What research on second language writing Tells Us and what it doesn't

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 523-538

  Hinkel, Eli ^a  

^a SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877791842     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (96)

1. Al-Khatib, M. (2001). The pragmatics of letter-writing. World Englishes, 20, 170-200
2. Aziz, Y. (1988). Theme-theme organization and paragraph structure in standard Arabic. Word, 39(3), 117-128
3. Basturkmen, H., & Lewis, M. (2002). Learner perspectives of success in an EAP writing course. Assessing Writing, 8, 31-46
4. Bouton, L. (1995). A cross-cultural analysis of the structure and content of letters of reference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 211-244
5. Carlson, S. (1988). Cultural differences in writing and reasoning skills. In A. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric (pp. 109-137). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
6. Carson, J. (2001). Second language writing and second language acquisition. In T. Silva & P. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 191-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
7. Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press
8. Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2005). Discourse-based approaches: A new framework for second language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 729-742). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum
9. Choi, Y. (1988). Text structure of Korean speakers' argumentative essays in English. World Englishes, 7, 129-142
10. Christie, F. (1999). Genre theory and ESL teaching: A systemic functional perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 759-763
11. Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum
12. Coffin, C., Curry, M., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education. London: Routledge
13. Connor-Linton, J. (1995). Looking behind the curtain: What do L2 composition ratings really mean? TESOL Quarterly, 29, 762-765
14. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.) (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press
15. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge
16. Cotterall, S., & Cohen, R. (2003). Scaffolding for second language writers: Producing an academic essay. ELT Journal, 57, 158-166
17. Crowhurst, M. (1980). Syntactic complexity and teachers' quality ratings of narrations and arguments. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 223-231
18. Cutting, J. (2000). Written errors of students in higher education and English native speaker students. In G. M. Blue, J. Milton, & J. Saville (Eds.), Assessing English for academic purposes (pp. 97-113). Oxford: Peter Lang
19. Ferris, D. (1995). Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most serious and frequent er rors? CATESOL Journal, 8(1), 41-62
20. Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339
21. Ferris, D. (2001). Teaching 'writing for proficiency' in summer school: Lessons from a foxhole. In J. Murphy & P. Byrd (Eds.), Understanding the courses we teach: Local perspectives on English language teaching (pp. 328-345). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
22. Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
23. Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2005). Teaching ESL composition (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
24. Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184
25. Field, Y., & Oi, Y.L.M. (1992). A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and Native speakers. RELC Journal, 23, 15-28
26. Flowerdew, L. (2000). Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal, 54, 369-378
27. Frodesen, J. (2001). Grammar in writing. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.) (pp. 233-248). Boston: Heinle & Heinle
28. Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London: Longman
29. Granger, S. (1998). The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 3-18). London: Longman
30. Granger, S., & Tribble, C. (1998). Learner corpus data in the foreign language classroom: Form-focused instruction and datadriven learning. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 199-209). London: Longman
31. Green, C., Christopher, E., & Lam, J. (2000). The incidence and defects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 99-113
32. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Reconstructing 'academic writing proficiency' In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 127-153). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
33. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1995). Rating nonnative writing: The trouble with holistic scoring. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 759-762
34. Hedgcock, J. (2005). Taking stock of research and pedagogy in L2 writing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 597-614). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
35. Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141-152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
36. Hinkel, E. (1995). The use of modal verbs as a reflection of cultural values. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 325-343
37. Hinkel, E. (1997). Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 360-386
38. Hinkel, E. (1999). Objectivity and credibility in L1 and L2 academic writing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 90-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
39. Hinkel, E. (2001a). Giving examples and telling stories in academic essays. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 12, 149-170
40. Hinkel, E. (2001b). Matters of cohesion in L1 and L2 academic texts. Applied Language Learning, 12, 111-132
41. Hinkel, E. (2002a). Second language writers' text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
42. Hinkel, E. (2002b). Teaching grammar in writing classes: Tenses and cohesion. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 181-198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
43. Hinkel, E. (2003a). Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L2 and L1 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 275-301
44. Hinkel, E. (2003b). Adverbial markers and tone in L1 and L2 students' writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1049-1068
45. Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
46. Hinkel, E. (2005). Analyses of L2 text and what can be learned from them. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 615-628). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
