Leg length and offset following hip resurfacing and hip replacement

HIP International

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 136-140

  Ahmad, Riaz ^a,b   Gillespie, Gordon ^a   Annamalai, Suresh ^a   Barakat, Mohannad J ^a   Ahmed, Shahbaz M Y ^a   Smith, Lindsay K ^a   Spencer, Robert F ^a  

^a WESTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Femoral offset; Hip replacement; Hip resurfacing; Leg length

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RESURFING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; HYBRID HIP REPLACEMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG LENGTH; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOTOMY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOTOMY;

EID: 67849092372     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070000901900210     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Grigoris P, Roberts P, Panousis K, Bosch H. The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 125-34.
2. Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 163-6.
3. Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, Roy AG. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 721-6.
4. Konyves A, Bannister GC. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 155-7.
5. White TO, Dougall TW. Arthroplasty of the hip. Leg length is not important. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 335-8.
6. Williamson JA, Reckling FW. Limb length discrepancy and related problems following total hip joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978; 134: 135-8.
7. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 865-9.
8. Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Course Lect 2005; 54: 131-41.
9. Devane PA, Horne JG. Assessment of polyethylene wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 369: 59-72.
10. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, Dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 40-6.
11. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 418: 87-93.
12. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 1874-7.