Designing the knowledge integration environment

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 781-796

  Linn, Marcia C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038134592     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095006900412275     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy: project 2061 (New York: Oxford University Press).
2. BELL, P. (1998) Conceptual change in the science classroom: designing technology-enhanced instruction using evidence and argument (Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley).
3. BELL, P. and LINN, M. C. (2000) Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning on the web. International Journal of Science Education
4. BLOOM, B. S. (1976) Human characteristics and school learning (New York: McGraw Hill).
5. BRANSFORD, J. D., SHERWOOD, R. D., HASSELBRING, T. S., KINZER, C. K. and WILLIAMS, M. (1990) Anchored instruction: why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix and R. Spiro, Cognition, Education and Multimedia (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 115-142.
6. BROWN, A. (1992) Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
7. BROWN, A. L. and CAMPIONE, J. C. (1994) Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (ed.), Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books), 229-270.
8. CLARK, H. C. (1996) Design of performance based assessments as contributors to student knowledge integration (Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley).
9. CLARK, D. and SLOTTA, J. D. (2000) Interpreting evidence on the internet: sex, lies, and multimedia. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 859-871.
10. COLLINS, A., BROWN, J. S. and HOLUM, A. (1991) Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11, 38-39.
11. DAVIS, E. and LINN, M. C. (2000) Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration through prompts for reflection. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.
12. DEWEY, J. (1901) Psychology and social practice. Contributions to education (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
13. DISESSA, A. (1988) Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman and P. Pufall, Constructivism in the Computer Age (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 49-70.
14. DUNBAR, K. (1995) How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In J. Davidson and R. J. Sternberg (eds) Mechanisms of Insight (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 365-395.
15. DUNBAR, K. (1996) How scientists think: online creativity and conceptual change in science. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward and S. Valid (eds) Conceptual Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery and Change (Washington DC: APA Press).
16. EYLON, B. S. and LINN, M. C. (1988) Learning and instruction: an examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58(3); 251-301.
17. GOLDSTEIN, J. S. (1992) A Different Sort of Time: The Life of Jerrold R. Zacharias, Scientist, Engineer, Educator (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
18. GORDIN, D. N., POLMAN, J. L. and PEA, R. D. T. (1994) The Climate Visualizer: Sensemaking through scientific visualization. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(4), 203-226.
19. HAWKINS, J. (1991) Technology-mediated communities for learning: designs and consequences. In V. M. Horner and L. G. Roberts, Electronic links for learning: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (Newbury Park: Sage), 514, 159-174.
20. HAWKINS, J. and PEA, R. D. (1987) Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 24, 291-307.
21. HOADLEY, C. M., HSI, S. et al. (1995) The Multimedia Forum Kiosk and the Speakeasy Discussion Tools. ACM Multimedia 1995, 4-8 Nov., Association for Computing Machinery, San Francisco, CA.
22. HOADLEY, C. and LINN, M. C. (2000) Learning through online peer discussions in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 839-857.
23. HSI, H. R. S. (1997) Facilitating knowledge integration in science through electronic discussion. The Multimedia Forum Kiosk. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
24. LATOUR, B. and WOOLGAR, S. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press).
25. LAVE, J. and WENGER, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).
26. LEWIS, E. L. (1991) The process of scientific knowledge acquisition among middle school students learning thermodynamics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
27. LEWIS, E. L. and LINN, M. C. (1994) Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31(6), 657-677.
28. LINN, M. C. (1995) Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: the scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126.
29. LINN, M., BELL, P. and HSI, S. (1998) Using the internet to enhance student understanding of science: the Knowledge Integration Environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(1/2), 4-38.
30. LINN, M. C. and BURBULES, N. C. (1993) Construction of knowledge and group learning. In K. Tobin, The practice of constructivism in science education Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 91-119.
31. LINN, M. C. and CLANCY, M. J. (1992) The case for case studies of programming problems. Communications of the ACM, 35(3), 121-132.
32. LINN, M. C. and CLARK, H. C. (1997) When are science projects learning opportunities? Research Matters, http://science.coe.uwf.edu/narst/research/projects.htm
33. LINN, M. C., DISESSA, A., PEA, R. D. and SONGER, N. B. (1994) Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(1), 7-15.
34. LINN, M. C. and HSI, S. (2000) Computers, Teachers, and Peers: Science Learning Partners (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
35. LINN, M. C. and MUILENBURG, L. (1996) Creating lifelong science learners: what models form a firm foundation? Educational Researcher 25(5), 18-24.
36. LINN, M. C., SHEAR, L., BELL, P. and SLOTTA, J. D. (1999) Organizing principles for science education partnerships: case studies of students’ learning about ‘rats in space’ and ‘deformed frogs’. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(2), 61-85.
37. MAYBERRY, M. (1998) Reproductive and resistant pedagogies: the comparative roles of collaborative learning and feminist pedagogy in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 443-459.
38. MEANS, B. and COLEMAN, E. (in press) Technology supports for student participation in science investigations. In M. J. Jacobson and R. B. Kozma, Learning the Sciences of the 21st Century: Theory, Research, and the Design of Advanced Technology Learning Environments (Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum).
39. MEANS, B., MIDDLETON, T. et al. (1996) GLOBE Year 1 Evaluation (Menlo Park, CA: SRI International).
40. MOKROS, J. R. and TINKER, R. F. (1987) The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children’s ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 369-383.
41. NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE EDUCATION STANDARDS AND ASSESSMENT (1996) National Science Education Standards: 1996 (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
42. NOVAK, J. D. (1968) A case study of curriculum changeÐ science since PSSC. School Science and Mathematics, 374-384.
43. PEA, R. and GOMEZ, L. (1992) Distributed multimedia learning environments: why and how? Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 73-109.
44. PEA, R. D. and GOMEZ, L. (1993) Distributed multimedia learning environments: the collaborative visualization project. Communications of the ACM, 36(5), 60-63.
45. SADKER, M. and SADKER, D. (1994) Failing at Fairness: How America’s Schools Cheat Girls (New York: Maxwell Macmillan International).
46. SCARDAMALIA, M. and BEREITER, C. (1991) Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: a challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37-68.
47. SCHMIDT, W. H., MCKNIGHT, C. C. and RAIZEN, S. A. (1996). A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education. U.S. National Research Center for the Third International Mathematics Science Study, Michigan State University.
48. SLOTTA, J. D. and LINN, M. C. (in press). The knowledge integration environment: helping students use the internet effectively. In M. J. Jacobson and R. Kozma (eds), Learning the Sciences of the 21st Century (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
49. STERN, J. S. and KIRKPATRICK, D. H. (1991) Computer as lab partner project. Chemunications Newsletter, VII(2), 1, 14-15.
50. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (1997) Pursuing Excellence: A Study of U.S. Eighth- Grade Mathematics and Science Teaching, Learning, Curriculum, and Achievement in International Context [NCES 97-198] (Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational Statistics, US Government Printing Office).
51. WELCH, W. W. (1979) Twenty years of science curriculum development: a look back. In D. C. Berliner, Review of research in education (Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association), 282-308.
52. WHITEHEAD, A. N. (1929) The Aims of Education (New York: Macmillan).