A genetic polymorphism affecting reliance on personal versus public information in a spatial learning task in Drosophila melanogaster

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1760, 2013, Pages

  Foucaud, Julien ^a   Philippe, Anne Sophie ^a   Moreno, Celine ^a   Mery, Frederic ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Drosophila; Genetic polymorphism (foraging gene); Information use; Social interaction; Spatial learning

Indexed keywords

CONSPECIFIC; DECISION MAKING; ENTOMOLOGY; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; LEARNING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; POLYMORPHISM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84876006477     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0588     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Papaj DR, Lewis AC. 1993 Insect learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
2. Vreugdenhil E, Berezikov E. 2010 Fine-tuning the brain: microRNAs. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 31, 128-133. (doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.08.001)
3. Loebrich S, Nedivi E. 2009 The function of activityregulated genes in the nervous system. Physiol. Rev. 89, 1079-1103. (doi:10.1152/physrev.00013.2009)
4. Yamamoto A, Zwarts L, Callaerts P, Norga K, Mackay TFC, Anholt RRH. 2008 Neurogenetic networks for startle-induced locomotion in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12 393-12 398. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0804889105)
5. Hoppitt W, Laland KN. 2008 Social processes influencing learning in animals: a review of the evidence. In Advances in the study of behavior, vol. 38 (eds HJ Brockmann, TJ Roper, M Naguib, KE WynneEdwards, C Barnard, JC Mitani), pp. 105-165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Chabaud MA, Isabel G, Kaiser L, Preat T. 2009 Social facilitation of long-lasting memory retrieval in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 19, 1654-1659. (doi:10. 1016/j.cub.2009.08.017)
7. Valone TJ. 1989 Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation. Oikos 56, 357-363. (doi:10. 2307/3565621)
8. Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Wagner RH. 2004 Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305, 487-491. (doi:10. 1126/science.1098254)
9. Dall SRX, Giraldeau LA, Olsson O, McNamara JM, Stephens DW. 2005 Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 187-193. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010)
10. Robinson GE, Fernald RD, Clayton DF. 2008 Genes and social behavior. Science 322, 896-900. (doi:10. 1126/science.1159277)
11. Sokolowski MB. 2010 Social interactions in 'simple' model systems. Neuron 65, 780-794. (doi:10.1016/ j.neuron.2010.03.007)
12. Osborne KA, Robichon A, Burgess E, Butland S, Shaw RA, Coulthard A, Pereira HS, Greenspan RJ, Sokolowski MB. 1997 Natural behaviour polymorphism due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase of Drosophila. Science 277, 834-836. (doi:10.1126/science.277.5327.834)
13. Fitzpatrick MJ, Sokolowski MB. 2004 In search of food: exploring the evolutionary link between cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) and behaviour. Integr. Comp. Biol. 44, 28-36. (doi:10. 1093/icb/44.1.28)
14. Sokolowski MB. 1998 Genes for normal behavioural variation: recent clues from flies and worms. Neuron 21, 463-466. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80556-5)
15. Bell WJ, Tortorici C. 1987 Genetic and nongenetic control of search duration in adult of 2 morphs of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 33, 51-54. (doi:10.1016/0022-1910(87)90103-x)
16. Pereira HS, Sokolowski MB. 1993 Mutations in the larval foraging gene affect adult locomotory behavior after feeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5044-5046. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.90.11.5044)
17. Tortorici C, Bell WJ. 1988 Search orientation in adult Drosophila melanogaster: responses of rovers and sitters to resource dispersion in a food patch. J. Insect Behav. 1, 209-223. (doi:10.1007/ BF01052239)
18. Ben-Shahar Y, Leung H-T, Pak WL, Sokolowski MB, Robinson GE. 2003 cGMP-dependent changes in phototaxis: a possible role for the foraging gene in honey bee division of labour. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 2507-2515. (doi:10.1242/jeb.00442)
19. Bloch G, Grozinger CM. 2011 Social molecular pathways and the evolution of bee societies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 2155-2170. (doi:10.1098/rstb. 2010.0346)
20. Toth AL, Robinson GE. 2007 Evo-devo and the evolution of social behavior. Trends Genet. 23, 334-341. (doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.05.001)
21. Foucaud J, Burns JG, Mery F. 2010 Use of spatial information and search strategies in a water maze analog in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 5, e15231. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015231)
22. Ofstad TA, Zuker CS, Reiser MB. 2011 Visual place learning in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 474, 204-207. (doi:10.1038/nature10131)
