Genre-based curricula: Multilingual academic literacy in content and language integrated learning

International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 375-388

  Lorenzo, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

Author keywords

CLIL; genres; language across the curriculum; language in history; literacy; multilingual education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878547997     PISSN: 13670050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777391     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Achugar, M. 2009. Designing Environments for Teaching and Learning History in Multilingual Contexts. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 6 (1): 39 - 62. doi: 10.1080/15427580802679377
2. Adger, C. T., Snow, C. and Christian, D. 2003. What Teachers Need to Know about Language, Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
3. Adwan, S., and D. Bar-on. 2003. Learning Each Other's Historical Narrative: Palestinians and Israelis. Beit Jallah: Prime Publication. http://vispo.com/PRIME/leohn1.pdf
4. Azevedo, C. 2010. Will the Implementation of Reading to Learn in Stockholm Schools Accelerate Literacy Learning for Disadvantage Students and Close the Achievement Gap? Multilingual Research Institute: A report on school-based Action Research. http://www.readingtolearn.com.au/images/pdf/October/stockholm%20r2l%20report.pdf
5. Beacco, J. C. 2010. Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling Necessary for Learning/Teaching History. An Approach with Reference Points. Brussels: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Source2010_ForumGeneva/1_LIS-History2010_en.pdf
6. Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings, London: Longman.
7. Bruce, I. 2008. Academic Writing and Genre, London: Continuum.
8. Cammarata, L. and Tedick, D. J. 2012. Balancing Content and Language in Instruction: The Experience of Immersion Teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96: 251 - 269. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.x
9. Christie, F. and Maton, K. 2011. Disciplinarity: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives, London: Continuum.
10. Coffin, C. 2006. " Reconstructing Personal Time as Collective Time: Learning the Discourse of History ". In Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches, Edited by: Whittaker, R., O'Donnell, M. and McCabe, A. 15 - 45. London: Continuum.
11. Coonan, C. M. 2007. Insider Views of the CLIL Class Through Teacher Self Observation-Introspection. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10: 625 - 646. doi: 10.2167/beb463.0
12. Crossley, S. A., McCarthy, P., Louwerse, M. and McNamara, D. 2007. A Linguistic Analysis of Simplified and Authentic Texts. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (1): 15 - 30. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00507.x
13. Dalton-Puffer, C., and U. Smit 2007. Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
14. Dalton-Puffer, C., T. Nikula, and U. Smit 2010. Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Eggin, S. and Martin, J. 2003. El contexto como género: una perspectiva lingüística funcional [Context as Genre: A Functional Linguistic Perspective]. Signos, 36 (1): 85 - 105. doi: 10.4067/S0718-09342003005400005
16. Eurydice. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: European Commission. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Source2010_ForumGeneva/1_LIS-History2010_en.pdf
17. Feez, S. 2001. Text-Based Syllabus Design, Sydney: Macquaire University.
18. Goméz, A., and D. Arcos. 2007. " Plan de mejora de la competencia lingüística: Elaboración del proyecto lingüístico de centro [Improving Language Competence: School Genre Maps]." Avances en Supervisión Educativa. Revista de la Asociación de Inspectores de Educación de España 7, 13 - 27. http://www.adide.org/revista/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=224&Itemid=49
19. Halliday, M. and Hasan, R. 2006. " Retrospective on SFL and Literacy ". In Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches, Edited by: Whittaker, R., O'Donnell, M. and McCabe, A. 15 - 45. London: Continuum.
20. Hüttner, J. I. 2007. Academic Writing in a Foreign Language: An Extended Genre Analysis of Student Texts. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
21. Hyland, K. 2002. Genre: Language, Context and Literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22 (1): 113 - 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000065
22. Hyland, K. 2004. Genre and Second Language Writing, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
23. Instituto Cervantes. 2006. Plan curricular del Instituto Cervantes [Instituto Cervantes Official Curriculum]. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
24. Jäppinen, A.-K. 2005. Thinking and Content Learning of Mathematics and Science as Cognitional Development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching Through a Foreign Language in Finland. Language and Education, 19 (2): 147 - 168. doi: 10.1080/09500780508668671
25. Johns, A., 2002. Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. Mawhaw: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Junta de Andalucía. 2008. El Curriculum integrado de las lenguas [A Language Integrated Curriculum]. Sevilla: Consejería de Educación. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/averroes/impe/web/contenido?pag=/contenidos/B/InnovacionEInvestigacion/ProyectosInnovadores/Plurilinguismo/Seccion/CVIntegrado/cil
27. Junta de Analucía. 2010. Proyecto lingüístico de centro [A School Genre Map]. Sevilla: Consejería de Educación. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/educacion/webportal/web/proyecto-linguistico-centro
28. Junta de Andalucía. 2011. Biblioteca de materiales AICLE [The CLIL Lesson Archives]. Sevilla. Consejería de Educación. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/educacion/nav/contenido.jsp?pag=/Contenidos/OEE/programasinternacionales/AICLE/materiales
