.M., Chauhan S.K., Sloan K., et al. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89-B(4):477.
10. American Medical Association Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment 1995, 549. 5th ed.
11. Insall J.N., Dore L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13.
12. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes in antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatology 1988, 15:1833.
13. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 26-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Medical Care 1992, 30:473.
14. Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Dewey J. How to score version 2 of the SF-36 health survey 2000, Quality Metric Incorporated, Lincoln (RI).
15. Dong H., Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006, 22:191.
16. Kalairajah Y., Cossey A.J., Verrall G.M., et al. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 88-B:198.
17. Kim Y.H., Kim J.S., Choi Y., et al. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91-A:14.
18. Stuhlberg S.D., Yaffe M.D., Koo S.S. Computer-assited surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88-A(Suppl. 4):47.
19. Kalairajah Y., Simpson D., Cossey A.J., et al. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer assited surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87-B:1480.
20. Bierbaum B.E., Callaghan J.J., Galante J.O., et al. An analysis of blood management in patients having total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999, 81-A(1):2.
21. Morawa L.G., Manley M.T., Edidin A.A., et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic monitored events during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 331:192.
22. Church J.S., Scadden J.E., Gupta R.R., et al. Embolic phenomena during computer-assisted and conventional toal knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 89-B:481.
23. Ooi L.H., Lo N.N., Yeo S.J., et al. Does computer-assisted surgical navigation total knee arthroplasty reduce venous thromboembolism compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty?. Singapore Medical Journal 2008, 49(8):610.
24. Stuhlberg S.D., Loan P., Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacements: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A(Suppl. 2):90.
25. Arima J., Whiteside L.A., McCarthy D.S., et al. Femoral rotation alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee: a technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995, 77-A:1331.
26. Chauhan S.K., Clark G.W., Lloyd S., et al. Computer-assisted total knee replacement: a controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86-B(6):818.
27. Stryker. Knee Navigation: Operative Technique. 2008;2.