Computer-assisted TKA: Greater precision, doubtful clinical efficacy: Affirms

Orthopedics

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 678-

  Berend, Michael E ^a,b  

^a CENTER FOR HIP AND KNEE SURGERY   (United States)

^b Rose Hulman Biomedical Engineering Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ACCURACY; BODY MASS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMUR FRACTURE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; LONG TERM CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SHORT SURVEY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; TIBIA; TIBIA FRACTURE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; VARUS DEFORMITY; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349427486     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090728-24     Document Type: Short Survey

References (9)

1. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (428):26-34. (Pubitemid 39506147)
2. Green GV, Berend KR, Berend ME, Glisson RR, Vail TP. The effects of varus tibial alignment on proximal tibial surface strain in total knee arthroplasty: The posteromedial hot spot. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(8):1033-1039.
3. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87(1):18-28.
4. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation - preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001; 139(2):109-116. (Pubitemid 32424216)
5. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses - a comparative study with conventional instrumentation [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001; 139(2):117-119.
6. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (428):131-139. (Pubitemid 39506164)
7. Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA. Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11):2756-2762.
8. Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, et al. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(4):765-771.
9. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2008; 31(9):927-930.