Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 38, 2011, Pages 15898-15903

  Morand Ferron, Julie ^a   Quinn, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Animal innovation; Personality; Risk sharing; Sociality; Swarm intelligence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRD; FORAGING; GROUP DYNAMICS; HERD; NATURAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; PASSERINE; PREDATION RISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; MALE; PASSERIFORMES; POPULATION DENSITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; VIDEO RECORDING;

ANIMALIA; AVES;

EID: 80053164101     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111560108     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in Groups (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
2. Silk JB (2007) The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:539-559.
3. Beauchamp G (2010) Relaxed predation risk reduces but does not eliminate sociality in birds. Biol Lett 6:472-474.
4. Couzin ID (2009) Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn Sci 13:36-43.
5. Krause J, Ruxton GD, Krause S (2010) Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. Trends Ecol Evol 25:28-34.
6. Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 55:623-655.
7. Krause S, James R, Faria JJ, Ruxton GD, Krause J (2011) Swarm intelligence in humans: Diversity can trump ability. Anim Behav 81:941-948.
8. Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330:686-688.
9. Liker A, Bókony V (2009) Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:7893-7898.
10. Bouchard J, Goodyer W, Lefebvre L (2007) Social learning and innovation are positively correlated in pigeons (Columba livia). Anim Cogn 10:259-266. (Pubitemid 46465371)
11. Soma M, Hasegawa T (2004) The effect of social facilitation and social dominance on foraging success of budgerigars in an unfamiliar environment. Behaviour 141:1121-1134. (Pubitemid 40015517)
12. Coleman SL, Mellgren RL (1994) Neophobia when feeding alone or in flocks in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 48:903-907.
13. Lima SL, Zollner PA, Bednekoff PA (1999) Predation, scramble competition, and the vigilance group size effect in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:110-116. (Pubitemid 29350922)
14. Rieucau G, Giraldeau LA (2009) Group size effect caused by food competition in nutmeg mannikins (Lonchura punctulata). Behav Ecol 20:421-425.
15. Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16385-16389. (Pubitemid 39552854)
16. Pfeffer K, Fritz J, Kotrschal K (2002) Hormonal correlates of being an innovative greylag goose, Anser anser. Anim Behav 63:687-695.
17. Cole EF, Cram DL, Quinn JL (2011) Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. Anim Behav 81:491-498.
18. Laughlin PR, Hatch EC, Silver JS, Boh L (2006) Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. J Pers Soc Psychol 90:644-651. (Pubitemid 43825054)
19. Giraldeau LA, Caraco T (2000) Social Foraging Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton).
20. Gajdon GK, Fijn N, Huber L (2006) Limited spread of innovation in a wild parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis). Anim Cogn 9:173-181. (Pubitemid 43876975)
21. Coolen I (2002) Increasing foraging group size increases scrounger use and reduces searching efficiency in nutmeg mannikins (Lonchura punctulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:232-238.
22. Cresswell W, Quinn JL (2011) Predicting the optimal prey group size from predator hunting behaviour. J Anim Ecol 80:310-319.
23. Pulliam HR (1973) On the advantages of flocking. J Theor Biol 38:419-422.
24. Hinde RA (1952) The behaviour of the great tit (Parus major) and some other related species. Behaviour 2 (Suppl):1-201.
25. Fisher J, Hinde RA (1949) The opening of milk bottles by birds. Br Birds 42:347-357.
26. Estók P, Zsebo{combining double acute accent}k S, Siemers BM (2010) Great tits search for, capture, kill and eat hibernating bats. Biol Lett 6:59-62.
27. Overington SE, Morand-Ferron J, Boogert NJ, Lefebvre L (2009) Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds. Anim Behav 78:1001-1010.
28. Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Moss D (1995) Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus predation and feeding site selection by tits. Ibis 137:418-428.
29. Walther BA, Gosler AG (2001) The effects of food availability and distance to protective cover on the winter foraging behaviour of tits (Aves: Parus). Oecologia 129:312-320.
30. Morand-Ferron J, Cole EF, Rawles JEC, Quinn JL (2011) Who are the innovators? A field experiment with two passerine species. Behav Ecol, in press.
31. Reader SM (2003) Innovation and social learning: individual variation and brain evolution. Anim Biol 53:147-158.
32. Reader SM, Laland KN (2003) Animal innovation: An introduction. Animal Innovation, eds Reader SM, Laland KN (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp 3-35.
33. Voelkl B, Schrauf C, Huber L (2006) Social contact influences the response of infant marmosets towards novel food. Anim Behav 72:365-372. (Pubitemid 44148494)
34. Stöwe M, et al. (2006) Novel object exploration in ravens (Corvus corax): Effects of social relationships. Behav Proc 73:68-75. (Pubitemid 43786297)
35. Hilton GM, Ruxton GD, Cresswell W (1999) Choice of foraging area with respect to predation risk in redshanks: The effects of weather and predator activity. Oikos 87:295-302.
36. Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2006) Testing domains of danger in the selfish herd: Sparrowhawks target widely spaced redshanks in flocks. Proc Biol Sci 273:2521-2526. (Pubitemid 44444662)
37. Overington SE, Cauchard L, Morand-Ferron J, Lefebvre L (2009) Innovation in groups: Does the proximity of others facilitate or inhibit performance? Behaviour 146:1543-1564.
38. Reader SM, MacDonald K (2003) Environmental variability and primate behavioural flexibility. Animal Innovation, eds Reader SM, Laland KN (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp 83-116.
39. Burns JG, Dyer AG (2008) Diversity of speed-accuracy strategies benefits social insects. Curr Biol 18:R953-R954.
40. Keagy J, Savard J-F, Borgia G (2009) Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success. Anim Behav 78:809-817.
41. Laland KN (2004) Social learning strategies. Learn Behav 32:4-14.
42. King AJ, Cowlishaw G (2007) When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making. Biol Lett 3:137-139. (Pubitemid 351878162)
43. Bahrami B, et al. (2010) Optimally interacting minds. Science 329:1081-1085.
44. Kline MA, Boyd R (2010) Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania. Proc Biol Sci 277:2559-2564.
45. Gosler AG, Greenwood JJD, Baker JK, Davidson NC (1998) The field determination of body size and condition in passerines: A report to the British Ringing Committee. Bird Study 45:92-103. (Pubitemid 28129678)
46. Bolker BM, et al. (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127-135.
47. Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex).
48. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM(2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS (Springer, New York).
49. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: A practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 85:935-956.
50. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna).