Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 369, Issue , 1999, Pages 230-242

  Paprosky, Wayne G ^a,b,d   Greidanus, Nelson V ^c   Antoniou, John ^c  

^a RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b CENTRAL DUPAGE HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Rush/Ctrl Dupage Adult Reconstr F   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032786654     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00024     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Aribindi R, Barba M, Solomon MI, Arp P, Paprosky W: Bypass fixation. Orthop Clin North Am 29:319-329, 1998.
2. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup D, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME: Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop 319:168-177, 1995.
3. Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, Anderson LC, Varma AK: Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop 319:130-140, 1995.
4. D'Aubigne RM, Postel M: Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 36A:451-453, 1954.
5. Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB: Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 236:214-220, 1988.
6. Dorr LD: Total hip replacement using APR system. Tech Orthop 1(Suppl 2):23-24, 1986.
7. Duncan CP, Masterson EL, Masri BA: Impaction allografting with cement for the management of femoral bone loss. Orthop Clin North Am 29:297-305, 1998.
8. Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ, Whitehouse SL, Learmonth ID: Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 12:535-540, 1997.
9. Elting JJ, Mikhail WE, Zicat BA, et al: Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 319:159-167, 1995.
10. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH: Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone in-growth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg 69B:45-55, 1987.
11. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE: Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components [published erratum appears in Clin Orthop 284:310-312,1992] [see comments]. Clin Orthop 257:107-128, 1990.
12. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17-27, 1979.
13. Head WC, Wagner RA, Emerson Jr RH, Malinin TI: Revision total hip arthroplasty in the deficient femur with a proximal load-bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop 141:119-126, 1994.
14. Hellman EJ, Capello WN, Feinberg JR: Nonunion of extended trochanteric osteotomies in impaction grafting femoral revisions. J Arthroplasty 13:945-949, 1998.
15. Katz RP, Callaghan JJ, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC: Results of cemented femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using improved cementing techniques. Clin Orthop 319:178-183, 1995.
16. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald Jr RH: Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:517-526, 1985.
17. Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlstedt B: The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 67:541-544, 1996.
18. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG: 5-to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 12:839-847, 1997.
19. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE: Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results without cement. Orthop Clin North Am 24:635-644, 1993.
20. Malkani AL, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME, Wallrichs SL: Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 11:411-418, 1996.
21. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM: Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 79A:1834-1841, 1997.
22. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML: Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop 319:141-150, 1995.
23. Mulliken BD, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB: Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review. Clin Orthop 325:156-162, 1996.
24. Mulroy WF, Harris WH: Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 78A:325-330, 1996.
25. Pellicci PM, Wilson Jr. PD, Sledge CB, et al: Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:513-516, 1985.
26. Suominen S, Santavirta S: Revision total hip arthroplasty in deficient proximal femur using a distal load-bearing prosthesis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 85:253-262, 1996.
27. Whiteside LA: The effect of stem fit on bone hypertrophy and pain relief in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 247:138-147, 1989.
28. Woolson ST, Delaney TJ: Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(Suppl):S22-S28, 1995.