Government, policy-making and the development of innovation system: The cases of Taiwanese pharmaceutical biotechnology policies (2000-2008)

Research Policy

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1053-1071

  Chung, Chao Chen ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; Innovation system; Pharmaceuticals; Policy making; RTDI policy; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; DRUG PRODUCTS;

EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS; INNOVATION SYSTEM; PHARMACEUTICAL BIOTECHNOLOGY; POLICY MAKING; TAIWAN; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84876857407     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. G.A. Almond, G.B. Powell Jr.; and R.J. Mundt Comparative Politics: A Theoretical Framework 1996 Harper Collins College Publishers New York
2. AmCham Taiwan Whilte Paper Tapei 2002 American Chamber of Commerce in Taipei Taipei
3. D.N. Ammons, C. Coe, and M. Lombardo Performance-comparison projects in local government: participants' perspectives Public Administration Review 61 2001 100 110 (Pubitemid 33604249)
4. E. Arnold Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations Research Evaluation 13 2004 3 17 (Pubitemid 38613437)
5. A. Barker, and B.G. Peters The Politics of Expert Advice: Creating, Using and Manipulating Scientific Knowledge for Public Policy 1993 Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh
6. M. Bennedsen, and S.E. Feldmann Lobbying legislatures The Journal of Political Economy 110 2002 919 946
7. A. Bergek, S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis Research Policy 37 2008 407 429
8. P. Biegelbauer National but/and/or European: the differentiation of EU-R&D policy S. Kuhlmann, M. Behrens, J. Edler, Changing Governance of Research and Technology Policy: the European Research Area 2003 Edward Elgar Cheltenham 165 190
9. D. Braun Organizing the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies Science and Public Policy 35 2008 227 239
10. J. Brink, M. McKelvey, and K. Smith Conceptualizing and measuring modern biotechnology J. Laage-Hellman, A. Rickne, M. McKelvey, The Economic Dynamics of Modern Biotechnology 2004 Edward Elgar Cheltenham 20 42
11. H.-Z. Cai Premier: the FTA between Taiwan and the US is the win-to-win arrangement () 2004 China Times Taipei
12. B. Carlsson A systems framework for the study of economic and social dynamics of biotechnology J.D.L. Mothe, J. Niosi, The Economic and Social Dynamics of Biotechnology 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers London 9 28
13. B. Carlsson, S. Jacobsson, N. Holm, and M.A. Rickne Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues Research Policy 31 2002 233 245
14. J. Chataway, J. Tait, and D. Wield Understanding company R&D strategies in agro-biotechnology: trajectories and blind spots Research Policy 33 2004 1041 1057
15. P.-R. Cho Lilly will end the 15 years of manufacturing in Taiwan the facilities whose output value is 60 million US dollars is searching for buyer () 2001 Economic Daily News Taipei
16. J. Chubb Interest Groups and the Bureaucracy: the Politics of Energy 1983 Stanford University Stanford, California
17. C.-C. Chung National, sectoral and technological innovation systems: the case of Taiwanese pharmaceutical biotechnology and agricultural biotechnology innovation systems (1945-2000) Science and Public policy 39 2012 271 281
18. M.D. Cohen, J.G. March, and J.P. Olsen A garbage can model of organizational choice Administrative Science Quarterly 17 1972 1 25
19. J.A. Colyvas From divergent meanings to common practices: the early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University Research Policy 36 2007 456 476 (Pubitemid 46679046)
20. G. Cox, and M. McCubbins The institutional determinants of economic policy outcomes Weatherhead Center for International Affairs Conference Harvard University 2000
21. G.W. Cox, and M.D. McCubbins Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives 2005 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
22. DCB The Yearbook of Pharmaceutical Industry 2005 2005 Development Center of Biotechnology Taipei
23. DCB The Yearbook of Pharmaceutical Industry 2007 2007 Development Center of Biotechnology Taipei
24. M. Dodgson, J. Mathews, T. Kastelle, and M.-C. Hu The evolving nature of Taiwan's national innovation systems: the case of biotechnology innovation networks Research Policy 37 2008 430 445
25. DOH, 2005. The announcement for the pharmaceutical data exclusivity of Me-Too drugs (). Bureau of Pharmaceutical Affairs. (Accessed on 14 Dec, 2010 from http://gmp.fda.gov.tw/portal-e1-cnt-page.php?button-num=e1&folder-id= 11&cnt-id=186&search-field=&search-word=&up-page=4).
