In situ gel of metoprolol tartrate: Physicochemical characterization, in vitro diffusion and histological studies

Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 564-570

  Khan, S ^a   Gajbhiye, C ^a   Singhavi, D J ^a   Yeole, P ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Carbopol; hydroxypropyl methylcellulose; in situ gel; metoprolol tartrate; mucoadhesion

Indexed keywords

CARBOMER; HYDROXYPROPYLCELLULOSE; METOPROLOL TARTRATE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; DIFFUSION; DRUG BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG METABOLISM; DRUG PENETRATION; DRUG RELEASE; FLOW KINETICS; GEL; GELATION; MUCOADHESION; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84876922824     PISSN: 0250474X     EISSN: 19983743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.110608     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Zhou M, Donovan MD. Intranasal mucociliary clearance of putative bioadhesive polymer gels. Int J Pharm 1996;135:115-25.
2. Ahn BN, Kim SK, Shim CK. Proliposomes as an intranasal dosage form for the sustained delivery of Propranolol. J Control Rel 1995;34:203-10.
3. Schipper NG, Verhoef JC, Merkus FW. The nasal mucociliary clearance: Relevance to nasal drug delivery. Pharm Res 1991;8: 807-14.
4. Cohen S, Lohei E, Tregoa A, Pelea Y. A novel in situ forming ophthalmic drug delivery system from alginates undergoing gelation in the eye. J Control Rel 1997;44:201-8.
5. Majithiya RJ, Ghosh PK, Umrethia ML, Murthy RS. Thermoreversible mucoadhesive gel for nasal delivery of Sumatriptan. AAPS PharmaSciTech 2006;7:67.
6. Cao S, Zhang Q, Jian X. Preperation of ion activated in situ gel systems of Scopolamine hydrobromide and evaluation of its antimotion sickness efficacy. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2007;28:201-8.
7. Brian HB, Lefkcowitz RJ. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. In: Gilman AG, Thodore RW, Alan NS, editors. Adrenergic receptor antagonist. New York: Pergamon Press; 1991. p. 237-95.
8. Narendra C, Srinath MS, Babu G. Optimization of bilayer floating tablet containing Metoprolol tartrate as a model drug for gastric retention. AAPS PharmaSciTech 2006;7:34.
9. Nakhat PD, Kondawar AA, Rathi LG, Yeole PG. Development and in vitro evaluation of buccoadhesive tablets of Metoprolol tartrate. Indian J Pharm Sci 2008;70:121-4.
10. Rajinikanth PS, Sankar C, Mishra B. Sodium alginate microspheres of Metoprolol tartrate for intranasal systemic delivery: Development and evaluation. Drug Deliv 2003;10:21-8.
11. Charoo A, Kohli K, Ali A. Preparation of in situ forming ophthalmic gels of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis; in vitro and in vivo studies. J Pharm Sci 2003;92:407-13.
12. Lin HR, Sung KC. Carbopol/Pluronic phase change solutions for ophthalmic drug delivery. J Control Rel 2000;69:379-88.
13. Nakamuri K, Maitani Y, Lowman AM, Takayamak, Peppas NA, Nagai T. Uptake and release of Budesonide from mucoadhesive pH sensitive copolymers and their application to nasal delivery. J Control Rel 1999;61:329-35.
14. Balasubramanium J, Kant S, Pandit JK. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the gelrite gellan gum based ocular delivery system for Indomethacin. Acta Pharm 2003;53:251-61.
15. Srividya B, Amin PD, Cardoza RM. Sustained ophthalmic delivery of Ofloxacin from a pH triggered in situ gelling system. J Control Rel 2001;73:205-11.
16. Deem DE. Rheology of dispersed system, In Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Disperse Systems; Rieger MM, Banker GS, editors. Vol. 1, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1988. p. 367-425.
17. Choi HG, Jung TH, Ryu JM, Yoon SJ, Oh YK, Kim CK. Development of in situ gelling and mucoadhesive Acetaminophen liquid suppository. Int J Pharm 1998;185:33-44.
18. Yong CS, Choi JS, Quan QI, Rhee JD, Kim CK, Lim SJ, et al. Effect of sodium chloride on the gelation temperature, gel strength and bioadhesive force of poloxamer gels containing Diclofenac sodium. Int J Pharm 2001;26:195-205.
19. Han RY, Fang JY, Sung KC. Mucoadhesive buccal disc novel Nalbupine prodrug controlled delivery: Effect of formulation variables on drug release and mucoadhesive performance. Int J Pharm 1999;177:201-7.
20. Elhady SS, Mortada ND, Gehanne AS, Zaki NM, Taha RA. Development of in situ gelling and mucoadhesive Mebeverine hydrochloride solution for rectal administration. Saudi Pharm J 2003;11:159-71.
21. Maiteni Y, Uchida M, Takahashi S, Nakagaki NM, Nagai T. Effect of bile salts on the nasal mucosa: Membrane potential measurement. Int J Pharm 1991;69:21-7.
22. Maitani Y, Asano S, Takahashi S, Nakagaki M, Agai T. Permeability of Insulin entrapped in liposomes through the nasal mucosa of rabbits. Chem Pharm Bull 1992;40:1569-72.
23. Chavanpatil MD, Vavia PR. The influence of absorption enhancers on nasal absorption of Acyclovir. Eur J Pharm Biol 2004;57:483-7.
24. Yu S, Zhao Y. Nasal insulin delivery in the chitosan solution in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Pharm 2004;281:11-23.
25. Wadell C, Bjork E, Camber O. Nasal drug delivery-evaluation of an in vitro model using porcine nasal mucosa. Eur J Pharm Sci 1999;7:197-206.
26. Ugwoke MI, Agu RO, Jorissen M, Augustijns P, Sciot R, Verbeke N, et al. Toxicological investigations of the effects of carboxymethyl cellulose on ciliary beat frequency of human epithelial dells in primary suspension culture and in vivo on rabbit nasal mucosa. Int J Pharm 2000;201:33-51.