Second language writing and second language acquisition

On Second Language Writing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 191-199

  Carson, Joan G ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071828161     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410600899-19     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of language learning. Language Learning, 28, 69--84.
2. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Cumming, A. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on writing. AnnualReview of Applied Linguistics, 18, 61-78.
4. Ellis, R. (1994). The study ofsecond language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Friedlander, A. (1990). Composing in English: Effects of first language on writing in English as a second language. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 109-125). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning.Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
7. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research.London: Longman.
8. Leki, I. (1991). Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis and writing pedagogies. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 123-143.
9. Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). “Completely different worlds�?: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 3-9.
10. O’Malley, J., & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186-214.
12. Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing.New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Schumann, J. (1977). Second language acquisition: The pidginization hypothesis. Language Learning, 26, 391-408.