26. DOH, 2012. About DOH Mission. Department of Health. (Accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://www.doh.gov.tw/EN2006/DM/mission.aspx?class-no=392&level- no=1).
27. D. Easton A Framework for Political Analysis 1965 Prentice-Hall NJ
28. R. Elgie What is divided government R. Elgie, Divided Government in Comparative Perspective 2001 Oxford University Press Oxford 1 20
29. R. Elmore Organizational modes of social program implementation M. Hill, The Policy Process: A Reader 1997 Prentice Hall Harlow 241 271
30. S. Fernandez, and R. Fabricant Methodological Pitfalls in privatization research: two cases from Florida's child support enforcement program Public Performance & Management Review 24 2000 133 144
31. C. Freeman Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan 1987 Pinter London
32. Genovate, 2010. Home page. Genovate. (Accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from www.genovate-bio.com/chinese/index.htm).
33. S. Giesecke The contrasting roles of government in the development of biotechnology industry in the US and Germany Research Policy 29 2000 205 223
34. V. Gilsing, and B. Nooteboomb Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: the case of pharmaceutical biotechnology Research Policy 35 2006 1 23 (Pubitemid 43184056)
35. K. Goldstein Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Participation in America 1999 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
36. C. Greenwald Group Power: Lobbying and Public Policy 1977 Praeger New York
37. S. Guennif, and S.V. Ramani Explaining divergence in catching-up in pharma between India and Brazil using the NSI framework Research Policy 41 2012 433 441
38. C. Hakim Research Design: Successful Designs for Social and Economic Research 2000 Routledge London
39. R.E. Herriott, and W.A. Firestone Multisite qualitative policy research: optimizing description and generalizability Educational Researcher 12 1983 14 19
40. Y.-T. Ho Developing Biotechnology () 2004 Linking Taipei
41. B. Hogwood, and L. Gunn Why "perfect implementation" are unattainable M. Hill, The Policy Process: A Reader 1997 Prentice Hall Harlow 217 226
42. S.V.D. Hove A rationale for science-policy interfaces Futures 39 2007 807
43. R.J. Hrebenar, and R.K. Scott Interest Group Politics in America 1982 Prentice-Hall London
44. A. Inzelt Private sector involvement in science and innovation policy-making in Hungary Science and Public Policy 35 2008 81 94
45. S. Jacobsson, and A. Bergek Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology Industrial and Corporate Change 13 1998 815 849
46. P. John Analysing Public Policy 1998 Pinter London
47. R. Kaiser, and H. Prange The reconfiguration of national innovation systems - the example of German biotechnology Research Policy 33 2004 395 408
48. J. Kingdon Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies 2003 HarperCollins New York
49. J. Kooiman Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions 1993 Sage London
50. J. Laage-Hellman, A. Rickne, and M. McKelvey The Economic Dynamics of Modern Biotechnology 2004 Edward Elgar Cheltenham
51. J.-E. Lane Implementation, accountability and trust M. Hill, The Policy Process: A Reader 1997 Prentice Hall Harlow 296 316
52. J.-E. Lane, and S. Ersson The New Institutional Politics: Performance and Outcomes 2000 Routledge London
53. J. Laurence, and J. O'Toole B.G. Peters, Inter-Organizational Relations in Implementation 2003 Sage London 234 244
54. M. Laver, and K.A. Shepsle Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary 1996 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
55. J.-P. Li The S&T budgets was heavily cut: the Minister of the Ministry of Economic Affairs searched for the negotiations with congress () 2005 Economic Daily News Taipei
56. S.-D. Li The premier expects American Chamber of Commerce in Taipei to accelerate the FTA between Taiwan and US () 2004 The United Daily News Taipei
57. S.-Y. Lin The premier promises to amend the law of pharmaceutical affairs () 2004 Economic Daily News Taipei
58. C.E. Lindblom The science of "Muddling Through" Public Administration Review 19 1959 79 88
59. C.E. Lindblom, and E.J. Woodhouse The Policy-Making Process 1993 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
60. B.-A. Lundvall National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interact 1992 Pinter London
61. LY, 2005. The meeting record of the Legislative Yuan. Legislative Yuan. (Accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://lis.ly.gov.tw/ttscgi/lgimg?@940604;0271;0292) .
