3′ truncation of the GPD1 promoter in saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved ethanol yield and productivity

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 79, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 3273-3281

  Ding, Wen Tao ^a   Zhang, Guo Chang ^a   Liu, Jing Jing ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOETHANOL FERMENTATIONS; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; ETHANOL PRODUCTIVITY; FERMENTATION RATE; GLUCOSE CONCENTRATION; TRANSCRIPTION LEVEL; VERY HIGH GRAVITY FERMENTATIONS; YEAST SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOETHANOL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLYCEROL; STRAIN;

YEAST;

BIOENGINEERING; BIOMASS POWER; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; PRODUCTIVITY; YEAST;

ALCOHOL; GLYCEROL; GLYCEROL 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE (NAD); GPD1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; FERMENTATION; GENE DELETION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PROMOTER REGION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; PROCEDURES;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BASE SEQUENCE; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GLYCEROL; GLYCEROL-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE (NAD+); PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE DELETION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TRANSFORMATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84877105466     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03319-12     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Nissen TL, Hamann CW, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. 2000. Anaerobic and aerobic batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants impaired in glycerol synthesis. Yeast 16:463- 474.
2. Albertyn J, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Prior BA. 1994. GPD1, which encodes glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, is essential for growth under osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and its expression is regulated by the high-osmolarity glycerol response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4135- 4144.
3. +) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and its comparison with GPD1. Mol. Microbiol. 17:95-107.
4. +-dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by GPD1 and GPD2 have distinct roles in osmoadaptation and redox regulation. EMBO J. 16:2179 -2187.
5. Rep M, Albertyn J, Thevelein JM, Prior BA, Hohmann S. 1999. Different signalling pathways contribute to the control of GPD1 gene expression by osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 145:715-727.
6. Bjorkqvist S, Ansell R, Adler L, Liden G. 1997. Physiological response to anaerobicity of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:128 -132.
7. Albers E, Larsson C, Liden G, Niklasson C, Gustafsson L. 1996. Influence of the nitrogen source on Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaerobic growth and product formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:3187-3195.
8. Rigoulet M, Aguilaniu H, Averet N, Bunoust O, Camougrand N, Grandier-Vazeille X, Larsson C, Pahlman IL, Manon S, Gustafsson L. 2004. Organization and regulation of the cytosolic NADH metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 256-257:73- 81.
9. Nevoigt E, Stahl U. 1997. Osmoregulation and glycerol metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 21:231-241.
10. Hohmann S. 2002. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:300 -372.
11. Luyten K, Albertyn J, Skibbe WF, Prior BA, Ramos J, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S. 1995. Fps1, a yeast member of the MIP family of channel proteins, is a facilitator for glycerol uptake and efflux and is inactive under osmotic stress. EMBO J. 14:1360 -1371.
12. Tamas MJ, Luyten K, Sutherland FC, Hernandez A, Albertyn J, Valadi H, Li H, Prior BA, Kilian SG, Ramos J, Gustafsson L, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S. 1999. Fps1p controls the accumulation and release of the compatible solute glycerol in yeast osmoregulation. Mol. Microbiol. 31: 1087-1104.
13. Hubmann G, Guillouet S, Nevoigt E. 2011. Gpd1 and Gpd2 fine-tuning for sustainable reduction of glycerol formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:5857-5867.
14. Nissen TL, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. 2000. Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab. Eng. 2:69 -77.
15. Guadalupe Medina V, Almering MJ, van Maris AJ, Pronk JT. 2010. Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:190 -195.
16. Guo ZP, Zhang L, Ding ZY, Shi GY. 2011. Minimization of glycerol synthesis in industrial ethanol yeast without influencing its fermentation performance. Metab. Eng. 13:49 -59.
17. Zhang A, Kong Q, Cao L, Chen X. 2007. Effect of FPS1 deletion on the fermentation properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 44:212-217.
18. Pagliardini J, Hubmann G, Bideaux C, Alfenore S, Nevoigt E, Guillouet SE. 2010. Quantitative evaluation of yeast's requirement for glycerol formation in very high ethanol performance fed-batch process. Microb. Cell Fact. 9:36. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-9-36.
19. Eriksson P, Alipour H, Adler L, Blomberg A. 2000. Rap1p-binding sites in the saccharomyces cerevisiae GPD1 promoter are involved in its response to NaCl. J. Biol. Chem. 275:29368 -29376.
20. Cao L, Zhang A, Kong Q, Xu X, Josine TL, Chen X. 2007. Overexpression of GLT1 in fps1{rectangle opengpd{rectangle open mutant for optimum ethanol formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomol. Eng. 24:638-642.
21. Gietz RD, Sugino A. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527-534.
22. Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
23. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH, Willems AR, Woods RA. 1995. Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast 11:355-360.
24. δ{rectangle open{rectangle openCT method. Methods 25: 402-408.
25. Zhang GC, Liu JJ, Ding WT. 2012. Decreased xylitol formation during xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to overexpression of water-forming NADH oxidase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 1081-1086.
26. Gancedo C, Gancedo JM, Sols A. 1968. Glycerol metabolism in yeasts. Pathways of utilization and production. Eur. J. Biochem. 5:165-172.
27. Duboc P, Schill N, Menoud L, van Gulik W, von Stockar U. 1995. Measurements of sulfur, phosphorus and other ions in microbial biomass: influence on correct determination of elemental composition and degree of reduction. J. Biotechnol. 43:145-158.
28. Hampsey M. 1998. Molecular genetics of the RNA polymerase II general transcriptional machinery. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:465-503.
29. Hahn S, Young ET. 2011. Transcriptional regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: transcription factor regulation and function, mechanisms of initiation, and roles of activators and coactivators. Genetics 189:705- 736.
30. Guzowski JF, Wagner EK. 1993. Mutational analysis of the herpes simplex virus type 1 strict late UL38 promoter/leader reveals two regions critical in transcriptional regulation. J. Virol. 67:5098 -5108.
31. Pereira FB, Guimaraes PM, Teixeira JA, Domingues L. 2010. Selection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for efficient very high gravity bioethanol fermentation processes. Biotechnol. Lett. 32:1655-1661.
32. Devantier R, Pedersen S, Olsson L. 2005. Characterization of very high gravity ethanol fermentation of corn mash. Effect of glucoamylase dosage, pre-saccharification and yeast strain. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 68: 622-629.
33. Pereira FB, Guimaraes PM, Teixeira JA, Domingues L. 2011. Robust industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity bioethanol fermentations. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 112:130 -136.