Evaluation of CT coronary artery angiography with 320-row detector CT in a high-risk population

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 1013, 2012, Pages 562-570

  Gang, Sun ^a   Min, L ^a   Li, L ^a   Guo Ying, L ^a   Lin, X ^a   Qun, J ^a   Hua, Z ^a  

^a JINAN MILITARY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

320 ROW DETECTOR DYNAMIC VOLUME COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUDEN INDEX;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84860898910     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/90347290     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Maurovich-Horvat P, Hoffmann U, Pena AJ, Cury RC, et al. Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:373-9. (Pubitemid 43254917)
2. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, Schmid FT, De Vries L, Grass M, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005;234:86-97. (Pubitemid 39658373)
3. Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A, Schoepf UJ, Ohnesorge B, Knez A, et al. ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology 2001;220:712-17. (Pubitemid 32799979)
4. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006;241:378-85. (Pubitemid 44632882)
5. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, Razzini C, Tomassini M, Sperandio M, et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1043-8. (Pubitemid 38869423)
6. Matt D, Scheffel H, Leschka S, Flohr TG, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, et al. Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:567-73. (Pubitemid 47328537)
7. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ, van Ooijen P, Munne A, van Geuns RJ, et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 2001;357:599-603. (Pubitemid 32179614)
8. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, Anders K, Ulzheimer S, Ohnesorge B, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003;107:664-6. (Pubitemid 36222588)
9. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, Johnson T, Rist C, Leber A, et al. Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol 2006;41:436-42. (Pubitemid 44284191)
10. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Schroeder S, Claussen CD, et al. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2008;247:346-55.
11. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, Eichler K, Hammersting R, Dogan S, et al. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006;238:75-86. (Pubitemid 43010582)
12. Bastarrika G, Arraiza M, Arias J, Broncano J, Zudaire B, Pueyo JC, et al. Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality and optimal reconstruction interval. Radiologia 2009;51:376-84.
13. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, Laule M, Dubel HP, Schlattmann P, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 2009;120:867-75.
14. Hoe J, Toh KH. First experience with 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scanning with prospective electrocardiogram gating to reduce radiation dose. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:257-61.
15. Kitagawa K, Lardo A, Lima J, George R. Prospective ECG-gated 320 row detector computed tomography: implications for CT angiography and perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:201-8.
16. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Vorobiof G, Nallamshetty L, Mitsouras D, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:535-46.
17. Steigner ML, Otero HJ, Cai T, Mitsouras D, Nallamshetty L, Whitmore AG, et al. Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:85-90.
18. Coats AJ. Ethical authorship and publishing. Int J Cardiol 2009;131:149-50.
19. Morise A, Haddad W, Beckner D. Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 1997;102:350-6. (Pubitemid 27249101)
20. Knez A, Becker CR, Leber A, Ohnesorge B, Becker A, White C, et al. Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1191-4. (Pubitemid 33043857)
21. Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE, Chen MY, Mather R, Pearson GD, et al. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology 2010;254:698-706.
22. Herzog BA, Wyss CA, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Treyer V, et al. First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography. Heart 2009;95:1656-61.
23. Shah A, Gnoj J, Fisher V. Complications of selective coronary arteriography by the Judkins technique and their prevention. Am Heart J 1975;90:353-9.
24. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2354-60. (Pubitemid 47537778)
25. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006;296:403-11. (Pubitemid 44127524)
26. Agresti A. Dealing with discreteness: making "exact"confidence intervals for proportions, differences of proportions, and odds ratios more exact. Stat Methods Med Res 2003;12:3-21. (Pubitemid 36236204)
27. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, Laule M, Borges AC, Wernecke KD, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:407-15. (Pubitemid 46768571)
28. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, Becker C, von Ziegler F, Nikolaou K, et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1241-7. (Pubitemid 38452602)
29. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-7. (Pubitemid 41040301)
30. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, Dubinsky TJ, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 2008;248:431-7.
31. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss C, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29:191-7.
32. Rixe J, Rolf A, Conradi G, Moellmann H, Nef H, Neumann T, et al. Detection of relevant coronary artery disease using dual-source computed tomography in a high probability patient series: comparison with invasive angiography. Circ J 2009;73:316-22.
33. Weustink AC, Neefjes LA, Kyrzopoulos S, van Straten M, Neoh Eu R, Meijboom WB, et al. Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. Radiology 2009;253:672-80.
34. Weustink A, Mollet N, Neefjes L, van Straten M, Neoh E, Kyrzopoulos S, et al. Preserved diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography with reduced radiation exposure and cancer risk. Radiology 2009;252:53-60.
35. Bastarrika G, Lee Y, Huda W, Ruzsics B, Costello P, Schoepf U. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 2009;253:317-38.
36. Baumüller S, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Seifert B, et al. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose. Radiology 2009;253:56-64.
37. Huda W, Yoshizumi T, Hurwitz L, Goodman P. Computing effective doses from dose-length product in CT. Radiology 2008;248:321-2.
38. Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K, Flohr T, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2576-83.
39. Windecker S, Maier-Rudolph W, Bonzel T, Heyndrickx G, Lablanche JM, Morice MC, et al. Interventional cardiology in Europe 1995. Working Group Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 1999;20:484-95.
40. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F, et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1341-81. (Pubitemid 43998110)