Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 191, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 56-63

  Oncel, Dilek ^a   Oncel, Guray ^a   Tastan, Ahmet ^a   Tamci, Batuhan ^a  

^a Izmir Sifa Hastanesi   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Coronary CT angiography; Coronary stents; Dual source CT

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; IOMEPROL; ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENT; DEVICE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; HYPERTENSION; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMOKING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VASCULAR PATENCY;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 46849097604     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3560     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Santoro GM, et al. Restenosis after coronary stenting in current clinical practice. Am Heart J 1998; 135:510-518
2. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 1999; 100:1872-1878
3. Schoenhagen P, Halliburton S, Stillman A, et al. Non-invasive imaging of coronary arteries: current and future role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2004; 232:7-17
4. Achenbach S. Computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:1919-1928
5. Ropers D. Multislice computer tomography for detection of coronary artery disease. J Interv Cardiol 2006; 19:574-582
6. Pugliese F, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem C, et al. Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents. RadioGraphics 2006; 26:887-904
7. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:951-959
8. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:2204-2210
9. Chabbert V, Carrie D, Bennaceur M, et al. Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Eur Radiol 2007; 17:1452-1463
10. Oncel D, Oncel G, Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography - initial experience. Radiology 2007; 242: 403-409
11. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology 2007; 245:416-423
12. Das KM, El-Menyar AA, Salam AM, et al. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology 2007; 245:424-432
13. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:256-268 [Erratum in Eur Radiol 2006; 16:1405]
14. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography: initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57:331-335
15. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:1409-1415
16. Siefarth H, Raupach R, Schaller S, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:721-726
17. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Flohr T, et al. Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 2003; 38:790-795
18. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee For Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51[suppl 4]:5-40
19. Seifarth H, Wienbeck S, Püsken M, et al. Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using dual-source CT. AJR 2007; 189:1317-1323
20. Commission of the European Communities. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000: EUR 16262 EN
21. Betsou S, Efstathopoulos EP, Katritsis D, Faulkner K, Panayiotakis G. Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures. Br J Radiol 1998; 71:634-639
22. Gonen M, Panageas KS, Larson SM. Statistical issues in analysis of diagnostic imaging experiments with multiple observations per patient. Radiology 2001; 221:763-767
23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174
24. Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE, et al. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol 2004; 39:27-33
25. Maintz D, Juergens KU, Wichter T, Grude M, Heindel W, Fischbach R. Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 830-835
26. Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R, et al. 64- versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 2006; 41:22-27
27. Schepis T, Koepfli P, Leschka S, et al. Coronary artery stent geometry and in-stent contrast attenuation with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:1464-1473
28. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:818-826
29. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:2739-2747
30. Lell MM, Panknin C, Saleh R, et al. Evaluation of coronary stents and stenoses at different heart rates with dual source spiral CT (DSCT). Invest Radiol 2007; 42:536-541
31. Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C, et al. Dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart 2007; Sep 19 [Epub ahead of print]
32. Groen JM, Greuter MJ, van Ooijen PM, Willems TP, Oudkerk M. Initial results on visualization of coronary artery stents at multiple heart rates on a moving heart phantom using 64-MDCT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006; 30:812-817
33. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006; 241: 378-385
34. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1081-1086
35. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary - a report of the American Collage of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practical Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2006; 114:700-752