23. Lindner MD. 1997 Reliability, distribution, and validity of age-related cognitive deficits in the Morris water maze. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 68, 203-220. (doi:10.1006/nlme.1997.3782)
24. Morris R. 1984 Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial-learning in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods 11, 47-60. (doi:10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4)
25. Fitzpatrick MJ, Feder E, Rowe L, Sokolowski MB. 2007 Maintaining a behaviour polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene. Nature 447, 210-215. (doi:10.1038/nature05764)
26. Vorhees CV, Williams MT. 2006 Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat. Protoc. 1, 848-858. (doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.116)
27. Diegelmann S, Zars M, Zars T. 2006 Genetic dissociation of acquisition and memory strength in the heat-box spatial learning paradigm in Drosophila. Learn. Mem. 13, 72-83. (doi:10.1101/ lm.45506)
28. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. 2000 Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. New York, NY: Springer.
29. Couzin ID. 2009 Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 36-43. (doi:10.1016/j. tics.2008.10.002)
30. Morand-Ferron J, Quinn JL. 2011 Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15 898-15 903. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1111560108)
31. Ward AJW, Herbert-Read JE, Sumpter DJT, Krause J. 2011 Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2312-2315. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1007102108)
32. Liker A, Bókony V. 2009 Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7893-7898. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0900042106)
33. Simons AM. 2004 Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 453-455. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.001)
34. Danchin E, Wagner RH. 1997 The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 342-347. (doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01124-5)
35. Valone TJ. 2007 From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 1-14. (doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0439-6)
36. Laland KN, Atton N, Webster MM. 2011 From fish to fashion: experimental and theoretical insights into the evolution of culture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 958-968. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0328)
37. Rieucau G, Giraldeau LA. 2011 Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 949-957. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0325)
38. Bailey NW. 2012 Evolutionary models of extended phenotypes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 561-569. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.011)
39. McGlothlin JW, Moore AJ, Wolf JB, Brodie ED. 2010 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 64, 2558-2574. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01012.x)
40. Moore AJ, Brodie ED, Wolf JB. 1997 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51, 1352-1362. (doi:10.2307/2411187)
41. Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Moore AJ. 1999 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am. Nat. 153, 254-266. (doi:10.1086/303168)
42. Deygout C, Gault A, Duriez O, Sarrazin F, Bessa-Gomes C. 2010 Impact of food predictability on social facilitation by foraging scavengers. Behav. Ecol. 21, 1131-1139. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arq120)
43. Krause J, Ruxton GD, Krause S. 2010 Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 28-34. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.016)
44. Kendal RL, Coolen I, van Bergen Y, Laland KN. 2005 Trade-offs in the adaptive use of social and asocial learning. In Advances in the study of behavior, vol. 35 (eds PJB Slater, CT Snowdon, HJ Brockmann, TJ Roper, M Naguib), pp. 333-379. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
45. Enquist M, Eriksson K, Ghirlanda S. 2007 Critical social learning: a solution to Rogers's paradox of nonadaptive culture. Am. Anthropol. 109, 727-734. (doi:10.1525/aa.2007.109.4.727)
46. Rendell L, Fogarty L, Laland KN. 2010 Rogers' paradox recast and resolved: population structure and the evolution of social learning strategies. Evolution 64, 534-548. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646. 2009.00817.x)
47. Sokolowski MB. 2001 Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 879-890. (doi:10. 1038/35098592)
48. Mery F, Belay AT, So AK-C, Sokolowski MB, Kawecki TJ. 2007 Natural polymorphism affecting learning and memory in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13 051-13 055. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0702923104)
49. Wang ZP, Pan YF, Li WZ, Jiang HQ, Chatzimanolis L, Chang JH, Gong ZF, Liu L. 2008 Visual pattern memory requires foraging function in the central complex of Drosophila. Learn. Mem. 15, 133-142. (doi:10.1101/lm.873008)
50. Reaume CJ, Sokolowski MB, Mery F. 2011 A natural genetic polymorphism affects retroactive interference in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 91-98. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1337)