62. LY, 2009. The Committee Record Legislative Yuan. Legislative Yuan. (Accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://lci.ly.gov.tw/doc/ communique%5Cfinal%5Cword%5C98%5C37%5CLCIDP-983701-00047.doc).
63. F. Malerba Secotral systems of innovation and production Research Policy 31 2002 247 264
64. F. Malerba Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues, and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe 2004 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
65. J. Markard, and B. Truffer Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework Research Policy 37 2008 596 615
66. J. May, and A. Wildavsky The Policy Cycle 1978 Sage Beverly Hills
67. P.J. May, B.D. Jones, B.E. Beem, A.E. Neff-Sharum, and M.K. Poague Policy coherence and component-driven policymaking: arctic policy in Canada and the United States Policy Studies Journal 30 2005 37 63 (Pubitemid 40345481)
68. M. McKelvey Evolutionary Innovations: the Business of Biotechnology 1996 Oxford University Press Oxford
69. M. McKelvey, L. Orsenigo, and F. Pammolli Pharmaceutical analyzed through the lens of a sectoral innovation system F. Malerba, Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues, and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe 2004 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 73 120
70. I.D. Miles, and P.N. Cunningham Smart Innovation: A Practical Guide to Evaluating Innovation Programmes 2006 Manchester Business School Manchester
71. R. Moe The president's cabinet J.P. Pfiffner, R.H. Davidson, Understanding the Presidency: 2004 Election Season Update 2005 Pearson Longman New York 197 223
72. MOEA Policy Goals and Guiding Principles 2012 Ministry of Economic Affairs (accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/english/content/ Content.aspx?menu-id=190)
73. M.E. Mogee Knowledge and politics in innovation policy design D. Roessner, Government Innovation Policy: Design, Implementation, Evaluation 1988 Macmillan in association with the Policy Studies Organization London 37 48
74. S. Monsma American Politics: A Systems Approach 1969 Rinehart & Winston New York-London Holt
75. R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis 1993 Oxford University Press Oxford
76. NSC Science and Technology Yearbook 2004 2004 National Science Council (accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://yearbook.stpi.org.tw/biotech/2-03-2.html)
77. NSC Science and Technology Yearbook 2008 2008 National Science Council Taipei
78. NSC Rules of Evaluation National Science Council 2009 (accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://210.241.21.133/DOC/4586/PLAN-20-2009100823003721.htm)
79. NSC Name List of Leaders. National Science and Technology Program for Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals 2010 (accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://npbp.m-w.com.tw/tw/pageContent.php?id=19&catalog-id=3)
80. NSC National Science Council Mid-term R&D Plans 2010 National Science Council (accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://210.241.21.133/DOC/2406/PLAN-10- 20051103162406193.htm)
81. NSC Mission of the National Science Council 2012 National Science Council (accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://web1.nsc.gov.tw/public/Data/113111584271. pdf)
82. OECD, 1999. Managing National Innovation Systems. OECD Publishing, OECD.
83. D.J. Palumbo Politics and evaluation D.J. Palumbo, The Politics of Program Evaluation 1987 Sage London 12 20
84. D.W. Parsons Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis 1995 Edward Elgar Cheltenham
85. G. Peters Managing horizontal government: the politics of co-ordination Public Administration 76 1998 295 311
86. J. Pfiffner The Modern Presidency 1994 St. Martin's Press New York
87. J. Pfiffner Can the president manage the government J.P. Pfiffner, R.H. Davidson, Understanding the Presidency: 2004 Election Season Update 2005 Pearson Longman New York 236 250
88. C. Pollitt Academic advice to practitioners-what is its nature, place and value within academia Public Money & Management 26 2006 257
89. W.W. Powell, D.R. White, K.W. Koput, and J. Owen-Smith Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of inter-organizational collaboration in the life sciences American Journal of Sociology 110 2005 901 975
90. T. Reiss, S. Hinze, and I.D. Lacasa Performance of European member states in biotechnology Science and Public Policy 31 5 2004 344 358 (Pubitemid 39428593)
91. R.A.W. Rhodes Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability 1997 Open University Press Buckingham
92. D.M. Ricci The Transformation of American Politics: the New Washington and the Rise of Think Tanks 1993 Yale University Press New Haven, London
