Ideological solidarity in the historical discourse: Tension between monoglossic and heteroglossic orientations;Solidaridad ideológica en el discurso de la historia: Tensión entre orientaciones monoglósicas y heteroglósicas

Revista Signos

Volumn 42, Issue 70, 2009, Pages 219-244

  Oteíza, Teresa ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Appraisal analysis; Discourse of history; History textbooks; Ideology; Voice

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349492122     PISSN: 00350451     EISSN: 07180934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Achugar, M. & Schleppegrell, M. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 16, 298-318.
2. Augoustinos, M., Lecouteur, A. & Soyland, J. (2002). Self-sufficient arguments in political rhetoric: Constructing reconciliation and apologizing to the stolen generations. Discourse & Society, 13(1), 105-142.
3. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. En M. Holquist (Ed.) y traducción de C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Bakhtin, M. (1985). Estética de la creación verbal. Coyoacán: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
5. Benke, G. & Wodak, R. (2003). The discursive construction of individual memories: How Austrian "Wehrmacht" soldiers remember WWII. En J. Martin & R. Wodak (Eds.), Re/reading the past. Critical and functional perspectives on time and value (pp. 115-138). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
6. Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into Secondary School History. En F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the work place and school (pp. 196-230). London: Continuum.
7. Coffin, C. (2002). The voices of history: Theorizing the interpersonal semantics of historical discourses. Text, 22(4), 503-528.
8. Coffin, C. (2003). Reconstruals of the Past - Settlement or invasion? The role of judgement analysis. En J. Martin & R. Wodak (Eds.), Re/ reading the past (pp. 219-246). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
9. Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.
10. Eggins, S. & Martin, J. (1997). Genres and registers of discourse. En T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (pp. 230-256). London: Sage.
11. Fontana, J. (1992). La historia después del fin de la historia. Reflexiones acerca de la situación actual de la ciencia histórica. Barcelona: Crítica.
12. Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
13. Hood, S. & Martin, J. (2005). Invocación de actitudes: El juego de la gradación de la valoración en el discurso. Revista Signos, 38(58), 195-220.
14. Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Kress, G. (1989). History and language: Towards a social account of language change, Journal of Pragmatics, 13, 445-66.
16. Martin, J. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. En F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the work place and school (pp. 3-39). London: Continuum.
17. Martin, J. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. En S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Martin, J. (2002). Writing history: Construing time and value in discourses of the past. En M. Schleppegrell & M. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 87-118). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Martin, J. (2003). Introduction, Text, 23(2), 171-181.
20. Martin, J. (2004). Sense and sensibility: Texturing evaluation. En J. Foley (Ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches (pp. 270-304). London: Continuum.
21. Martin, J. & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse. London: Continuum.
22. Martin, J. & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
23. Oteíza, T. (2003). How contemporary history is presented in Chilean middle school textbooks. Discourse & Society, 14(5), 639-660.
24. Oteíza, T. (2006). El discurso pedagógico de la historia. Un análisis lingüístico sobre la construcción ideológica de la historia de Chile (1970-2001). Santiago, Chile: Frasis Editores.
25. Oteíza, T. & Pinto, D. (2008). Agency, responsibility and silence in the construction of contemporary history in Chile and Spain. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 333-358.
26. Pardo, N. (2007). Cómo hacer análisis crítico del discurso. Una perspectiva latinoamericana. Santiago, Chile: Frasis Editores.
27. Pinto, D. (2004). Indoctrinating the youth of Post-war Spain: A discourse analysis of a fascist civics textbook. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 649-667.
28. Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M. & Oteíza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. Tesol Quarterly, 38, 67-93.
29. Stanford, M. (1994). A companion to the study of history. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Trouillot, M. (1995). Silencing the past. Power and the production of history. Boston: Beacon Press.
31. Van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology a multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
32. Van Dijk, T. (2005). Ideología y análisis del discurso, Utopía y praxis latinoamericana, 29, 9-36.
33. Van Dijk, T. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383.
34. Veel, R. & Coffin, C. (1996). Learning to think like a Historian: The language of secondary school history. En R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 191-231). London: Longman.
35. White, P. (2000). The appraisal website [en línea]. Disponible en: http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/
36. White, P. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259-284.
37. Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past (Critical perspectives on the past). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.