Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance

EMBO Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1307-1321

  González Prieto, Román ^a   Muñoz Cabello, Ana M ^a   Cabello Lobato, María J ^a   Prado, Félix ^a  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

CDK; DNA checkpoints; DNA damage tolerance; homologous recombination; replication fork dynamics

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 6; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD52 PROTEIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA CLEAVAGE; DNA CONTENT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MITOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RECOMBINATION REPAIR;

CHROMATIN; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; MICROCOCCAL NUCLEASE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84877609865     PISSN: 02614189     EISSN: 14602075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2013.73     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Alabert C, Bianco JN, Pasero P (2009) Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint. EMBO J 28: 1131-1141
2. Alcasabas AA, Osborn AJ, Bachant J, Hu F, Werler PJ, Bousset K, Furuya K, Diffley JF, Carr AM, Elledge SJ (2001) Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat Cell Biol 3: 958-965
3. Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M (2004) The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J 23: 4868-4875
4. Barlow JH, Rothstein R (2009) Rad52 recruitment is DNA replication independent and regulated by Cdc28 and the Mec1 kinase. EMBO J 28: 1121-1130
5. Berens TJ, Toczyski DP (2012) Keeping it together in times of stress: checkpoint function at stalled replication forks. Mol Cell 45: 585-586
6. Bichara M, Meier M, Wagner J, Cordonnier A, Lambert IB (2011) Postreplication repair mechanisms in the presence of DNA adducts in Escherichia coli. Mutat Res 727: 104-122
7. Branzei D, Foiani M (2010) Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 208-219
8. Branzei D, Vanoli F, Foiani M (2008) SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 456: 915-920
9. Burgess RC, Lisby M, Altmannova V, Krejci L, Sung P, Rothstein R (2009) Localization of recombination proteins and Srs2 reveals anti-recombinase function in vivo. J Cell Biol 185: 969-981
10. Chen X, Niu H, Chung W-H, Zhu Z, Papusha A, Shim EY, Lee SE, Sung P, Ira G (2011) Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 1015-1019
11. Clemente-Ruiz M, Prado F (2009) Chromatin assembly controls replication fork stability. EMBO Rep 10: 790-796
12. Daigaku Y, Davies AA, Ulrich HD (2010) Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication. Nature 465: 951-955
13. Fabre F, Chan A, Heyer W-D, Gangloff S (2002) Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 16887-16892
14. Friedberg EC (2005) Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 943-953
15. Gangavarapu V, Prakash S, Prakash L (2007) Requirement of RAD52 Group Genes for Postreplication Repair of UV-Damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 27: 7758-7764
16. Gravel S, Chapman JR, Magill C, Jackson SP (2008) DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev 22: 2767-2772
17. Hashimoto Y, Chaudhuri AR, Lopes M, Costanzo V (2010) Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1305-1311
18. Hashimoto Y, Puddu F, Costanzo V (2011) RAD51-and MRE11-dependent reassembly of uncoupled CMG helicase complex at collapsed replication forks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 17-24
19. Heyer W-D, Ehmsen KT, Liu J (2010) Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 44: 113-139
20. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan G-L, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S (2002) RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135-141
21. Huertas P, Cortés-Ledesma F, Sartori AA, Aguilera A, Jackson SP (2008) CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455: 689-692
22. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, Carotenuto W, Liberi G, Bressan D, Wan L, Hollingsworth NM, Haber JE, Foiani M (2004) DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431: 1011-1017
23. Jachymczyk WJ, Chlebowicz E, Swietlinska Z, Zuk J (1977) Alkaline sucrose sedimentation studies of MMS-induced DNA single-strand breakage and rejoining in the wild type and in UV-sensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 43: 1-10
24. Karras GI, Jentsch S (2010) The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell 141: 255-267
25. Lehmann AR, Niimi A, Ogi T, Brown S, Sabbioneda S, Wing JF, Kannouche PL, Green CM (2007) Translesion synthesis: Y-family polymerases and the polymerase switch. DNA Repair 6: 891-899
