From teaching to KNOW to learning to THINK in science education

Second International Handbook of Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 209-229

  Zoller, Uri ^a   Nahum, Tami Levy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878038624     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_16     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Project 2061. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy: Ready for use! New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Barak, M., Ben-Chaim, D., & Zoller, U. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353-369.
3. Ben-Chaim, D., Barak, M., Overton, T., & Zoller, U. (submitted). Problem solving in higher education chemistry: Students' performance and views. Journal of Chemical Education.
4. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 518-560.
5. Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York:Longmans Green.
6. Boddy, N., Watson, K., & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five Es: A referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33, 27-42.
7. Cohn, A. (2005). Conceptualization and transfer in science education, using a STES oriented project approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (in Hebrew), University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
8. Cracolice, M. S., Deming, J. C. Ehlert, B. (2008). Concept learning versus problem solving: A cognitive difference. Journal of Chemical Education, 85 (6), 873-878.
9. de Bono, E. (1976). Teaching thinking. London: Penguin.
10. Dori, Y. J., & Hershcovitz, O. (1999). Question posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 411-430.
11. Ennis, R. H. (2002). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum and its assessment. In Arthur L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds (3rd ed., pp. 44-46). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
12. Facione, P., & Facione, N. (2007). Thinking and reasoning in human decision making: The method of argument and heuristic analysis. Milbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
13. Hayes, J. R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.
14. Johnstone, A. H. (1993). Introduction. In C. Wood & R. Sleet (Eds.), Creative problem solving in chemistry (pp. 4-6). London: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
15. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28 (1), 16-26.
16. Lazarowitz R., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1998). Cooperative learning in the science curriculum. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 444-469). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
17. Leou, M., Abder, P., Riordan, M., & Zoller, U. (2006) Using 'HOCS-centered learning' as a pathway to promote science teachers' metacognitive development. Research in Science Education, 36, 69-84.
18. Levy Nahum, T., Ben-Chaim, D., Azaiza, I., Herscovitz, O., Zoller, U. (2010). Does STES-oriented science education promote 10th -grade students' decision making capability? International Journal of Science Education, 32 (10), 1315-1336.
19. Levy Nahum, T., Azaiza, I., Kortam, N., Ben-Chaim, D., & Zoller, U. (2009, April). Evaluative thinking capability within two cultures: A case of secondary science education. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Garden Grove, CA. (Also available in the proceeding of that meeting).
20. Levy Nahum, T., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Developing a new teaching approach for the chemical bonding concept aligned with current scientific and pedagogical knowledge. Science Education, 91, 579-603.
21. Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 781-796.
22. Nakhleh, M.B. (1993). Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 52-55.
23. Overton, T. L. (2001). Teaching chemists to think: From parrots to professionals. University Chemistry Teaching, 5, 62-68.
24. Overton, T. L., & Potter, N. (2008). Solving open-ended problem, and the influence of cognitive factors on student success. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 65-69.
25. Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 167-182.
26. Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy.
27. Solomon, G., & Perkins, D. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer. Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113-142.
28. Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (Eds.). (1994). Science, technology and society education:International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
29. Tal, R. T., Dori, Y. J., Keiny, S., & Zoller, U. (2001). Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum development; The STEMS project approach. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 247-262
30. Tomorrow 98. (1992). Report of the superior committee on science, mathematics and technology education in Israel - Harari report. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.
31. Weinberger, Y., & Zohar, A. (2000). Higher order thinking in science teacher education in Israel. In S. K. Abell (Ed.), Science teacher education: An international perspective (pp. 95-119). London: Kluwer.
32. Yager, R. E. (1993). (Ed.). Science-technology-society movement. Washington, DC: NSTA.
33. Zoller, U. (1990). Learning difficulties and students' misconceptions in freshman chemistry (general and organic). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 1053-1065.
34. Zoller, U. (1991). Problem-solving and the 'problem-solving paradox'. In S. Keiny & U. Zoller (Eds.), Conceptual issues in environmental education (pp. 71-87). New York:Peter Lang.
35. Zoller, U. (1993). Lecture and learning: Are they compatible? Maybe for LOCS; unlikely for HOCS. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 195-197.
36. Zoller, U. (1994). The examination where the student asks the questions. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 347-349.
37. Zoller, U. (1996). The development of students' HOCS - The key to progress in STES education. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 16, 268-272.
38. Zoller, U. (1998). Eshnav Le-MATAS (A window to science, technology and environment in modern society): A curriculum guide for MATAS. Oranim, Israel: Haifa University, Oranim. (in Hebrew)
39. Zoller, U. (1999). Scaling-up of higher-order cognitive skills-oriented college chemistry teaching:An action-oriented research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 583-596.
40. Zoller, U. (2000) Teaching tomorrow's college science courses - Are we getting it right? Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 409-414.
41. Zoller, U. (2004). Supporting 'HOCS learning' via students' self-assessment of homework assignments and examinations. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 116-118.
42. Zoller, U., Ben-Chaim, D., Ron, S., Pentimally, R. & Borsese, A. (2000). The disposition towards critical thinking of high school and university science students, an inter-intra-Israeli-Italian study. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 571-582.
43. Zoller, U., Dori, Y. & Lubezky, A. (2002). Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (chemistry) exam questions: Performance and attitudes of college students. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 185-203.
44. Zoller, U., Fastow, M., Lubezky, A., & Tsaparlis, G. (1999). College students' self-assessment in chemistry examinations requiring higher- and lower-order cognitive skills (HOCS and LOCS); An action-oriented research. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 112-113.
45. Zoller, U., & Pushkin, D. (2007). Matching higher order cognitive skills (HOCS)-Promoting goal with problem-based laboratory practice in a freshman organic chemistry course. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 8, 153-171.
46. Zoller, U., & Scholz, R.W. (2004). The HOCS paradigm shift from disciplinary knowledge (LOCS) to interdisciplinary evaluative system thinking (HOCS): What should it take in sciencetechnology- environment-society-oriented courses, curricula and assessment? Water Science & Technology, 49 (8), 27-36.
47. Zoller, U., & Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Higher-order cognitive skills and lower-order cognitive skills:The case of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27, 117-130.