29. Kress, G. 2007. " Meaning, Learning and Representation in a Social Semiotic Approach to Multimodal Communication ". In Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches, Edited by: Whittaker, R., O'Donnell, M. and McCabe, A. 16 - 37. London: Continuum.
30. Lemke, J. L. 2002. " Multimedia Genres for Scientific Education and Science Literacy ". In Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages, Edited by: Scheleppegrell, M. J. and Colombi, C. 21 - 44. Mawhaw: Erlbaum.
31. Llinares, A. and Morton, T. 2010. Historical Explanations as Situated Practice in Content and Language Integrated Learning. Classroom Discourse, 1 (1): 46 - 65. doi: 10.1080/19463011003750681
32. Lorenzo, F. 2007. An Analytical Framework of Language Integration in L2-Content Based Courses. Language and Education, 22: 502 - 515. doi: 10.2167/le708.0
33. Lorenzo, F. 2008. Instructional Discourse in Bilingual Settings: An Empirical Study of Linguistic Adjustments in Content and Language Integrated Learning. Language Learning Journal, 36 (1): 21 - 33. doi: 10.1080/09571730801988470
34. Lorenzo, F. and Moore, P. 2010. " On the Natural Emergence of Language Structures in CLIL. Towards a Theory of European Educational Bilingualism ". In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, Edited by: Dalton-Puffer, C-, Nikula, T. and Smit, U. 23 - 38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Lorenzo, F., Casal, S. and Moore, P. 2009. The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European Education: Key Findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections Evaluation Project. Applied Linguistics, 31: 418 - 442. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp041
36. Lorenzo, F., Moore, P. and Casal, S. 2011. On Complexity in Bilingual Research: The Causes, Effects, and Breadth of Content and Language Integrated Learning: A reply to Bruton. Applied Linguistics, 32: 450 - 455. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr025
37. Lu, X. 2010. Automatic Analysis of Syntactic Complexity in Second Language Writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15: 474 - 496. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
38. Macken-Horarik, M. 2002. " Something to Shoot for: A Systemic Functional Approach to Teaching Genre in Secondary School Science ". In Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives, Edited by: John, A. 64 - 79. Mawhaw: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. 2003. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause, London: Continuum.
40. Martin, J. R., Maton, K. and Matruglio, E. 2010. Historical Cosmologies: Epistemology and Axiology in Australian Secondary School History Discourse. Signos, 43: 433 - 463. doi: 10.4067/S0718-09342010000500003
41. Mohan, B. 1986. Language and Content, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
42. Mohan, B. and Beckett, G. H. 2003. A Functional Approach to Research on Content-Based Language Learning: Recasts in Causal Explanations. The Modern Language Journal, 87: 421 - 432. doi: 10.1111/1540-4781.00199
43. Mohan, B. and Slater, T. 2005. A Functional Perspective on the Critical 'theory/Practice' Relation in Teaching Language and Science. Linguistics and Education, 16 (2): 151 - 172. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.008
44. Moore, P. 2011. Collaborative Interaction in Turn-Taking: A Comparative Study of European Bilingual (CLIL) and Mainstream (MS) Foreign Language Learners in Early Secondary Education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14: 531 - 549. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2010.537741
45. Musumeci, D. 1996. Teacher-Learner Negotiation in Content-Based Instruction: Communication at Cross-Purposes. Applied Linguistics, 17: 286 - 325. doi: 10.1093/applin/17.3.286
46. OECD. 2010. PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do - Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/browseit/9810071E.PDF.
47. Organismo Autónomo de Programas Europeos. 2011. Proyecto Lingüístico de Centro [School Language Genre Map]. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación. http://proyectolinguisticodecentro.es/
48. Oteíza, T. 2009. Solidaridad ideológica en el discurso de la historia: Tensión entre orientaciones monoglósicas y heteroglósicas [Ideological Solidarity in the Historical Discourse: Tension Between Monoglossic and Heteroglossic Orientations]. Revista Signos, 42: 219 - 244.
49. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2009. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from Research in Europe, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
50. Salmon, W. N. 2010. Formal Idioms and Action: Toward a Grammar of Genres. Language and Communication, 30: 211 - 224. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2010.01.002
51. Scheleppegrell, M. J. and Colombi, M. C. 2002. Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages, Mawhaw: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Swales, J. M. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Thomson, C., and M. Hari. 2006. " Implementing the Genre Approach in a South African School." In Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches, R. Whittaker, M. O'Donnell, and A. McCabe 56 - 72. London: Continuum.
55. Van Dijk, T. and Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, New York: Academic Press.
56. Vázquez, G. 2007. " Models of CLIL: An Evaluation of its Status Drawing on the German Experience." A Critical Report on the Limits, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, Número Monográfico, 95 - 112.
57. Vollmer, H. J. 2006. Language Across the Curriculum. Brussels: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Prague07_LangCom_VollmerEd_EN.doc.
58. Zwiers, J. 2006. Integrating Academic Language, Thinking, and Content: Learning Scaffolds for Non-Native Speakers in the Middle Grades. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5: 317 - 332. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.005