Hip Resurfacing Vs. Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty

Evidence-Based Orthopedics

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 137-152

  Diwanji, Sanket R ^a   Vendittoli, Pascal André ^a   Lavigne, Martin ^a  

^a MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acetabular bone; Avascular necrosis; Femoral neck fracture; Hip; Hip resurfacing; Metal ions; Osteoarthritis; Range of motion; Surface replacement arthroplasty; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878441392     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444345100.ch16     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Chung SMK. The arterial supply of the developing proximal end of the human femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58(7):961-70.
2. Notzli HP, Siebenrock KA, Hempfing A, et al. Perfusion of the femoral head during surgical dislocation of the hip. Monitoring by laser Doppler flowmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84(2):300-4.
3. Ogden JA. Changing patterns of proximal femoral vascularity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56(5):941-50.
4. Lavigne M, Kalhor M, Beck M, et al. Distribution of vascular foramina around the femoral head and neck junction: relevance for conservative intracapsular procedures of the hip. Orthop Clin N Am 2005;36:171-6.
5. Clarke, I.C. Symposium on Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Hip. Biomechanics: multifactorial design choices-an essential compromise? Orthop Clin North Am 1982;13:681-707.
6. Beaule, P.E., Harvey, N., Zaragoza, E et al. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:9-15.
7. Vendittoli P-A, Ganpathi M, Nuno N, et al. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. Clin Biomechanics 2007;22:1004-12.
8. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T et al. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84 (suppl 2):S2-20.
9. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada. Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) 2008-2009 Annual Report. CIHI, Ottawa, 2009.
10. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 2007;370:1508-19.
11. Fowble VA, de la Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty-patients and outcomes. Bull N Y U Hosp Jt Dis 2009;67(2):108-12.
12. Loughead JM, Starks I, Chesney D, et al. Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(1): 31-4.
13. Havelin LI, Fenstad AM, Salomonsson R, et al. The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. Acta Orthop 2009;80(4): 393-401.
14. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. AOA, Adelaide, 2010.
15. Thomas BJ, Amstutz HC. Revision surgery for failed surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;170:42-9.
16. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, et al. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;418:87-93.
17. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:463-4.
18. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Ruther W, et al. Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220: 333-44.
19. Springer BD, Connelly SE, Odum SM, et al. Cementless femoral component in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(6 Suppl 1).
20. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Roy AG et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old. Hip Int 2006;16 (Suppl 4):73-81.
21. Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Roy AG, Lusignan D, Lavigne M. A comparison of clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 28 mm metal on metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomised trial with 3-6 years follow-up. Hip Int 2010;20(1):1-13.
22. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;453:123-31.
23. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:66-71.
24. Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, et al. The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(2): 326-36.
25. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Girard J, et al. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(8):997-1002.
26. Brennan SA, Harty JA, Gormley C, et al. Comparison of acetabular reamings during hip resurfacing vs. uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2009;17(1):42-6.
27. Loughead JM, Starks I, Chesney D, et al. Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(1): 31-4.
28. Naal FD, Kain MS, Hersche O, et al. Does hip resurfacing require larger acetabular cups than conventional THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(4):923-8.
29. Moonot P, Singh PJ, Cronin MD, et al. Birmingham hip resurfacing: is acetabular bone conserved? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90(3): 319-23.
30. Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, et al. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(6):721-6.
31. Ahmad R, Gillespie G, Annamalai S, et al. Leg length and offset following hip resurfacing and hip replacement. Hip Int 2009;9(2):136-40.
32. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, et al. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86: 40-6.
33. Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, et al. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87(2):163-6.
34. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40.
35. Merle D'Aubigné R. Cotation chiffrée de la fonction de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop 1990;76:371-4.
36. Lavigne M, Masse V, Girard J, et al. Return to sport after hip resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 2008;94(4):361-7.
37. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:228-41.
38. Zywiel MG, Marker DR, McGrath MS, et al. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels-a comparison of postoperative outcomes. Bull N Y U Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):116-19.
39. Le Duff MJ, Wisk LE, Amstutz HC. Range of motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing-a clinical study. Bull N Y U Hosp Jt Dis 2009;67(2):177-81.
40. Stulberg BN, Fitts SM, Bowen AR, et al. Early return to function after hip resurfacing is it better than contemporary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2010;25(5):748-53.
41. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(5): 592-60.
42. Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(2):318-25.
43. Li J, Xu W, Xu L, Liang Z. Hip resurfacing for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthopedics 2008;31(12).
44. Lavigne M, Ganapathi M, Mottard S, Girard J, Vendittoli PA. Range of motion of large head total hip arthroplasty is greater than 28 mm total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011;26(3):267-73.
45. Lindemann U, Becker C, Unnewehr I, et al. Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional outcome in total hip replacement. Clin Rehabil 2006;20(5):413-20.
46. Shrader MW, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky MC, et al. Gait and stair function in total and resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(6):1476-84.
47. Marker DR, Strimbu K, McGrath MS, et al. Resurfacing vs. conventional total hip arthroplasty-review of comparative clinical and basic science studies. Bull N Y U Hosp Jt Dis 2009;67(2): 120-7.
48. Nantel J, Termoz N, Centomo H, et al. Postural balance during quiet standing in patients with total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty. Clin Biomechan 2008;23:402-7.
49. Rama KR, Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, et al. Heterotopic ossification after surface replacement arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(2): 256-62.
50. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55:1629-32.
51. Cornelis R, Heinzow B, Herber RFM, et al. Sample collection guidelines for trace elements in blood and urine. J Trace Elements Med Biol 1996;10:103-27.
52. Keegan GM, Learmonth ID, Case CP. A systematic comparison of the actual, potential, and theoretical health effects of cobalt and chromium exposures from industry and surgical implants. Crit Rev Toxicol 2008;38:645-74.
53. Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, et al. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective controlled longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80: 1447-58.
54. MacDonald SJ. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: the concerns. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;429:86-93.
55. Vendittoli P-A, Mottard S, Roy A, et al. Release from bearing wear and corrosion with 28 mm and large diameter metal-onmetal bearing articulations. J. Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92(1): 12-19.
56. Antoniou J, Zukor DJ, Mwale F, et al. Metal ion levels in the blood of patients after hip resurfacing: a comparison between twenty-eight and thirty-six-millimeter-head metal-on-metal prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(3):142-8.
57. Clarke MT, Lee PT, Arora A, et al. Levels of metal ions after small- and large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85(6):913-17.
58. Witzleb WC, Ziegler J, Krummenauer F, et al. Exposure to chromium, cobalt and molybdenum from metal-on-metal total hip replacement and hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2006;77(5):697-705.
59. Moroni A, Savarino L, Cadossi M, et al. Does ion release differ between hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466(3):700-7.
60. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Salama A, et al. The effect of the diameter of metal-on-metal bearings on systemic exposure to cobalt and chromium. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(4):443-8.
61. Vendittoli P-A, Amzica T, Roy A, et al. Metal ion release with large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011;26(2):282-8.
62. Beaule PE, Antoniades J. Patient selection and surgical technique for surface arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin N Am 2005;36 177-85.
63. Ball S T, Le Duff M J, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:735-41.
64. McGrath MS, Marker DR, Seyler TM, et al. Surface replacement is comparable to primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:94-100.