The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 9-15

  Beaule P E ^a   Harvey, N ^b   Zaragoza, E ^c   Le Duff, M J ^b   Dorey, F J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Santa Monica UCLA Medical Center   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE NECROSIS; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COXALGIA; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD PROSTHESIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOMETRY; PAIN; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTTRAUMATIC ARTHROPATHY; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; JOINT DEFORMITIES, ACQUIRED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PELVIC BONES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33846853331     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18011     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Beaulé PE. Surface arthroplasty of the hip: a review and current indications. Semin Arthroplasty 2005;16:70-6.
2. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
3. Treacy R, McBryde CW, Pynsent P. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-70.
4. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:177-84.
5. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham Hip Resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:324-9.
6. Beaulé PE, Antoniades J. Patient selection and surgical technique for surface arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:177-85.
7. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff MJ, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;418:87-93.
8. Beaulé PE, Lee J, LeDuff M, et al. Orientation of femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:2015-21.
9. Shimmin A, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:463-4.
10. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, dela Rosa M, Schmalzried TP. Biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg[Am]2004;86-A:40-1.
11. Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:163-6.
12. Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;388:125-34.
13. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An K-N, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995;77-B:865-9.
14. Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, Roy A. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;86-B:721-6.
15. Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig S, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: a metal-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:171-6.
16. Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed MN, Ganz R. Cross-table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int 2001;11:37-41.
17. Beaulé PE, Zaragoza EJ, Motamedic J, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoro-acetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 2005;23:1286-92.
18. Myers SR, Eijer H, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop 1999;363:93-9.
19. Reynolds O, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum: a cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:281-8.
20. Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R. Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion: treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:278-86.
21. Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, et al. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002:84-B:556-60.
22. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Leunig M, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop 2003;417:112-20.
23. Murray RO. The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. Br J Radiol 1965;38:810-24.
24. Stulberg SO, Cordell LD, Harris WH, Ramsey PL, MacEwen GD. Unrecognized childhood hip disease: a major cause of idiopathic osteoarthritis of the hip. In: Amstutz HC ed. The Hip. Procs Third Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1975:212-28.
25. Harris WH. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop 1986;213:20-33.
26. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979.
27. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, et al. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip: a new technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:1119-24.
28. Beaulé PE. A soft tissue-sparing approach to surface arthroplasty of the hip. Oper Tech Ortho 2004;14:75-84.
29. Lavigne M, Kalhor M, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M. Distribution of vascular foramina around the femoral head and neck junction: relevance for conservative intracapsular procedures of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:171-6.
30. Tonnis O, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1999;81-A:1747-70.
31. Clarke IC. Biomechanics: multifactorial design choices: an essential compromise? Orthop Clin North Am 1982;13:681-707.
32. Freeman MAR, Bradley GW. ICLH double cup arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1982;13:799-811.
33. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CWJ. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:315-21.
34. Amstutz HC, Markolf KL. Design features in total hip replacement. In: Harris WH, ed. The Hip Society. St. Louis, etc 1974:111-24.
35. Chandler DR, Glousman R, Hull D, et al. Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement: the effects of head and neck geometry. Clin Orthop 1982;166:284-91.
36. Amstutz HC, Lodwig RM, Schurman DJ, Hodgson AG. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements: a comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop 1975;111:124-30.
37. Scifert CF, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ. A finite element analysis of factors influencing total hip dislocation. Clin Orthop 1998;355:152-62.
38. Howie DW, McCalden R, Nawana RW, et al. The long-term wear of retrieved McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal total hip prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:350-7.
39. Barrack RL, Schmalzried TP. Impingement and rim wear associated with early osteolysis after a total hip replacement: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:1218-20.
40. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Ebramzadeh E, et al. Lessons learned from loosening of the McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:326-32.
41. Klapperich C, Graham J, Pruitt L, Ries MD. Failure of a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty from progressive osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:877-81.
42. Howie D, Cornish B, Vernon-Roberts B. Resurfacing hip arthroplasty: classification of loosening and the role of prosthetic wear particles. Clin Orthop 1990;255:144-59.
43. Ring PA. Total replacement of the hip joint: a review of a thousand operations. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1974;56-B:44-58.
44. Beaulé PE, LeDuff M, Campbell P, et al. Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7-10 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(Supp 13):17-22.
45. Wiadrowski TP, McGee M, Cornish BL, Howie DW. Peripheral wear of Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 1991;6:103-7.
46. Harty M. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip: anatomic considerations. Orthop Clin North Am 1982;13:667-79.
47. Schmalzried T, Silva M, de la Rosa MA, Choi E-S, Fowble VA. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop 2005;441:200-4.
48. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P, Dorey FJ. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci 1998;3:169-86.
49. Bartz RL, Noble PC, Kadakia NR, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:1300-7.
50. Mardones RM, Gonzalez C, Chen Q, et al. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:273-9.