26. Lettier G, Feng Q, de Mayolo AA, Erdeniz N, Reid RJD, Lisby M, Mortensen UH, Rothstein R (2006) The role of DNA double-strand breaks in spontaneous homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2: e194
27. Liberi G, Maffioletti G, Lucca C, Chiolo I, Baryshnikova A, Cotta-Ramusino C, Lopes M, Pellicioli A, Haber JE, Foiani M (2005) Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev 19: 339-350
28. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R (2004) Choreography of the DNA damage response. Cell 118: 699-713
29. Lisby M, Mortensen UH, Rothstein R (2003) Colocalization of multiple DNA double-strand breaks at a single Rad52 repair centre. Nat Cell Biol 5: 572-577
30. Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen UH (2001) Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 8276-8282
31. Lopes M, Foiani M, Sogo JM (2006) Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol Cell 21: 15-27
32. Lundin C, North M, Erixon K, Walters K, Jenssen D, Goldman ASH, Helleday T (2005) Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA doublestrand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 3799-3811
33. Martn-Parras L, Hernandez P, Martnez-Robles ML, Schvartzman JB (1992) Initiation of DNA replication in ColE1 plasmids containing multiple potential origins of replication. J Biol Chem 267: 22496-22505
34. Meister P, Taddei A, Vernis L, Poidevin M, Gasser SM, Baldacci G (2005) Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint. J Cell Biol 168: 537-544
35. Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770-774
36. Minca EC, Kowalski D (2010) Multiple Rad5 activities mediate sister chromatid recombination to bypass DNA damage at stalled replication forks. Mol Cell 38: 649-661
37. Moldovan G-L, Pfander B, Jentsch S (2007) PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 129: 665-679
38. Monje-Casas F, Prabhu VR, Lee BH, Boselli M, Amon A (2007) Kinetochore orientation during meiosis is controlled by aurora B and the monopolin complex. Cell 128: 477-490
39. Moynahan ME, Jasin M (2010) Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nature 11: 196-207
40. Osborn AJ (2003) Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev 17: 1755-1767
41. Papouli E, Chen S, Davies AA, Huttner D, Krejci L, Sung P, Ulrich HD (2005) Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol Cell 19: 123-133
42. Petermann E, Orta ML, Issaeva N, Schultz N, Helleday T (2010) Hydroxyurea-Stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol Cell 37: 492-502
43. Pfander B, Moldovan G-L, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S (2005) SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nat Cell Biol 37: 428-433
44. Piatti S, Lengauer C, Nasmyth K (1995) Cdc6 is an unstable protein whose de novo synthesis in G1 is important for the onset of S phase and for preventing a 'reductional' anaphase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 14: 3788-3799
45. Prakash L (1981) Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations. Mol Gen Genet 184: 471-478
46. Prakash L, Prakash S (1977) Isolation and characterization of MMS-sensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 86: 33-55
47. Putnam CD, Hayes TK, Kolodner RD (2009) Specific pathways prevent duplication-mediated genome rearrangements. Nature 460: 984-989
48. Putnam CD, Hayes TK, Kolodner RD (2010) Post-replication repair suppresses duplication-mediated genome instability. PLoS Genet 6: e1000933
49. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H (2008) Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 229-257
50. Schlacher K, Christ N, Siaud N, Egashira A, Wu H, Jasin M (2011) Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell 145: 529-542
51. Schmid M, Durussel T, Laemmli UK (2004) ChIC and ChEC. Mol Cell 16: 147-157
52. Sung P (1997) Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J Biol Chem 272: 28194-28197
53. Tercero JA, Diffley JF (2001) Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412: 553-557
54. Tercero JA, Longhese MP, Diffley JFX (2003) A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol Cell 11: 1323-1336
55. Tourriere H, Versini G, Cordon-Preciado V, Alabert C, Pasero P (2005) Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol Cell 19: 699-706
56. Vanoli F, Fumasoni M, Szakal B, Maloisel L, Branzei D (2010) Replication and recombination factors contributing to recombination-dependent bypass of DNA lesions by template switch. PLoS Genet 6: e1001205
57. Vazquez MV, Rojas V, Tercero JA (2008) Multiple pathways cooperate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA. DNA Repair 7: 1693-1704
58. Zheng L, Shen B (2011) Okazaki fragment maturation: nucleases take centre stage. J Mol Cell Biol 3: 23-30
59. Zhu Z, Chung W-H, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134: 981-994