Why do faultlines matter? A computational model of how strong demographic faultlines undermine team cohesion

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 175-191

  Flache, Andreas ^a   Mäs, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agent based modeling; Demographic diversity; Demographic faultline; Social cohesion; Work team

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CORRELATION METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

AGENT-BASED MODELING; DEMOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY; DEMOGRAPHIC FAULTLINE; SOCIAL COHESION; WORK TEAMS;

FAILURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 39149145828     PISSN: 1569190X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2007.11.020     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abelson R.P. Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy. In: Frederiksen N., and Gulliksen H. (Eds). Contributions to Mathematical Psychology (1964), Rinehart Winston, New York 142-160
2. Axelrod R. The dissemination of culture - a model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1997) 203-226
3. Bowers C.A., Pharmer J.A., and Salas E. When member homogeneity is needed in work teams. A meta-analysis. Small Group Research 31 (2000) 305-327
4. Brass D.J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H.R., and Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal 47 (2004) 795-817
5. Byrne D. The Attraction Paradigm (1971), Academic Press, New York, London
6. Byrne D., Clore G.L., and Smeaton G. The attraction hypothesis: do similar attitudes affect anything?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1167-1170
7. Chatman J.A., Polzer J.T., Barsade S.G., and Neale M.A. Being different yet feeling similar: the influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work process and outcome. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (1998) 749-780
8. Chen F.F., and Kenrick D.T. Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 111-125
9. Early P.C., and Mosakowski E. Creating hybrid team cultures: an empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal 43 (2000) 26-49
10. Festinger L., Schachter S., and Back K. Social Pressures in Informal Groups (1950), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
11. A. Flache, M.W. Macy, Why more contact may increase cultural polarization, paper presented in Session Mathematical Sociology I at 101st Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, 2006, Reprint published at www.arXiv.org>physics/0604196.
12. A. Flache, M.W. Macy, K. Takács. What sustains stable cultural diversity and what undermines it? Axelrod and Beyond, paper presented in World Congress of Social Simulation 2006, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
13. Harrison J.R., and Carroll G. The dynamics of cultural influence networks. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 8 (2002) 5-30
14. Hegselmann R., and Krause U. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5 (2002). Available from:
15. Homans G.C. The Human Group (1951), Harcourt Press, New York
16. Isenberg D.J. Group polarization: a critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (1986) 1141-1151
17. Jager W., and Amblard F. Uniformity, bipolarization and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behavior with an agent-based simulation model of attitude change. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 10 (2005) 295-303
18. Jehn K.A., and Bezrukova K. A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 25 (2004) 703-729
19. Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., and Neale M.A. Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1999) 741-763
20. Kandel D.B. Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology 84 (1978) 427-436
21. Kerr N.L., and Tindale S.R. Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 55 (2004) 623-655
22. Kitts J. Social influence and the emergence of norms amid ties of amity and enmity. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 14 (2006) 407-422
23. Lau D.C., and Murnighan J.K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: the decompositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 23 (1998) 325-340
24. Lau D.C., and Murnighan J.K. Interactions within groups and subgroups: the effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal 48 (2005) 645-659
25. Lazarsfeld P.F., and Merton R.K. Friendship and social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. In: Berger M., Abel T., and Page C.H. (Eds). Freedom and Control in Modern Society (1954), Van Nostrand, New York, Toronto, London 18-66
26. Macy M.W., Kitts J., Flache A., and Benard S. Polarization and dynamic networks. A Hopfield model of emergent structure. In: Breiger R., Carley K., and Pattison P. (Eds). Dynamic Social Network Modelling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers (2003), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC 162-173
27. Mark N.P. Culture and competition: homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. American Sociological Review 68 (2003) 319-345
28. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., and Cook J.M. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (2001) 415-444
29. Milliken F.J., and Martins L.L. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Journal 21 (1996) 402-433
30. Molleman E. Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: do faultlines affect team functioning?. Group Decision and Negotiation 14 (2005) 173-193
31. Pelled L.H. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organization Science 7 (1996) 615-631
32. Pfeffer J. Organizational demography: implications for management. California Management Review 28 (1985) 67-81
33. Pilkington N.W., and Lydon J.E. The relative effect of attitude similarity and attitude dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction: investigating the moderating roles of prejudice and group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (1997) 107-116
34. Rainio K. A Stochastic Model of Social Interaction (1961), Munksgaard, Turku
35. Rainio K. Stochastic process of social interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2 (1961) 113-128
36. Rainio K. A Stochastic Theory of Social Contacts. A Laboratory Study and an Application to Sociometry (1962), Munksgaard, Turku
37. Rainio K. Social interaction as a stochastic learning process. Archives Europeennes de Sociologie 6 (1965) 68-88
38. Reagans R., and Zuckerman E.W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R& D teams. Organization Science 12 (2001) 502-517
39. Rogers E.M., and Bhowmik D.K. Homophily-Heterophily: relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly 34 (1970) 523-538
40. Rosenbaum M.E. Comment on a proposed two-stage theory of relationship formation: first, repulsion; then, attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1171-1172
41. Rosenbaum M.E. The repulsion hypothesis: on the nondevelopment of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1156-1166
42. Salzarulo L. A continuous opinion dynamics model based on the principle of meta-contrast. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9 (2006). Available from:
43. Smeaton G., Byrne D., and Murnen S.K. The repulsion hypothesis revisited: similarity irrelevance or dissimilarity bias?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1989) 54-59
44. Stewart G.L. A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management 32 (2006) 29-54
45. Tsuji R. Interpersonal influence and attitude change toward conformity in small groups: a social psychological model. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 26 (2002) 17-34
46. Vinokur A., and Burnstein E. Depolarization of attitudes in groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (1978) 872-885
47. Webber S.S., and Donahue L.M. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management 27 (2001) 141-162
48. Weisbuch G., Deffuant G., and Amblard F. Persuasion dynamics. Physica A 353 (2005) 555-575
49. Williams K.Y., and O'Reilly C.A. Demography and diversity in organizations. A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior 20 (1998) 77-140