Computational methods for high resolution prediction and refinement of protein structures

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 177-184

  Friesner, Richard A ^a   Abel, Robert ^b   Goldfeld, Dahlia A ^a   Miller, Edward B ^a   Murrett, Colleen S ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b SCHRÖDINGER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY TRANSFER; HUMAN; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SOLVATION; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED;

EID: 84878564386     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.01.010     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Moult J., Fidelis K., Kryshtafovych A., Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round IX. Proteins 2011, 79(Suppl 1):1-5.
2. Kryshtafovych A., Fidelis K., Moult J. CASP9 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins 2011, 79(Suppl 1):196-207.
3. Oshiro C., Bradley E.K., Eksterowicz J., Evensen E., Lamb M.L., Lanctot J.K., Putta S., Stanton R., Grootenhuis P.D.J. Performance of 3D-database molecular docking studies into homology models. J Med Chem 2004, 47:764-767.
4. Enyedy I.J., Lee S.-L., Kuo A.H., Dickson R.B., Lin C.-Y., Wang S. Structure-based approach for the discovery of bis-benzamidines as novel inhibitors of matriptase. J Med Chem 2001, 44:1349-1355.
5. Selzer P.M., Chen X., Chan V.J., Cheng M., Kenyon G.L., Kuntz I.D., Sakanari J.A., Cohen F.E., McKerrow J.H. Leishmania major: molecular modeling of cysteine proteases and prediction of new nonpeptide inhibitors. Exp Parasitol 1997, 87:212-221.
6. Que X., Brinen L.S., Perkins P., Herdman S., Hirata K., Torian B.E., Rubin H., McKerrow J.H., Reed S.L. Cysteine proteinases from distinct cellular compartments are recruited to phagocytic vesicles by Entamoeba histolytica. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2002, 119:23-32.
7. Thiel K.A. Structure-aided drug design's next generation. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:513-519.
8. Kuroda D., Shirai H., Jacobson M.P., Nakamura H. Computer-aided antibody design. Protein Eng Des Sel 2012, 25:507-522.
9. Jacobson M., Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling and its applications to drug discovery. Annu Rep Med Chem 2004, 39:259-276.
10. Hou S., Li B., Wang L., Qian W., Zhang D., Hong X., Wang H., Guo Y. Humanization of an anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody by complementarity-determining region grafting based on computer-assisted molecular modelling. J Biochem 2008, 144:115-120.
11. Staelens S., Desmet J., Ngo T.H., Vauterin S., Pareyn I., Barbeaux P., Van Rompaey I., Stassen J.-M., Deckmyn H., Vanhoorelbeke K. Humanization by variable domain resurfacing and grafting on a human IgG4, using a new approach for determination of non-human like surface accessible framework residues based on homology modelling of variable domains. Mol Immunol 2006, 43:1243-1257.
12. Zheng L., Manetsch R., Woggon W.-D., Baumann U., Reymond J.-L. Mechanistic study of proton transfer and hysteresis in catalytic antibody 16E7 by site-directed mutagenesis and homology modeling. Bioorg Med Chem 2005, 13:1021-1029.
13. Skolnick J. In quest of an empirical potential for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006, 16:166-171.
14. Raval A., Piana S., Eastwood M.P., Dror R.O., Shaw D.E. Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2012, 80:2071-2079.
15. Lindorff-Larsen K., Piana S., Dror R.O., Shaw D.E. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 2011, 334:517-520.
16. Rohl C.A., Strauss C.E.M., Chivian D., Baker D. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta. Proteins 2004, 55:656-677.
17. Xiang Z., Soto C.S., Honig B. Evaluating conformational free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:7432-7437.
18. Fiser A., Do R.K., Sali A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 2000, 9:1753-1773.
19. Bruccoleri R.E., Karplus M. Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling. Biopolymers 1987, 26:137-168.
20. Shenkin P.S., Yarmush D.L., Fine R.M., Wang H.J., Levinthal C. Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformation. I. Ensembles of random conformations for ringlike structures. Biopolymers 1987, 26:2053-2085.
21. Tomasi J., Persico M. Molecular interactions in solution: an overview of methods based on continuous distributions of the solvent. Chem Rev 1994, 94:2027-2094.
22. Nicholls A., Honig B. A rapid finite difference algorithm, utilizing successive over-relaxation to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. J Comput Chem 1991, 12:435-445.
