Systematic review of the accuracy of dual-source cardiac CT for detection of arterial stenosis in difficult to image patient groups

Radiology

Volumn 267, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 387-395

  Westwood, Marie E ^a   Raatz, Heike D I ^b   Misso, Kate ^a   Burgers, Laura ^c   Redekop, Ken ^c   Lhachimi, Stefan K ^c   Armstrong, Nigel ^a   Kleijnen, Jos ^d  

^a KLEIJNEN SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS LTD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DUAL SOURCE CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84876921474     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121136     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. UK coronary heart disease statistics 2009-10. British Heart Foundation Web site. http://www.bhf.org.uk/publications/viewpublication. aspx?ps=1001141. Published 2010. Accessed May 18, 2011.
2. Cooper A, Calvert N, Skinner J, et al. Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Web site. NICE Guideline CG95. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG95. Published March 2010. Accessed January 12, 2011.
3. Noto TJ Jr., Johnson LW, Krone R, et al. Cardiac catheterization 1990: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991;24(2):75-83.
4. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33(6):1756-1824.
5. Nilsson T, Lagerqvist B, Tornvall P. Coronary angiography of patients with a previous coronary artery by-pass operation is associated with a three times increased risk for neurological complications. A report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). Scand Cardiovasc J 2009;43(6):374-379.
6. Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess 2008;12(17):iii-iv, ix-143.
7. Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M. Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 2010;152(3):167-177.
8. Khan R, Rawal S, Eisenberg MJ. Transitioning from 16-slice to 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the as sessment of coronary artery disease: are we really making progress? Can J Cardiol 2009;25(9):533-542.
9. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York Web site. http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/SysRev/!SSL!WebHelp/SysRev3.htm. Published January 2009. Accessed January 12, 2011.
10. Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Handbook for DTA reviews. Cochrane Collaboration Web site. http://srdta.cochrane. org/handbook-dta- reviews. Published 2011. Accessed January 12, 2011.
11. Whiting P, Westwood M, Beynon R, Burke M, Sterne JA, Glanville J. Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(6):602-607.
12. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(8):529-536.
13. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews [abstr]. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25.
14. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58(10):982-990.
15. Harbord RM, Deeks JJ, Egger M, Whiting P, Sterne JA. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Biostatistics 2007;8(2):239-251.
16. Harbord RM, Whiting P. Metandi: metaanalysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata J 2009;9(2):211-229.
17. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:31.
18. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21(11):1539-1558.
19. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in metaanalyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557-560.
20. Pflederer T, Seltmann M, Marwan M, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S. Detection of coronary artery stenoses in patients with previous coronary revascularization by 128-slice dual source computed tomography. Abstract 953. Presented at the European Society of Cardiology, ESC Congress, August 28-September 1, 2010, Stockholm, Sweden [abstr]. Eur Heart J 2010;31(suppl): 152.
21. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Invest Radiol 2010;45(6):331-340.
22. Xu L, Yang L, Fan Z, Yu W, Lv B, Zhang Z. Diagnostic performance of 320-detector CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2011;21(5):936-943.
23. Gang S, Min L, Li L, et al. Evaluation of CT coronary artery angiography with 320-row detector CT in a high-risk population. Br J Radiol 2012;85(1013):562-570.
24. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 2008;29(6):766-776.
25. Brodoefel H, Tsiflikas I, Burgstahler C, et al. Cardiac dual-source computed tomography: effect of body mass index on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Invest Radiol 2008;43(10):712-718.
26. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multislice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28(19):2354-2360.
27. Lin CJ, Hsu JC, Lai YJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography in a population unselected for degree of coronary artery calcification and without heart rate modification. Clin Radiol 2010;65(2):109-117.
28. Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T, et al. Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(25):2393-2398.
29. Weustink AC, Neefjes LA, Kyrzopoulos S, et al. Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. Radiology 2009;253(3):672-680.
30. Marwan M, Pflederer T, Schepis T, et al. Accuracy of dual-source computed tomography to identify significant coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 2010;31(18):2230-2237.
