Sequential processing in comprehension of hierarchical graphs

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 467-480

  Körner, Christof ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; READING; RECORDING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 3042511231     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.997     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ballard, D. H. (1991). Animate vision: an evolutionary step in computational vision. Journal of the Institute of Electronics, Information, and Communication Engineers, 74, 343-348.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain sciences, 22, 577-660.
3. Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1991). Visual information and valid reasoning. In W. Zimmermann, & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 9-24). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
4. Brooks, R. (1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2, 14-22.
5. Butler, D. L. (1993). Graphics in psychology: pictures, data, and especially concepts. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 81-92.
6. Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 75-100.
7. Czyzowicz, J., Pelc, A., & Rival, I. (1990). Drawing orders with few slopes. Discrete Mathematics, 82, 233-250.
8. Davey, B. A., & Priestley, H. A. (1990). Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
10. Feeney, A., Hola, A. K. W., Liversedge, S. P., Findley, J. M., & Metcalfe, R. (2000). How people extract information from graphs: evidence from a sentence-graph verification paradigm. In M. Anderson, P. Cheng, & V. Haarslev (Eds.), Diagrams 2000 (pp. 149-161). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of seeing and looking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Gattis, M. (2002a). Reading pictures: constraints on mapping conceptual and spatial schemas. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 223-245). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Gattis, M. (2002b). Structure mapping in spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development, 17, 1157-1183.
14. Goldin, G. A. (1985). Thinking scientifically and thinking mathematically: a discussion of the paper by Heller and Hungate. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 113-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Goldstone, R. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65, 231-262.
16. Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2002). Guiding attention produces inferences in diagram-based problem solving. In M. Hegarty, B. Meyer, & N. H. Narayanan (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 236-248). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Guri-Rozenblit, S. (1988). The interrelations between diagrammatic representations and verbal explanations in learning from social science texts. Instructional Science, 17, 219-234.
18. Hayhoe, M. M., Bensinger, D. G., & Ballard, D. H. (1998). Task constraints in visual working memory. Vision Research, 38, 125-137.
19. Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32 717-742.
20. Inhoff, A. W., Starr, M., Liu, W., & Wang, J. (1998). Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 101-106.
21. Körner, C., & Albert, D. (2002a). Comprehension of preference graphs. Psychologische Beiträge, 44, 504-511.
22. Körner, C., & Albert, D. (2002b). Speed of comprehension of visualized ordered sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 57-71.
23. Körner, C., & Gilchrist, I. D. Eye movements in a simple spatial reasoning task. Perception (in press).
24. Lewis, J. R. (1989). Training students to represent arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 521-531.
25. Lohse, G. L. (1997). The role of working memory on graphical information processing. Behaviour and Information Technology, 16, 297-308.
26. Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
27. Naglieri, J. A., Das, J. P., & Jarman, R. F. (1990). Planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive cognitive processes as a model for assessment. School Psychology Review, 19, 423-442.
28. Novick, L. R. (2001). Spatial diagrams: key instruments in the toolbox for thought. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 279-325). San Diego: Academic Press.
29. Novick, L. R., & Hmelo, C. E. (1994). Transferring symbolic representations across non-isomorphic problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1296-1321.
30. Novick, L. R., & Hurley, S. M. (2001). To matrix, network, or hierarchy: that is the question. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 158-216.
31. Novick, L. R., Hurley, S. M., & Francis, M. (1999). Evidence for abstract, schematic knowledge of three spatial diagram representations. Memory and Cognition, 27, 288-308.
32. Pelc, A., & Rival, I. (1991). Orders with level diagrams. European Journal of Combinatorics, 12, 61-68.
33. Rival, I. (1993). Reading, drawing, and order. In I. G. Rosenberg, & G. Sabidussi (Eds.), Algebras and orders (pp. 359-404). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Shah, P., & Carpenter, P. A. (1995). Conceptual limits in comprehending line graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 43-61.
35. Shah, P., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 690-702.
36. Silver, E. A. (1982). Problem perception, problem schemata, and problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3, 169-181.
37. Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176-192.
38. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 40a, 201-237.
39. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.