Efficacy of dual-source CT coronary angiography in evaluating coronary stenosis: Initial experience

Clinical Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 165-171

  Chen, Hong wei ^a   Fang, Xiang ming ^a   Hu, Xiao yun ^a   Bao, Jian ^a   Hu, Chun hong ^b   Chen, Yin ^a   Yang, Zhen yu ^a   Alexander, Lerner ^c   Wu, Xiao qing ^a  

^a NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b THE FIRST AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c LAC USC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; Coronary artery disease; Dual source computed tomography

Indexed keywords

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIES; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DUAL SOURCE; DUAL-SOURCE CT CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; GOLD STANDARDS; HEART RATES; INTERMODALITY; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE; NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSTICS; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; SCREENING TOOL; STENOSES;

ANGIOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES;

HEART;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DUAL SOURCE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77952825190     PISSN: 08997071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006, 57:331-335.
2. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006, 16:1409-1415.
3. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001, 37:2170-2214.
4. Austen W, Edward J, Frye R, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad-hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975, 51:5-50.
5. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Roper T, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast enhanced retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001, 103:2535-2538.
6. Kopp F, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2002, 23:1714-1725.
7. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003, 107:664-666.
8. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, Eliseo A, et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 2004, 25:1043-1048.
9. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006, 241:378-385.
10. Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Maurovich-Horvat P, et al. Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 2006, 57:373-379.
11. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, et al. Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol 2006, 41:436-442.
12. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005, 26:1482-1487.
13. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Mieghem C, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005, 112:2318-2323.
14. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual-source ct coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006, 16:2739-2747.
15. Matt D, Scheffel H, Leschka S, et al. Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 189:567-573.
16. Pansini V, Remy-Jardin M, Tacelli N, et al. Screening for coronary artery disease in respiratory patients: comparison of single-and dual-source CT in patients with a heart rate above 70 bpm. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:2108-2119.
17. Reimann AJ, Rinck D, Birinci-Aydogan A, et al. Dual-Source Computed Tomography: Advances of Imporal Resolution in Coronary Plaque Imaging. Invest Radiol 2007, 42:196-203.
18. Lu G-M, Zhang L-J, Guo H, et al. Comparison of myocardial bridging by dual-Source CT with conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2008, 72:1079-1085.
19. Johnson TRC, Nikolaou K, Busch S, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Source Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease. Invest Radiol 2007, 42:684-691.
20. Boll DT, Hoffmann MH, Bossert AS, et al. New frontiers in coronary plaque imaging and characterization: polychromatic dual energy multidetector CT with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2005, (Suppl):SSD08-SSD09.