Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: Review of comparative clinical and basic science studies

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 120-127

  Marker, David R ^a   Strimbu, Kyle ^a   McGrath, Mike S ^a   Zywiel, Michael G ^a   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; BIOMECHANICS; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CLINICAL STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE; GAIT; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS ARTHRITIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG LENGTH; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; METALS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649496583     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370:1508-1519 (Pubitemid 47625538)
2. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:592-600.
3. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:167-170
4. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1431-1438
5. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228-241 (Pubitemid 14150389)
6. Gore DR, Murray MP, Gardner GM, Sepic SB. Hip function after total vs. surface replacement. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56:386-390 (Pubitemid 16169825)
7. Meldrum RD, Maiers GP 2nd, Feinberg JR, et al. Long-term outcome of surface replacement with comparison to an age-and time-matched primary total hip arthroplasty cohort. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:1-9. (Pubitemid 350299739)
8. Liu F, Udofia IJ, Jin ZM, et al. Comparison of contact mechanics between a total hip replacement and a hip resurfacing with a metal-on-metal articulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C. J Mech Eng Sci. 2009:727-732
9. Doherty SR, Thompson MT, Usrey MM, et al. Does hip resurfacing restore normal range of motion and provide better joint motion than THR? Presented at: The 53rd Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society; February 11-14, 2007; San Diego, California, paper #0276.
10. Bengs BC, Sangiorgio SN, Ebramzadeh E. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:755-762
11. Deuel CR, Jamali AA, Stover SM, Hazelwood SJ. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:124-130
12. Su EP, Sheehan M, Su SL. Comparison of Bone Removed During Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Resurfacing or Conventional Femoral Component A Cadaveric Study. J Arthroplasty. 2008; Epub Dec 2 ahead of print.
13. Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:163-166 (Pubitemid 40278013)
14. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, et al. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:40-46 (Pubitemid 38057334)
15. Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, Roy AG. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:721-726 (Pubitemid 43971134)
16. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Girard J, Roy AG. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:997-1002. (Pubitemid 44241192)
17. Rama KR, Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, et al. Heterotopic ossification after surface replacement arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:256-62.
18. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;(453):123-131 (Pubitemid 44900970)
19. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;(467):66-71.
20. Lavigne M, Masse V, Girard J, et al. [Return to sport after hip resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94:361-367 [French]
21. Stulberg BN, Fitts SM, Bowen A. Early return to function after hip resurfacing. Is it better than contemporary THA? Proceedings of the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting; March 5-9, 2008; San Francisco, California, p. 383.
22. Haddad FS, Bull J. Hip resurfacing has superior sustained functional outcomes when compared to total hip arthroplasty. Proceedings of the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting; March 5-9, 2008; San Francisco, California, p. 428.
23. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, et al. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:100-108 (Pubitemid 46014052)
24. Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, Nantel J, Prince F. Gait analysis in three types of hip replacement. Proceedings of the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting; March 5-9, 2008; San Francisco, California, p. 431.
25. Shimmin AJ, Bennell K, Wriglet T, et al. Gait analysis comparison of the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. Proceedings of the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting; March 5-9, 2008; San Francisco, California, p. 382.
26. Nantel J, Termoz N, Centomo H, et al. Postural balance during quiet standing in patients with total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23:402-407
27. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:735-741 (Pubitemid 46564276)
28. McGrath MS, Marker DR, Seyler TM, et al. Surface replacement is comparable to primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;(467):94-100.
29. Loughead JM, Starks I, Chesney D, et al. Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:31-34
30. Girard J, Vendittoli PA, Roy AG, Lavigne M. [Femoral offset restoration and clinical function after total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement of the hip: a randomized study]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94:376-381 [French]
31. Lavigne M, Vendittoli P, Roy A, Lusignan D. A randomized study comparing surface replacement arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty. Proceedings of the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting; March 5-9, 2008; San Francisco, California, p. 384.
32. Lavigne M, Mottard S, Girard J, Vendittoli PA. Range of motion after hip resurfacing and THA: a single-blind randomized clinical study. Proceedings of the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting; March 5-9, 2008; San Francisco, California, p. 384-385