Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: The effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 727-740

  Zhang, Long Jiang ^a   Wu, Sheng Yong ^b   Wang, Jing ^a   Lu, Ying ^c   Zhang, Zhuo Li ^a   Jiang, Shi Sen ^a   Zhou, Chang Sheng ^a   Lu, Guang Ming ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Medical Imaging Institute of Tianjin   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; CT angiography; Tomography; X ray computed

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM SCORE; CHI-SQUARE TESTS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIES; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY STENOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL SOURCE; DUAL-SOURCE CT CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; GENERALIZED ESTIMATION EQUATIONS; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HEART RATES; HIGH SENSITIVITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; X-RAY COMPUTED;

ANGIOGRAPHY; CALCIUM; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES;

HEART;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IOHEXOL; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CALCINOSIS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CALCINOSIS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77955666638     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841851.2010.492792     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R, Decramer I, Van Hoe LR, Wijns W, et al. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta analysis. Radiology 2007;244:419-428
2. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, Schmid FT, De Vries L, Grass M, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005; 234:86-97.
3. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006; 241:378-385
4. Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Brodoefel H, Daferner U, Herberts T, Tsiflikas I, et al. Quantitative parameters to compare image quality of non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice, 64-slice and dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2009;19:584-590
5. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, Chan WL, Seyfarth MT, Liew HB, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 2006;151:1323.e1-6
6. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Leber A, Johnson T, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187: 111-117
7. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, van Mieghem C, Meijboom WB, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006;16:575-582
8. R opers D, Rixe J, Anders K, K ü ttner A, Baum U, Bautz W, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64-0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:343-348
9. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O ' Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-557
10. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pretest probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2739-2747
11. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2354-2360
12. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Busch S, Leber AW, Becker A, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol 2007;42:684-691 (Pubitemid 351325900)
13. Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Otsuka M, Pugliese F, van Mieghem C, et al. Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:786-794
14. Heuschmid M, Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Brodoefel H, Mysal I, Haeberle E, et al. Usefulness of noninvasive cardiac imaging using dual-source computed tomography in an unselected population with high prevalence of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:587-592 (Pubitemid 47225168)
15. Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T, Anders K, Kuettner A, Stilianakis NI, et al. Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2393-2398
16. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Schroeder S, Claussen CD, et al. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2008;247: 346-355
17. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, Stolzmann P, Plass A, et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 2008;29:766-776
18. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Guber I, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 2008; 94:1132-1137
19. Brodoefel H, Tsiflikas I, Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Thomas C, Schroeder S, et al. Cardiac dual-source computed tomography: effect of body mass index on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Invest Radiol 2008;43:712-718
20. Baum ü ller S, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Seifert B, et al. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose. Radiology 2009;253:56-64.
21. Meng L, Cui L, Cheng Y, Wu X, Tang Y, Wang Y, et al. Effect of heart rate and coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of the dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:347-354
22. Xu L, Yang L, Zhang Z, Li Y, Fan Z, Ma X, et al. Lowdose adaptive sequential scan for dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rate: comparison with retrospective ECG gating. Eur J Radiol 2009 Jul 10 [Epub ahead of print].
23. Zheng M, Li J, Xu J, Chen K, Zhao H, Huan Y. Dual-source computed tomographic coronary angiography: image quality and stenosis diagnosis in patients with high heart rates. Tex Heart Inst J 2009;36:117-124
24. Tsiflikas I, Brodoefel H, Reimann AJ, Thomas C, Ketelsen D, Schroeder S, et al. Coronary CT angiography with dual source computed tomography in 170 patients. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:161-165
25. Rixe J, Rolf A, Conradi G, Moellmann H, Nef H, Neumann T, et al. Detection of relevant coronary artery disease using dual-source computed tomography in a high probability patient series: comparison with invasive angiography. Circ J 2009;73:316-322
26. Achenbach S, Ropers U, Kuettner A, Anders K, Pflederer T, Komatsu S, et al. Randomized comparison of 64-slice single-and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:177-186 (Pubitemid 351447183)
27. Rist C, Johnson TR, Becker CR, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K. New applications for noninvasive cardiac imaging: dualsource computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2007;17(Suppl 6):F16-25.
28. Weustink AC, Neefjes LA, Kyrzopoulos S, van Straten M, Neoh Eu R, Meijboom WB, et al. Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. Radiology 2009;253:672-680
29. Araoz PA, Kirsch J, Primak AN, Braun NN, Saba O, Williamson EE, et al. Optimal image reconstruction phase at low and high heart rates in dual-source CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:837-845
30. Adler G, Meille L, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, Capderou A, Paul JF. Robustness of end-systolic reconstructions in coronary dual-source CT angiography for high heart rate patients. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1118-1123
31. Fang XM, Chen HW, Hu XY, Bao J, Chen Y, Yang ZY, et al. Dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate or rhythm control in comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26:323-331
32. Chai X, Zhang LJ, Zhou CS, Zhao YE, Huang W, Lu GM. Coronary artery imaging in patients with sinus tachycardia using dual-source CT: optimal reconstruction phase and the effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 2008;24:1311-1314 (in Chinese).
33. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A. Effectiveness of dual-source CT coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Radiology 2007,245:703-711
34. Menzel H, Schibilla H, Teunen D, editors. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Scheffel H, Husman L, Gä mperli O, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, et al. Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1583-1590 (Pubitemid 351798529)
35. Raff GJ, Gallagher MJ, O' Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-557
36. Ho JS, Fitzgerald SJ, Stolfus LL, Wade WA, Reinhardt DB, Barlow CE, et al. Relation of a coronary artery calcium score higher than 400 to coronary stenoses detected using multidetector computed tomography and to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101:1444-1447
37. Meyer BC, Werncke T, Hopfenm ü ller W, Raatschen HJ, Wolf KJ, Albrecht T. Dual energy CT of peripheral arteries: effect of automatic bone and plaque removal on image quality and grading of stenoses. Eur J Radiol 2008;68: 414 -22. Luxembourg: European Commission, 2000; Publication No. EUR 16262 EN.
38. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
39. Matt D, Scheffel H, Leschka S, Flohr TG, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, et al. Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:567-573
40. Piers LH, Dikkers R, Willems TP, de Smet BJ, Oudkerk M, Zijlstra F, et al. Computed tomographic angiography or conventional coronary angiography in therapeutic decisionmaking. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2902-2907
41. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, Nielsen CD, Nguyen SA, Savino G, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007;244: 112-120
42. Leschka S, Scheffel H, Husmann L, Gä mperli O, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, et al. Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1583-1590 (Pubitemid 351798529)
43. Frydrychowicz A, Pache G, Saueressig U, Fö ll D, Kotter E, Langer M, et al. Comparison of reconstruction intervals in routine ECG-pulsed 64-row-MSCT coronary angiography in frequency controlled patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007;30:79-84.