Collective academic supervision: A model for participation and learning in higher education

Higher Education

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 581-593

  Nordentoft, Helle Merete ^a   Thomsen, Rie ^a   Wichmann Hansen, Gitte ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Academic; Collective; Graduate supervision; Higher education; Learning; Participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876698386     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-012-9564-x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. AU. (2011). Studiemiljøundersøgelsen [Survey of students' experiences at Aarhus University]. Aarhus.
2. Bartley, K., Dimenäs, J., & Hallnäs, H. (2010). Student participation in higher education. Nordic Studies in Education, 30, 150-165.
3. Blass, E., Jasman, A., & Levy, R. (2012). Supervisor reflections on developing doctoralness in practice-based doctoral students. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 31-41.
4. Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). 'Peer learning' as pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 501-516.
5. Brew, A. (2010). Transforming academic practice through scholarship. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 105-116.
6. Caffarella, R., & Barnett, B. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39-51.
7. Carlgren, I. (2009). Commentary: Ca-studies of learning-From an educational perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 203-209. doi: 10. 1080/00313830902757618.
8. Chris, P. (2005). New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189-207.
9. Delamont, S., Atkonson, P., & Parry, O. (2004). Supervising the Doctorate: A guide to success (2nd ed.). NY: Open University Press.
10. Dreier, O. (1999). Personal trajectories of participation across contexts of social practice. Outlines, 1999(1), 5-32.
11. Egan, R., Stockley, D., Brouwer, B., Tripp, D., & Stechyson, N. (2009). Relationsships between area of academic concentration, supervisory style, student needs and best practices. Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 337-345.
12. Eley, A. R., & Jennings, R. (2005). Effective Postgraduate Supervision: Improving the Student/Supervisor Relationship. NY: Open University Press.
13. Eley, A., & Murray, R. (2009). How to be an Effective Supervisor: Best practice in research student supervision. NY: Open University Press.
14. Emilsson, U. M., & Johnsson, E. (2007). Supervision of supervisors: On developing supervision in postgraduate education. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 163-179.
15. Fisher, K. (2006). Peer support groups. In C. Denholm & T. Evans (Eds.), Doctorates downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 41-49). Camberwell, Victoria: Acer Press.
16. Grant, B., & Graham, A. (1994). Guidelines for discussion: a tool for managing postgraduate supervision. In: O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds.), Quality in Postgraduate Education. London: Kogan Page.
17. Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students' views of supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 41-53.
18. Heritage, J. (1997). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 222-245). London: Sage.
19. Hermansson, G. (1997). Boundaries and boundary management in counselling: The never-ending story. British Journal of Guidcance and Counselling, 25(2), 133-145.
20. Kandiko, C. B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2012). What is a doctorate? A concept-mapped analysis of process versus product in the supervision of lab-based PhDs. Educational Research, 54(1), 3-16.
21. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews-An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: CA Sage.
22. Lave, J. (2008). Epilogue: Situated learning and changing practice. In A. Amin & J. Roberts (Eds.), Community, Economic, Creativity, and Organization. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning, legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187-200.
25. Lillejord, S., & Dysthe, O. (2008). Productive learning spaces-a theoretical discussion based on two cases. Journal of Education and Work, 21(1), 75-89. doi: 10. 1080/13639080801957154.
26. Malfroy, J. (2005). Doctoral supervision, workplace research and the changing pedagogic practices. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(2), 165-178.
27. Manathunga, C. (2009). Supervision as a contested space: a response. Teaching in Higher EducatioTeaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 341-345.
28. Manathunga, C., & Goozee, J. (2007). Challenging the dual assumption of the 'always/already' autonomous student and effective supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 309-322.
29. Marsh-Piirainen, A., & Tainio, L. (2009). Collaborative game-play as a site for participation and situated learning of a second language. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 167-183. doi: 10. 1080/00313830902757584.
30. Martin, C. (2009). Relevance of situational context in studying learning as changing participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 133-149. doi: 10. 1080/00313830902757568.
31. McPhail, J., & Erwee, R. (2000). Developing professional relationships between supervisors and doctoral candidates. Australian Journal of Management and Organisational Behaviour, 3(1), 76-99.
32. Neumann, R. (2003). The doctoral education experience: Diversity and complexity. Canberra: Australian Department of Education Science and Training.
33. Nordentoft, H. M., & Kappel, N. (2011). Vulnerable participants in health research. Methodological and ethical challenges. Journal of Social Work Practice, 25(3), 365-376. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/02650533. 2011. 597188.
34. Parker, R. (2009). A learning community approach to doctoral education in the social sciences. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 43-54.
35. Pollner, M., & Emerson, R. M. (2001). Ethnomethodology and ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 118-135). London: Sage Publications.
36. Rienecker, L., & Hermansen, M. (2007). Udvikling af vejledning fra tavs viden og privatpraktiserende kultur til italesættelse of institutionalisering. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 3, 1-4.
37. Sapon-Shevin, M., & Chandler-Olcott, K. (2001). Communities of critique or dysfunctional families? Journal of Teacher Education, 52(5), 350-364.
38. Simons, P. (2005). An issue of isolation. In A. R. Eley & R. Jennings (Eds.), Effective postgraduate supervision: Improving the student-supervisor relationship (pp. 7-12). Maidenhead United Kingdom: Open University Press.
39. Stracke, E. (2010). Undertaking the journey together: Peer learning for a successful and enjoyable PhD experience. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 7(1). Article 8.
40. Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). A Handbook for Doctoral Supervisors. London: Routledge.
41. Thomsen, R. (2012). Career Guidance in Communities. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press. (in press).
42. Vehvilâinen, S. (2009). Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 185-201. doi: 10. 1080/00313830902757592.
43. Walker, M., & Thomson, P. (Eds.) (2010). The Routledge Doctoral Supervisor's Companion: Supporting effective research in Education and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
44. Wright, T., & Cochrane, R. (2000). Factors influencing successful submission of PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 181-195.