Five- to 10-Year Results Using a Noncemented Modular Revision Stem Without Bone Grafting

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 964-970

  Köster, Georg ^a   Walde, Tim A ^b   Willert, Hans Georg ^b  

^a Clinic for Orthopaedic Surgery   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

modular stem design; noncemented fixation; revision hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; BONE REMODELING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR SHAFT; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORTALITY; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SEPSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 52249087579     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.024     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Engh Jr. C.A., Ellis T.J., Koralewicz L.M., et al. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 955
2. Paprosky W.G., Greidanus N.V., and Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (1999) 230
3. Böhm P., and Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 (2001) 1023
4. Cameron H.U. The 3-6-year results of a modular noncemented low-bending stiffness hip implant. A preliminary study. J Arthroplasty 8 (1993) 239
5. Köhler H.P., Andonov C., Köster G., et al. Die Revision der gelockerten Schaftkomponente mit der modularen Profemur-Revisionskomponente. Orthop Mitt 25 (1995) 181
6. Kwong L.M., Miller A.J., and Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 18 3 Suppl 1 (2003) 94
7. Wirtz D.C., Heller K.D., Holzwarth U., et al. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 24 (2000) 134
8. Cameron H.U. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 4 Suppl 1 (2002) 138
9. Barrack R.L. Orthopaedic crossfire - Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 18 3 Suppl 1 (2003) 98
10. Cameron H.U. The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop (1994) 47
11. Christie M.J., DeBoer D.K., Tingstad E.M., et al. Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty; 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty 15 (2000) 840
12. Engelbrecht E., and Heinert K. Klassifikation und Behand-lungsrichtlinien von Knochensubstanzverlusten bei Revisionsoperationen am Hüftgelenk - mittelfristige Ergebnisse. In: Endo-Klinik (Ed). Primäre und Revisionsalloarthroplastik (1987), Springer Verlag, Hamburg
13. Wagner H., and Wagner M. Femur revision prosthesis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 131 (1993) 574
14. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., and Amstutz H.C. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop (1979) 17
15. Callaghan J.J., Salvati E.A., Pellicci P.M., et al. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 (1985) 1074
16. Brooker A.F., Bowerman J.W., Robinson R.A., et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55 (1973) 1629
17. Kaplan E.L., and Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc (1958) 457
18. Grunig R., Morscher E., and Ochsner P.E. Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116 (1997) 187
19. Bugbee W.D., Culpepper II W.J., Engh Jr. C.A., et al. Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997) 1007
20. Wagner H. Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss. Orthopäde 16 (1987) 295