Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words

Reading and Writing

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 669-693

  Carlisle, Joanne F ^a   Katz, Lauren A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Derived word reading; Family frequency; Lexical representations; Word frequency

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748652684     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berninger, V. B., Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., Thomson, J., Hoffer, D., Abbott, S., Abbott, R., Richards, T., & Aylward, E. (2003). Effective treatment for children with dyslexia in grades 4-6: Behavioral and brain evidence. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 381-347). Baltimore: York Press.
2. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390-405.
3. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169-190.
4. Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428-449.
5. Carlisle, J. F., Stone, C. A., & Katz, L. A. (2001). The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249-274.
6. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). Word frequency book. New York: American Heritage Publishing Company.
7. Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Frederiksen, J. R., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 361-379.
10. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Leong, C. K. (1989). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 94-115.
12. Mann, V., & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-linguistic studies (pp. 1-25). New York: Kluwer Academic.
13. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. (1984). How many words in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
14. Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R., Schommer, M., Scott, J. A., & Stallman, A. C. (1989). Morphological families and word recognition. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262-282.
15. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 67-86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Reichle, E. D., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 219-237.
18. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simple words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 118-139.
19. Schreuder, R., Burani, C., & Baayen, H. (2003). Parsing and semantic opacity. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 159-189). New York: Kluwer Academic.
20. Singson, M., Mahoney, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219-252.
21. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
22. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263-272.
23. Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. G. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross language studies (pp. 113-137). New York: Kluwer Academic.
24. Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 293-316). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Verhoeven, L., Baayen, H., & Schreuder, R. (2004). Orthographic constraints and frequency effects in complex word identification. Written language and literacy, 7, 49-59.
26. Woodcock, R. W., & Mather, N. (2000). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.