47. Hinkel, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 109-131
48. Hinkel, E. (2009). The effect of essay prompts and topics on the uses of modal verbs in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 667-683
49. Hornberger, N. H. (Ed.) (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
50. Indrasuta, C. (1988). Narrative styles in the writing of Thai and American students. In A. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric (pp. 206-227). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
51. Jenkins, S., & Hinds, J. (1987). Business letter writing: English, French, and Japanese. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 327-349
52. Johns, A. (1984). Textual cohesion and the Chinese speaker of English. Language Learning and Communication, 3, 69-74
53. Johns, A. (1990). Coherence as a cultural phenomenon: Employing ethnographic principles in the academic milieu. In U. Connor & A. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing (pp. 211-225). Alexandria, VA: TESOL
54. Johnson, P. (1992). Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Malay and English. RELC Journal, 23, 1-17
55. Juzwik, M., Curcic, S., Wolbers, K., Moxley, K., Dimling, L., & Shankland, R. (2006). Writing into the twenty-first century: An overview of research on writing, 1999-2004. Written Communication, 23(4), 451-476
56. Khalil, A. (1989). A study of cohesion and coherence in Arab EFL college students' writing. System, 17, 359-371
57. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge
58. Laufer, B. (2003). The influence of L2 on L1 collocational knowledge and L1 lexical diversity in written expression. In V. Cook (Ed.), Effects of second language learning on the first (pp. 19-31). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
59. Leki, I. (1992). Understanding ESL writers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann
60. Leki, I. (2007). Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum
61. Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Routledge
62. Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge
63. Luke, A. (2004). On the material consequences of literacy. Language and Education, 18(4), 331-335
64. Lunsford, A., & Lunsford, K. (2008). Mistakes are a fact of life: A national comparative study. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 781-806
65. McCretton, E., & Rider, N. (1993). Error gravity and error hierarchies. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 177-188
66. Markkanen, R., & Schroeder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schroder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3-20). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
67. Martin, J. (1992). English text: System and structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
68. Mauranen, A. (1996). Discourse competence: Evidence from thematic development in native and non-native texts. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 195-230). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
69. Met, M. (1998). Curriculum decision-making in content-based teaching. In F. Genesee & J. Cenoz (Eds.), Beyond bilingualism: Multilingualism and multilingual education (pp. 35-63). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
70. Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
71. Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Davison, C. (2001). English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity. Harlow: Longman
72. Mohan, B., & Lo, W. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 515-534
73. Montano-Harmon, M. (1991). Discourse features of written Mexican Spanish: Current research in contrastive rhetoric and its implications. Hispania, 74, 417-425
74. Myers, J. (2001). Self-evaluations of the 'stream of thought' in journal writing. System, 29, 481-488
75. Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
76. North, S. (1986). Writing in philosophy class: Three case studies. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(3), 225-262
77. Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press
78. Paltridge, B. (2004). State of the art review: Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37(2), 87-105
79. Poole, D. (1991). Discourse analysis in enthnographic research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 42-56
80. Reid, J. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
81. Santos, T. (1988). Professors' reactions to the academic writing of nonnative-speaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 69-90
82. Schleppegrell, M. (2002). Challenges of the science register for ESL students: Errors and meaning-making. In M. Schleppegrell & M. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages (pp. 119-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
83. Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
84. Schleppegrell, M., & Columbi, M. (2002). Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
85. Silva, T., & Brice, C. (2004). Research in teaching writing. ARAL, 70-106
86. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657-677
87. Snow, M. (2005). A model of academic literacy for integrated language and content instruction. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 693-712). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
88. Snow, M., & Brinton, D. (1997). The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman
89. Spack, R. (1997). The rhetorical construction of multilingual students. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 765-774
90. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
91. Taylor, G., & Chen, T. (1991). Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12, 319-336
92. Troia, G. (2007). Research in writing instruction: What we know and what we need to know. In M. Pressley, A. Billman, K. Perry, K. Reffitt, & J. Reynolds (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need (pp. 129-156). New York: Guilford
93. Vann, R., Lorenz, F., & Meyer, D. (1991). Error gravity: Response to errors in the written discourse of nonnative speakers of English. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing (pp. 181-196). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
94. Vann, R., Meyer, D., & Lorenz, F. (1984). Error gravity: A study of faculty opinion of ESL errors. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 427-440
95. Weigle, S. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
96. Widdowson, H. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press