When seeing the forest reduces the need for trees: The role of construal level in attraction to choice

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 676-683

  Henderson, Marlone D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice overload; Choice paradox; Construal; Options; Representation; Similarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877071794     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anderson J.R. Retrieval of propositional information in long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:451-474.
2. Anderson J.R. A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1983, 22:261-295.
3. Ayduk Ö., Kross E. Enhancing the pace of recovery: self-distanced analysis of negative experiences reduces blood pressure reactivity. Psychological Science 2008, 19(3):229-231.
4. Brown R. How shall a thing be called?. Psychological Review 1958, 65(1):14.
5. Brown C.L., Carpenter G.S. Why is the trivial important? A reasons-based account for the effects of trivial attributes on choice. Journal Of Consumer Research 2000, 26:372-385.
6. Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (in press). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
7. Chernev A., Hamilton R. Assortment size and option attractiveness in consumer choice among retailers. Journal Of Marketing Research 2009, 46(3):410-420.
8. Dar R., Katz H. Action identification in obsessive-compulsive washers. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2005, 29(3):333-341.
9. Ehring T., Szeimies A., Schaffrick C. An experimental analogue study into the role of abstract thinking in trauma-related rumination. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2009, 47(4):285-293.
10. Förster J. Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: How global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2009, 138(1):88-111.
11. sys: The how and why of global and local processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2012, 21(1):15-19.
12. sys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry 2010, 21(3):175-197.
13. Freitas A.L., Gollwitzer P., Trope Y. The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2004, 40:739-752.
14. Fujita K., Roberts J.C. Promoting prospective self-control through abstraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46(6):1049-1054.
15. Fujita K., Trope Y., Liberman N., Levin-Sagi M. Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90:351-367.
16. Gilbert D.T., Killingsworth M.A., Eyre R.N., Wilson T.D. The surprising power of neighborly advice. Science 2009, 323(5921):1617-1619.
17. Goodman, J.K., Cryder, C.E., & Cheema, A. (in press). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753.
18. Henderson M.D. Psychological distance and group judgments: The effect of physical distance on beliefs about common goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2009, 35(10):1330-1341.
19. Iyengar S.S., Lepper M.R. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79:995-1006.
20. Kay P. Taxonomy and semantic contrast. Language 1971, 47(4):866-887.
21. Kim H.S., Drolet A. Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:373-382.
22. Kruglanski A.W., Shah J.Y., Fishbach A., Friedman R., Chun W., Sleeth-Keppler D. A theory of goal systems. Advances in experimental social psychology 2002, Vol. 34:331-378. Academic Press, San Diego, CA US. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
23. Ledgerwood A., Callahan S.P. The social side of abstraction: Psychological distance increases conformity to group norms. Psychological Science 2012, 23:907-913.
24. Ledgerwood A., Trope Y., Liberman N. Flexibility and consistency in evaluative responding: The function of construal level. Advances in experimental social psychology 2010, Vol. 43:257-295. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.P. Zanna, J.M. Olson (Eds.).
25. Levy S.R., Freitas A.L., Salovey P. Construing action abstractly and blurring social distinctions: Implications for perceiving homogeneity among, but also empathizing with and helping, others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83(5):1224-1238.
26. Liberman N., Sagristano M.D., Trope Y. The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2002, 38(6):523-534.
27. Liberman N., Trope Y. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75(1):5-18.
28. McCarthy R.J., Skowronski J.J. You're getting warmer: Level of construal affects the impact of central traits on impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2011, 47(6):1304-1307.
29. Medin D., Ortony A. Psychological essentialism. Similarity and analogical reasoning 1989, 179-195. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY US.
30. Mullen B., Pizzuto C., Foels R. Altering intergroup perceptions by altering prevailing mode of cognitive representation: "They look like people.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83(6):1333-1343.
31. Polman E. Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2012, 102:980-993.
32. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40(3):879-891.
33. Rosch E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1975, 104:192-233.
34. Rosch E., Mervis C., Gray W., Johnson D., Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 1976, 8:382-439.
35. Schank R.C., Abelson R.P. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding 1977, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ.
36. Scheibehenne B., Greifeneder R., Todd P.M. Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research 2010, 37:409-425.
37. Schmeichel B.J., Vohs K.D., Duke S. Self-control at high and low levels of mental construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2011, 2:182-189.
38. Schul Y. Integration and abstraction in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 44(1):45-54.
39. Schwartz B. The paradox of choice: Why more is less 2004, HarperCollins Publishers, New York, NY US.
40. Schwartz B., Ward A., Monterosso J., Lyubomirsky S., White K., Lehman D.R. Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83(5):1178-1197.
41. Semin G.R., Fiedler K. Relocating attributional phenomena within the language-cognition interface: The case of actor-observer perspectives. European Journal of Social Psychology 1989, 19:491-508.
42. Semin G.R., Gil de Montes L., Vlencia J.F. Communication constraints on the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2003, 39(2):142-148.
43. Shrout P.E., Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 2002, 7(4):422-445.
44. Strack F., Schwarz N., Gschneidinger E. Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985, 49(6):1460-1469.
45. Trope Y., Liberman N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 2010, 117(2):440-463.
46. Trope Y., Liberman N., Wakslak C. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2007, 17(2):83-95.
47. Vallacher R.R., Wegner D.M. What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review 1987, 94:3-15.
48. Vallacher R.R., Wegner D.M. Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 57(4):660-671.
49. Wakslak C.J. The experience of cognitive dissonance in important and trivial domains: A construal-level theory approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012, 48(6):1361-1364.
50. Woltin K., Corneille O., Yzerbyt V.Y., Förster J. Narrowing down to open up for other individuals' concerns: Empathic concern can be enhanced by inducing detailed processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2011, 47(2):418-424.
51. Worchel S. The effect of three types of arbitrary thwarting on the instigation to aggression. Journal of Personality 1974, 42:300-318.