Morphological contributions to adolescent word reading: An item response approach

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 39-60

  Goodwin, Amanda P ^a   Gilbert, Jennifer K ^a   Cho, Sun Joo ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876244615     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rrq.037     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams, R.J., Wilson, M., & Wu, M. (1997). Multilevel item response models: An approach to errors in variables regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(1), 47-76.
2. Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., & Bates, D.M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412. doi:10.1016/ j.jml.2007.12.005
3. Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Cortese, M.J., Hutchison, K.A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445-459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
4. Bar-Ilan, L., & Berman, R.A. (2007). Developing register differentiation: The Latinate-Germanic divide in English. Linguistics, 45(1), 1-35. doi:10.1515/LING.2007.001
5. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999375-39) [Computer software]. Available: cran.rproject.org/package=lme4
6. Bowers, P.N., Kirby, J.R., & Deacon, S.H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144-179. doi:10.3102/ 0034654309359353
7. Carlisle, J.F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Carlisle, J.F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24(3/4), 291-322. doi:10.1080/ 02702710390227369
9. Carlisle, J.F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464-487. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5
10. Carlisle, J.F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 239-253. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703-3
11. Carlisle, J.F., & Katz, L.A. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 669-693. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2
12. Carlisle, J.F., & Stone, C.A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 428-449. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3
13. Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
14. Cho, S-J., Partchev, I., & De Boeck, P. (2012). Parameter estimation of multiple item profile model. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 65(3), 438-466.
15. Cho, S-J., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2011). Alternating imputation posterior estimation of models with crossed random effects. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 55(1), 12-25. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2010.04.015
16. Deacon, S.H., & Kirby, J.R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just "more phonological"? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 223-238. doi:10.1017/S0142716404001110
17. de Jong, N.H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4/5), 329-365. doi:10.1080/01690960050119625
18. Dickinson, D.K., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., Peisner-Feinberg, E., & Poe, M. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschoolaged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 465-481. doi:10.1037/ 0022-0663.95.3.465
19. Ehri, L.C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 116-125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817. 1995.tb00077.x
20. Ehri, L.C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167-188. doi:10.1207/ s1532799xssr0902-4
21. Fowler, A., & Liberman, I. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Mor pholog ical aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Gilbert, J.K., Compton, D., & Kearns, D. (2011). Word and person effects on decoding accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 489-507. doi:10.1037/a0023001
23. Goodwin, A. (2011). Does meaning matter for reading achievement? Untangling the role of phonological recoding and morphological awareness in predicting reading and vocabulary achievement for Spanish-speaking English language learners. In P.J. Dunston, L.B. Gambrell, K. Headley, S.K. Fullerton, & P.M. Stecker (Eds.), 60th yearbook of the Literacy Research Association (pp. 77-94). Oak Creek, WI: Literacy Research Association
24. Goodwin, A.P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(2), 183-208. doi:10.1007/ s11881-010-0041-x
25. Gough, P.B. (1972). One second of reading. In J.F. Kavanagh & I.G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
27. Janssen, R., Schepers, J., & Peres, D. (2004). Models with item and item group predictors. In P. De Boeck & M. Wilson (Eds.), Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach (pp. 189-212). New York: Springer.
28. Kieffer, M.J., Biancarosa, G., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2012). Roles of morphological awareness in reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking language minority learners: Exploring partial mediation by vocabulary and reading fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000920
29. Kieffer, M.J., & Lesaux, N.K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 783-804. doi:10.1007/ s11145-007-9092-8
30. Kieffer, M.J., & Lesaux, N.K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00722.x
31. Kuo, L.J., & Anderson, R.C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161-180. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103-3
32. Laxon, V., Rickard, M., & Coltheart, V. (1992). Children read affixed words and non-words. The British Journal of Psychology, 83(3), 407-423. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02450.x
33. Mahony, D.L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing, 6(1), 19-44. doi:10.1007/BF01027276
34. Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing, 12(3/4), 191-218. doi:10.1023/A:1008136012492
35. McCutchen, D., Logan, B., & Biangardi-Orpe, U. (2009). Making meaning: Children's sensitivity to morphological information during word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 360-376. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.4.4
36. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2007). Mplus (Version 5.21) [Computer software]. Los Angeles: Authors.
37. Nagy, W.E., & Anderson, R.C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304-330. doi:10.2307/747823
38. Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 134-147. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134
39. Perfetti, C.A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D.S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 67-86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/ 10459-004
40. Perfetti, C.A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189-214). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
41. Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Cole, P. (2011). The role of form and meaning in the processing of written morphology: A priming study in French developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(4), 478-496. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.008
42. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43. Reichle, E.D., & Perfetti, C.A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 219-237. doi:10.1207/ S1532799XSSR0703-2
44. Roman, A.A., Kirby, J.R., Parrila, R.K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S.H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(1), 96-113. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.01.004
45. Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
48. Seymour, P.H.K. (1997). Foundations of orthographic development. In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: research, theory, and practice among languages (pp. 319-337). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Siegel, L.S. (2008). Morphological awareness skills of English language learners and children with dyslexia. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(1), 15-27. doi:10.1097/01.adt.0000311413.75804.60
50. Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing, 12(3/4), 219-252. doi:10.1023/A:1008196330239
51. Snijders, T.A.B., & Bosker, R.J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Snow, C., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
53. Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A(4), 745-765.
54. Tennessee Department of Education. (2011). TDOE report card. Nashville: Author. Retrieved August 28, 2011, from edu.reportcard.state.tn.us/ pls/apex/f?p=200:1:4463180647001600
55. Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., & Vermeer, A. (2011). Vocabulary growth and reading development across the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 8-25. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.536125
56. Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Zeno, S.M., Ivens, S.H., Millard, R.T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.