Validity and responsiveness of the knee society clinical rating system in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 83, Issue 12, 2001, Pages

  Lingard, E A ^a   Katz, J N ^a   Wright, R J ^a   Wright, E A ^a   Sledge, C B ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE SOCIETY CLINICAL RATING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SHORT FORM-36; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITY OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

EID: 0035214156     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200112000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis
2. Patient outcomes following unicompartmental or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis
3. Kinematic total knee arthroplasty: A 10- to 14-year prospective follow-up review
4. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis. A ten-year follow-up study
5. Global rating systems used in assessing knee arthroplasty outcomes
6. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system
7. What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement?
8. Validation study of the WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinicallyimportant patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis
9. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee
10. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the medical outcomes study
11. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs
12. The MOS 36-item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups
13. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection
14. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery
15. Measuring the success of treatment in patient terms
16. Predicting quality-of-life outcomes following total joint arthroplastypy. Limitations of the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire
17. Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty
18. Self administered patient satisfaction scale for joint replacement arthroplasty
19. Measuring relevant change: An emerging challenge in rheumatologic clinical trials
20. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation
21. Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders
22. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement
23. The need for a dual rating system in total knee arthroplasty
24. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery
25. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials
26. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness
27. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) development of a self-administered outcome measure