23. Cortis C.M., Friesner R.A. Numerical solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation using tetrahedral finite-element meshes. J Comput Chem 1997, 18:1591-1608.
24. Bashford D., Case D.A. Generalized Born models of macromolecular solvation effects. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2000, 51:129-152.
25. Still W.C., Tempczyk A., Hawley R.C., Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1990, 112:6127-6129.
26. Dominy B.N., Brooks C.L. Development of a generalized Born model parametrization for proteins and nucleic acids. J Phys Chem B 1999, 103:3765-3773.
27. Jorgensen W.L., Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc 1988, 110:1657-1666.
28. Kaminski G.A., Friesner R.A., Tirado-Rives J., Jorgensen W.L. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 2001, 105:6474-6487.
29. Jorgensen W.L., Maxwell D.S., Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1996, 118:11225-11236.
30. Li J., Abel R., Zhu K., Cao Y., Zhao S., Friesner R.A. The VSGB 2.0 model: a next generation energy model for high resolution protein structure modeling. Proteins 2011, 79:2794-2812.
31. Ghosh A., Rapp C.C.S., Friesner R.R.A. Generalized Born model based on a surface integral formulation. J Phys Chem B 1998, 102:10983-10990.
32. Yu Z., Jacobson M.P., Friesner R.A. What role do surfaces play in GB models? A new-generation of surface-generalized Born model based on a novel gaussian surface for biomolecules. J Comput Chem 2006, 27:72-89.
33. Qiu D., Shenkin P.S., Hollinger F.P., Still W.C. The GB/SA continuum model for solvation. A fast analytical method for the calculation of approximate Born radii. J Phys Chem A 1997, 5639:3005-3014.
34. Zhu K., Shirts M.R., Friesner R.A. Improved methods for side chain and loop predictions via the protein local optimization program: variable dielectric model for implicitly improving the treatment of polarization effects. J Chem Theory Comput 2007, 3:2108-2119.
35. Verdonk M.L., Cole J.C., Hartshorn M.J., Murray C.W., Taylor R.D. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins 2003, 52:609-623.
36. Zhu K., Pincus D.L., Zhao S., Friesner R.A. Long loop prediction using the protein local optimization program. Proteins 2006, 65:438-452.
37. Jacobson M.P., Pincus D.L., Rapp C.S., Day T.J.F., Honig B., Shaw D.E., Friesner R.A. A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins 2004, 55:351-367.
38. Zhao S., Zhu K., Li J., Friesner R.A. Progress in super long loop prediction. Proteins 2011, 79:2920-2935.
39. Sellers B.D., Zhu K., Zhao S., Friesner R.A., Jacobson M.P. Toward better refinement of comparative models: predicting loops in inexact environments. Proteins 2008, 72:959-971.
40. Miller E.B., Murrett C.S., Zhu K., Zhao S., Goldfeld D.A., Bylund J., Friesner R.A. Prediction of Long Loops with Embedded Secondary Structure using the Protein Local Optimization Program. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2013, 9:1846-1864.
41. Jones D.T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999, 292:195-202.
42. Pollastri G., Przybylski D., Rost B., Baldi P. Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 2002, 47:228-235.
43. Pirovano W., Heringa J. Protein secondary structure prediction. Methods Mol Biol 2010, 609:327-348.
44. Dorsam R.T., Gutkind J.S. G-protein-coupled receptors and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2007, 7:79-94.
45. Evers A., Klabunde T. Structure-based drug discovery using GPCR homology modeling: successful virtual screening for antagonists of the alpha1A adrenergic receptor. J Med Chem 2005, 48:1088-1097.
46. de Graaf C., Foata N., Engkvist O., Rognan D. Molecular modeling of the second extracellular loop of G-protein coupled receptors and its implication on structure-based virtual screening. Proteins 2008, 71:599-620.
47. Pierce K.L., Premont R.T., Lefkowitz R.J. Seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002, 3:639-650.
48. Rosenbaum D.M., Rasmussen S.G.F., Kobilka B.K. The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 2009, 459:356-363.
49. Kobilka B., Schertler G.F.X. New G-protein-coupled receptor crystal structures: insights and limitations. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2008, 29:79-83.
50. Goldfeld D.A., Zhu K., Beuming T., Friesner R.A. Successful prediction of the intra- and extracellular loops of four G-protein-coupled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:8275-8280.
51. Goldfeld D.A., Zhu K., Beuming T., Friesner R.A. Loop prediction for a gpcr homology model: algorithms and results-loop prediction for a GPCR homology model. Proteins 2013, 81:214-228.