The Use of Tapered Stems for Femoral Revision Surgery

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 420, Issue , 2004, Pages 148-159

  Böhm, Paul ^a   Bischel, Oliver ^b  

^a EuromedClinic   (Germany)

^b Kreiskrankenhaus Balingen   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 1842424340     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (65)

1. Amstutz HC, Ma SM, Jinnah RH, et al. Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. 1982;170:21-33.
2. Barnett E, Nordin BEC. The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: A new approach. Clin Radiol. 1960;11:166-174.
3. Barrack RL, Folgueras AJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty: The femoral component. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:79-85.
4. Berry DJ. Femoral revision: Distal fixation with fluted, tapered gritblasted stems. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:142-146.
5. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup D, et al. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop. 1995;319: 168-177.
6. Blackley HR, Davis AM, Hutchison CR, et al. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip: A nine to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83A:346-354.
7. Böhm P, Banzhaf S. Acetabular revision with allograft bone: 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:240-249.
8. Böhm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: Evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83A:1023-1031.
9. Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Lee J, et al. Fixation with a modular stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:131-139.
10. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg. 1973;55A:1629-1632.
11. Buchholz J, Neumann K, Knopp W, et al. [Hip para-articular femoral fracture in total endoprosthesis] Die hüftgelenknahe Femurfraktur bei einliegender Totalendoprothese. Chirurg. 1995;66:1120-1125.
12. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, et al. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982: A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67A:1074-1085.
13. Chen WM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, et al. Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000; 82A:1215-1219.
14. Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE, et al. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988;236:214-220.
15. Elting JJ, Mikhail WE, Zicat BA, et al. Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1995;319:159-167.
16. Engelbrecht DJ, Weber FA, Sweet MB, et al. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1990;72B:41-45.
17. Engh CA, Massin P. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic medullary locking stem: Results using a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop. 1989;249:141-158.
18. Estok DM, Harris WH. Long-term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation techniques: An average 11.7-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop. 1994;299:190-202.
19. Franzén H, Mjöberg B. Önnerfält R: Early loosening of femoral components after cemented revision: A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. [published erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg 75B: 169, 1993] J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74B:721-724.
20. Franzén H, Mjöberg B. Önnerfält R: Early loosening of femoral components after cemented revision: A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. [published erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg 75B: 169, 1993] J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74B:721-724.
21. Franzén H, Toksvig Larsen S, Lidgren L. Önnerfält R: Early migration of femoral components revised with impacted cancellous allografts and cement: A preliminary report of five patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77B: 862-864.
22. Gerber P, Wicki O. Allgemeinzustand von Tumorpatienten. In: Gerber P, Wicki O (eds). Stadien und Einteilungen in der Medizin. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1990:353.
23. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, et al. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75B: 14-21.
24. Gorab RS, Covino BM, Borden LS. The rationale for cementless revision total hip replacement with contemporary technology. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:627-633.
25. Gross AE, Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, et al. Revision arthroplasty of the proximal femur using allograft bone. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:705-715.
26. Grünig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE. Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116:187-197.
27. Hungerford DS, Jones LC. The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin Orthop. 1988;235:12-24.
28. Hussamy O, Lachiewicz PF. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the BIAS (Biologic Ingrowth Anatomic System) femoral component: Three to six-year results. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76A:1137-1148.
29. Jones LC, Hungerford DS. Cement disease. Clin Orthop. 1987;225:192-206.
30. Kavanagh BF, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Multiple revisions for failed total hip arthroplasty not associated with infection. J Bone Joint Surg. 1987;69A: 1144-1149.
31. Kershaw CJ, Atkins RM, Dodd CA, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptic failure: A review of 276 cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73B: 564-568.
32. Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, et al. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis: 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:541-544.
33. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:839-847.
34. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, et al. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76A:965-973.
35. Leopold SS, Rosenberg AG. Current status of impaction allografting for revision of a femoral component. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:111-118.
36. Malkani AL, Settecerri JJ, Sim FH, et al. Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77B:351-356.
37. Mallory TH. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision. Clin Orthop. 1988;235:47-60.
38. Mears DC, Rubash HE, Matta JM. Approaches to the Pelvic Ring and Acetabulum. In: Mears DC, Rubash HE (eds). Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc; 1986:215-249.
39. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, et al. Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty: A minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79A: 1834-1841.
40. Merle D'Aubigné R. Cotation chiffrée de la fonction de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1970;56:481-486.
41. Mont MA, Maar DC. Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after hip arthroplasty: A statistical analysis of outcome based on 487 patients. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:511-519.
42. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop. 1995;319:141-150.
43. Morscher E. [Experiences, requirements and development of cement-free hip endoprostheses] Erfahrungen. Anforderungen und Entwicklung von zementfreien Hüftendoprothesen. Orthopäde. 1987;16:185-196.
44. Nelissen RG, Bauer TW, Weidenhielm LR, et al. Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting: Histological analysis of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77A:412-422.
45. Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, et al. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993;295:172-178.
46. Peters CL, Rivero DP, Kull LR, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty without cement: Subsidence of proximally porous-coated femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77A:1217-1226.
47. Raut VV, Siney PD, Wroblewski BM. Revision for aseptic stem loosening using the cemented Charnley prosthesis: A review of 351 hips. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77B:23-27.
48. Retpen JB, Varmarken JE, Rock ND, et al. Unsatisfactory results after repeated revision of hip arthroplasty: 61 cases followed for 5 (1-10) years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63:120-127.
49. Roberson JR. Proximal femoral bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:291-302.
50. Rosenberg AG. Fixation for the millennium: The hip. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:3-5.
51. Rothman RH, Cohn JC. Cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty: A critical review. Clin Orthop. 1990;254:153-169.
52. Sim FH, Chao EY. Hip salvage by proximal femoral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1981;63A:1228-1239.
53. Stoffelen DV, Broos PL. The use of the Wagner revision prosthesis in complex (post) traumatic conditions of the hip. Acta Orthop Belg. 1995; 61:135-139.
54. Strömberg CN, Herberts P. A multicenter 10-year study of cemented revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old: A follow-up report. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:595-601.
55. Voigt C, Zimmer Amrheim S, Enes Gaiao F, et al. [Using of a Wagner stem in revision-arthroplasty following loosening of a total hip endoprosthesis] Wechseloperation der gelockerten Hüftgelenksendoprothese mit dem Wagner-Revisionsschaft. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1994; 61:77-80.
56. Wagner H. Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk bei schwerem Knochenverlust. Orthopäde. 1987;16:295-300.
57. Wagner H. [A revision prosthesis for the hip joint] Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk. Orthopäde. 1989;18:438-453.
58. Wagner H. Revision of Femoral Stem With Important Loss of Bone Stock. In: European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (ed). Post Graduate Lectures Number I. Paris: Masson; 1993:64-74.
59. Wagner H, Wagner M. Konische Schaftverankerung Zementfreier Hüftprothesen-Primärimplantation und Prothesenwechsel. In Morscher EW (ed). Endoprothetik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1995:278-288.
60. Wagner H, Wagner M. Hüftprothesenwechsel mit der Femur-Revisionsprothese-Erfahrungen aus 10 Jahren. Med Orth Tech. 1997;117: 138-148.
61. Weber M, Hempfing A, Orler R, et al. Femoral revision using the Wagner stem: Results at 2-9 years. Int Orthop. 2002;26:36-39.
62. Wehrli U. [Wagner revision of prosthesis stem] Wagner-Revisionsprothesenschaft. Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed. 1991;84:216-224.
63. Wirtz DC, Niethard FU. [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening-a status assessment] Ursachen, Diagnostik und Therapie der aseptischen Hüftendoprothesenlockerung-eine Standortbestimmung. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997;135:270-280.
64. Younger TI, Bradford MS, Magnus RE, et al. Extended proximal femoral osteotomy: A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:329-338.
65. Zmolek JC, Dorr LD. Revision total hip arthroplasty: The use of solid allograft. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:361-370.