93. A. Rich Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise 2005 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
94. L. Rotherberg Agenda setting at common cause A.J. Cigler, B.A. Loomis, Interest Group Politics 1991 CQ Press Washington, D.C. 131 150
95. P.A. Sabatier Policy change over a decade or more P.A. Sabatier, H.C. Jenkins-Smith, Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach 1993 Westview Oxford 143 173
96. A. Sadovnik Qualitative research and public policy F. Fischer, G. Miller, M. Sidney, Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods 2007 Taylor & Francis Ltd UK 349 368
97. D. Samuels Separation of powers C. Boix, S. Stokes, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics 2007 Oxford University Press Oxford 703 726
98. D. Schooler Science, Scientists, and Public Policy 1971 Collier-Macmillan London
99. R.F. Scott Interest group influence on rule making Administration & Society 29 1997 325 347
100. R.F. Scott, and M.K. Cornelius Interest group participation in rule making: a decade of change Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 2005 353 370
101. J. Senker An overview of biotechnology in Europe: firms, demand, government policy and research J. Laage-Hellman, A. Rickne, M. McKelvey, The Economic Dynamics of Modern Biotechnology 2004 Edward Elgar Cheltenham 99 132
102. J. Senker, C. Enzing, P.-B. Joly, and T. Reiss European exploitation of biotechnology - do government policies help Nature Biotechnology 18 2000 605 608 (Pubitemid 30415292)
103. P. Six, D. Leat, K. Seltzer, and G. Stocker Towards Holistic Governance: the New Reform Agenda 2002 Palgrave Basingstoke
104. S.S. Smith, J.M. Roberts, and R.J.V. Wielen The American Congress Cambridge 2006 Cambridge University Press New York
105. S. Steinmo, and J. Watts It's the institutions, stupid! Why comprehensive National Health Insurance always fails in America Journal @Health Politics, Policy and Law 20 1995 329 372
106. T.E. Stuart, S.Z. Ozdemir, and W.W. Ding Vertical alliance networks: the case of university-biotechnology-pharmaceutical alliance chains Research Policy 36 2007 477 498 (Pubitemid 46679049)
107. Sunten Product PDC-748. SunTen Phototech 2010 (accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://www.stpt.com.tw/eng/rd-pdc748.php)
108. J. Tait, and C. Lyall A new mode of governance for science, technology, risk and the environment C. Lyall, J. Tait, New Modes of Governance: Developing an Integrated Policy Approach to Science, Technology, Risk and the Environment 2005 Ashgate Burlington 177 188
109. R. Topf Science, public policy and authoritative of governmental process A. Barker, B.G. Peters, The Politics of Expert Advice: Creating, Using and Manipulating Scientific Knowledge for Public Policy 1993 Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh 103 118
110. J. Tournon The state as blind investor in fundamental research A. Barker, B.G. Peters, The Politics of Expert Advice: Creating, Using and Manipulating Scientific Knowledge for Public Policy 1993 Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh 91 102
111. A. Waluszewski, E. Baraldi, T. Shih, and Å. Linne Resource interfaces telling other stories about the commercial use of new technology: the embedding of biotech solutions in US, China and Taiwan The IMP Journal 3 2009 86 123
112. M.S. Weatherford The puzzle of presidential leadership: Persuasion, Bargaining, and policy consistency. Governance An International Journal of Policy and Administration 7 1994 135 164
113. C.-R. Wong, and Y.-Z. Huang Minister of Technology: there should be collegiate system for technology policies () 2005 Economic Daily News Taipei
114. J. Wong Re-making the developmental state in Taiwan: the challenges of biotechnology International Political Science Review 26 2005 169 191 (Pubitemid 40551599)
115. Xiu, R.-Y.; 2005. The budgets of the South Branch of the National Applied Research Laboratories was cut by the Legislative Yuan (). United News, Taipei.
116. Yang, J.-H.; 2004. The Law of Pharmaceutical Affairs is amended and gives five year protection to the data exclusivity of new medicines (). Central News Agency. (Accessed 15 Feb, 2012 from http://www.au.epochtimes.com/b5/4/9/22/ n668493.htm).
117. K. Yang Quantitative methods for policy analysis F. Fischer, G. Miller, M.S. Sidney, Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods 2007 Taylor & Francis Ltd UK 349 368
118. R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2009 Sage Los Angeles
119. L.G. Zucker, M.R. Darby, and M.B. Brewer Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises American Economic Review 88 1998 290 330