31. Pflederer T, Marwan M, Renz A, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis by dual-source computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2009;103(6):812-817.
32. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Wang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: the effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective. Acta Radiol 2010;51(7):727-740.
33. Meng L, Cui L, Cheng Y, et al. Effect of heart rate and coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of the dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Korean J Radiol 2009;10(4):347-354.
34. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I, et al. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2008;247(2):346-355.
35. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006;16(12):2739-2747.
36. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A. Effectiveness of dual-source CT coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Radiology 2007;245(3):703-711.
37. Rist C, Johnson TR, Müller-Starck J, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using dual-source computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation. Invest Radiol 2009;44(3):159-167.
38. Rixe J, Rolf A, Erkapic D, et al. Usefulness of dual-source computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with arrhythmia: comparison to invasive angiography [abstr]. Eur Heart J Suppl 2009;30(206):P1364.
39. Tsiflikas I, Drosch T, Brodoefel H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality of cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with arrhythmia. Int J Cardiol 2010;143(1):79-85.
40. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B. Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(1):56-63.
41. Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C, et al. Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart 2008;94(7):848-854.
42. Yang ZY, Wang Q, Guo SX, Zhang Y, Fang XM, Cui ZM. Value of detecting in-stent restenosis by dual source coronary computed tomography coronary angiography [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2011;39(1):49-52.
43. Zhao L, Zhang Z, Fan Z, Yang L, Du J. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for dual source CT of the coronary stent: comparison of image quality, accuracy, and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 2011;77(3):436-442.
44. Weustink AC, Nieman K, Pugliese F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(7):816-824.
45. Blankenhorn DH, Curry PJ. The accuracy of arteriography and ultrasound imaging for atherosclerosis measurement: a review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1982;106(10):483-489.
46. Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood DR, et al. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 1979;91(3):350-356.
47. Roberts WC, Jones AA. Quantitation of coronary arterial narrowing at necropsy in sudden coronary death: analysis of 31 patients and comparison with 25 control subjects. Am J Cardiol 1979;44(1):39-45.
48. Grondin CM, Dyrda I, Pasternac A, Campeau L, Bourassa MG, Lespérance J. Discrepancies between cineangiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization. Circulation 1974;49(4):703-708.
49. Vlodaver Z, Frech R, Van Tassel RA, Edwards JE. Correlation of the antemortem coronary arteriogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 1973;47(1):162-169.
50. Arnoldi E, Ramos-Duran I, Abro JA, et al. Coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering: high diagnostic accuracy with low radiation dose [in German]. Radiologe 2010;50(6):500-506.
51. Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Drosch T, et al. Cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with severe coronary calcifications and a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2007; 1(3):143-151.
52. Chen BX, Ma FY, Wen ZY, et al. Diagnostic value of 128-slice CT coronary angiography in comparison with invasive coronary angiography [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2008;36(3):223-228.
53. Chen HW, Fang XM, Hu XY, et al. Efficacy of dual-source CT coronary angiography in evaluating coronary stenosis: initial experience. Clin Imaging 2010;34(3):165-171.
54. Chen SY, Su YS, Xie PY, Xu SL, Fang YQ, Huang AR. Clinical value of dual-source CT in evaluating coronary artery disease [in Chinese]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2010;30(9):2125-2127.
55. Fang XM, Chen HW, Hu XY, et al. Dualsource CT coronary angiography without heart rate or rhythm control in comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26(3):323-331.
56. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al. Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J 2008;29(24):3037-3042.
57. Heuschmid M, Burgstahler C, Reimann A, et al. Usefulness of noninvasive cardiac imaging using dual-source computed tomography in an unselected population with high prevalence of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2007;100(4):587-592.
58. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Busch S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol 2007;42(10): 684-691.
59. Nance JW Jr., Bastarrika G, Kang DK, et al. High-temporal resolution dual-energy computed tomography of the heart using a novel hybrid image reconstruction algorithm: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35(1):119-125.