In the short term we divide, in the long term we unite: Demographic crisscrossing and the effects of faultlines on subgroup polarization

Organization Science

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 716-736

  Mäs, Michael ^a   Flache, Andreas ^b   Takács, Károly ^c   Jehn, Karen A ^d  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Computer simulations; Diversity in organizations; Group processes and performance; Mathematical models; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877941049     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0767     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abelson RP (1964) Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy. Frederiksen N, Gulliksen H, eds. Contributions to Mathematical Psychology (Holt, Rinehart Winston, New York), 142-160.
2. Abrams D, Wetherell M, Cochrane S, Hogg MA, Turner JC (1990) Knowing what to think by knowing who you are- Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British J. Soc. Psych. 29(2):97-119.
3. Adner R, Polos L, Ryall M, Sorenson O (2009) Introduction to special topic forum. The case for formal theory. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):201-208.
4. Bacharach SB, Bamberger PA, Vashdi D (2005) Diversity and homophily at work: Supportive relations among white and African-American peers. Acad. Management J. 48(4):619-644.
5. Bezrukova K, Jehn KA, Zanutto EL, Thatcher SMB (2009) Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organ. Sci. 20(1):35-50.
6. Bowers CA, Pharmer JA, Salas E (2000) When member homogeneity is needed in work teams. A meta-analysis. Small Group Res. 31(3):305-327.
7. Brown GDA, Chater N (2001) The chronological organization of memory: Common psychological foundations for remembering and timing. Hoerl C, McCormack T, eds. Time and Memory: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 77-110.
8. Byrne D (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).
9. Colson E (1954) Social control and vengeance in plateau Tonga society. Africa: J. Internat. African Inst. 23(3):199-212.
10. Cowan N (2001) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 24(1):87-185.
11. Evans-Pritchard EE (1939) Introduction. Peristiany JG, ed. The Social Institutions of the Kipsigis (Routledge, London), XIX-XXXIV.
12. Flache A, Mäs M (2008a) How to get the timing right? A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 14(1):23-51.
13. Flache A, Mäs M (2008b) Why do faultlines matter? A computational model of how strong demographic faultlines undermine team cohesion. Simulation Model. Practice Theory 16(2):175-191.
14. Flap H (1988) Conflict, Loyalty and Violence: The Effects of Social Networks on Behaviour (Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, Germany).
15. Frank KA, Fahrbach K (1999) Organization culture as a complex system: Balance and information in models of influence and selection. Organ. Sci. 10(3):253-277.
16. French JRP (1956) A formal theory of social power. Psych. Rev. 63(3):181-194.
17. Galtung J (1966) Rank and social integration: A multidimensional appraoch. Berger J, Zelditch M, Anderson B, eds. Sociological Theories in Progress (Houghton Mifflin, Boston), 145-198.
18. Harary F (1959) A criterion for unanimity in French's theory of social power. Cartwright D, ed. Studies in Social Power (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI), 168-182.
19. Harrison JR, Lin Z, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1229-1245.
20. Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface and deeplevel diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. 45(5):1029-1045.
21. Heider F (1967) Attitudes and cognitive organization. Fishbein M, ed. Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 39-41.
22. Homan AC, van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW (2007) Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse work groups. Group Dynam. Theory Res. Practice 11(2):79-94.
23. Ibarra H (1992) Homophily and differential returns-Sex-differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422-447.
24. Isenberg DJ (1986) Group polarization: A critical review and metaanalysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(6):1141-1151.
25. Jehn KA (1994) Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. Internat. J. Conflict Management 5(3):223-238.
26. Jehn KA, Bendersky C (2003) Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:187-242.
27. Jehn KA, Bezrukova K (2010) The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 112(1):24-42.
28. Kamada T, Kawai S (1989) An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inform. Processing Lett. 31(1):7-15.
29. Kandel DB (1978) Homophily, selction, and socialization in adolescent friendships. Amer. J. Sociol. 84(2):427-436.
30. Lau DC, Murnighan JK (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):325-340.
31. Lau DC, Murnighan JK (2005) Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Management J. 48(4):645-659.
32. Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK (1954) Friendship and social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Berger M, Abel T, Page CH, eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (Van Nostrand, New York), 18-66.
33. Lijphart A (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
34. Macy MW, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28(1):143-166.
35. McFarland D, Bender-deMoll S (2007) SoNIA (Social Network Image Animator). Accessed May 28, 2010, http://www .stanford.edu/group/sonia.
36. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L (1987) Homophily in voluntary organizations-Status distance and the composition of face-toface groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(3):370-379.
37. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415-444.
38. Miller GA (1956) The magical number 7, plus or minus 2-Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. 63(2): 81-97.
39. Milliken FJ, Martins LL (1996) Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management J. 21(2):402-433.
40. Molleman E (2005) Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning. Group Decision Negotiation 14(3):173-193.
41. Moody J (2001) Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(3):679-716.
42. Myers DG (1982) Polarizing effects of social interaction. Brandstätter H, Davis JH, Stocker-Kreichgauer G, eds. Group Decision Making (Academic Press, London), 125-161.
43. Myers DG, Lamm H (1976) The group polarization phenomenon. Psych. Bull. 83(4):602-627.
44. Nieuwbeerta P, Flap H (2000) Crosscutting social circles and political choice-Effects of personal network composition on voting behavior in the Netherlands. Soc. Networks 22(4):313-335.
45. Oh HS, Chung MH, Labianca G (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Management J. 47(6):860-875.
46. Pelled LH (1996) Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organ. Sci. 7(6):615-631.
47. Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1-28.
48. Phillips KW (2003) The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(1):3-13.
49. Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale MA, Gruenfeld DH (2004) Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(4):497-510.
50. Rink F, Jehn KA (2010) Divided we fall, or united we stand? How identity processes affect faultline perceptions and the functioning of diverse teams. Crisp RJ, ed. The Psychology of Social and Cultural Diversity (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 281-296. Ross EA (1920) The Principles of Sociology (Century Co., New York).
51. Ross EA (1920) The Principles of Sociology (Century Co., New York).
52. Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM (2003) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):195-222.
53. Sederberg PB, Howard MW, Kahana MJ (2008) A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psych. Rev. 115(4):893-912.
54. Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2006) When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Acad. Management J. 49(4):779-795.
55. Simmel G (1908) Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung (Duncker & Humbold, München, Germany).
56. Stasser G (1988) Computer-simulation as a research tool-The discuss model of group decision-making. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 24(5):393-422.
57. Stewart GL (2006) A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. J. Management 32(1):29-54.
58. van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58(1):515-541.
59. Vinokur A, Burnstein E (1978) Depolarization of attitudes in groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(8):872-885.
60. Webber SS, Donahue LM (2001) Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A metaanalysis. J. Management 27:141-162.
61. Weenig MWH (1999) Communication networks in the diffusion of an innovation in an organization. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 29(5): 1072-1092.
62. Wegge J, Roth C, Neubach B, Schmidt KH, Kanfer R (2008) Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. J. Appl. Psych. 93(6):1301-1313.
63. Williams KY, O'Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77-140.
64. Wimmer A, Lewis K (2010) Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):583-642.
65. Young P (2001) Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).