Evolutionary models of extended phenotypes

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 561-569

  Bailey, Nathan W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; PHENOTYPE;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; HUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REVIEW;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS, POPULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84865861607     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.011     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. Dawkins R. The Extended Phenotype 1982, Oxford University Press.
2. Dawkins R. Extended phenotype - but not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka. Biol. Philos. 2004, 19:377-396.
3. Lewontin R.C. Gene, organism, and environment. Evolution from Molecules to Men 1983, 273-285. Cambridge University Press. D.S. Bendall (Ed.).
4. West-Eberhard M.J. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 1983, 58:155-183.
5. Turner J.S. The Extended Organism: The Physiology of Animal-Built Structures 2000, Harvard University Press.
6. Schaedelin F.C., Taborsky M. Extended phenotypes as signals. Biol. Rev. 2009, 84:293-313.
7. Wang J., et al. Genome-wide expression patterns and the genetic architecture of a fundamental social trait. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000127.
8. Hoover K., et al. A gene for an extended phenotype. Science 2011, 333:1401.
9. Shuster S.M., et al. Community heritability measures the evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects on community structure. Evolution 2006, 60:991-1003.
10. Rozen D.E., et al. Death and cannibalism in a seasonal environment facilitate bacterial coexistence. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:34-44.
11. Whitlock R., et al. Fine-scale community and genetic structure are tightly linked in species-rich grasslands. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2011, 366:1346-1357.
12. Andersen S.B., et al. The life of a dead ant: the expression of an adaptive extended phenotype. Am. Nat. 2009, 174:424-433.
13. Weber J.N., Hoekstra H.E. The evolution of burrowing behaviour in deer mice (genus Peromyscus). Anim. Behav. 2009, 77:603-609.
14. Logue D.M., et al. Does signaling mitigate the costs of agonistic interactions? A test in a cricket that has lost its song. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 277:2571-2572.
15. Mutic J.J., Wolf J.B. Indirect genetic effects from ecological interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:2371-2381.
16. van der Steen W. Niche construction: a pervasive force in evolution?. Behav. Brain Sci. 2000, 23:162-163.
17. Keller L. Changing the world. Nature 2003, 425:769-770.
18. Laland K.N., et al. Causing a commotion. Nature 2004, 429:609.
19. Laland K.N., Sterelny K. Perspective: seven reasons (not) to neglect niche construction. Evolution 2006, 60:1751-1762.
20. Brodie D.E. Caution: niche construction ahead. Evolution 2005, 59:249-251.
21. Hamilton W.D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 1964, 7:1-16.
22. Maynard-Smith J., Price G.R. The logic of animal conflict. Nature 1973, 246:15-18.
23. Bradbury J.W., Vehrencamp S.L. Economic models of animal communication. Anim. Behav. 2000, 59:259-268.
24. Lehtonen J., Kokko H. Positive feedback and alternative stable states in inbreeding, cooperation, sex roles and other evolutionary processes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2012, 367:211-221.
25. Crespi B.J. Vicious circles: positive feedback in major evolutionary and ecological transitions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:627-633.
26. Kokko H., López-Sepulcre A. The ecogenetic link between demography and evolution: can we bridge the gap between theory and data?. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:773-782.
27. Moore A.J., et al. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 1997, 51:1352-1362.
28. Kirkpatrick M., Lande R. The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 1989, 43:485-503.
29. Griffing B. Selection in reference to biological groups. I. Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1967, 20:127-142.
30. Griffing B. A theory of natural selection incorporating interaction between individuals. I. The modelling process. J. Theor. Biol. 1981, 89:635-658.
31. Brodie E.D. Why evolutionary genetics does not always add up. Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process 2000, 3-19. Oxford University Press. J.B. Wolf (Ed.).
32. Rodenburg T.B., et al. Selection method and early-life history affect behavioural development, feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens: a review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 110:217-228.
33. Wade M.J., et al. Group selection and social evolution in domesticated animals. Evol. Appl. 2010, 3:453-465.
34. Wolf J.B., et al. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am. Nat. 1999, 153:254-266.
35. McGlothlin J.W., et al. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 2010, 64:2558-2574.
36. Bleakley B.H., et al. The quantitative genetics of social behaviour. Social Behaviour 2010, 29-54. Cambridge University Press. T. Székely (Ed.).
37. Bailey N.W., Zuk M. Field crickets change mating preferences using remembered social information. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5:449-451.
38. Wilson A.J., et al. Indirect genetics effects and evolutionary constraint: an analysis of social dominance in red deer, Cervus elaphus. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:772-783.
39. Agrawal A.F., et al. On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. Am. Nat. 2001, 158:308-323.
40. Moore A.J., Pizzari T. Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes. Am. Nat. 2005, 165:S88-S97.
41. Miller C.W., Moore A.J. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:1279-1286.
42. Bailey N.W., Moore A.J. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations. Evolution 2012, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01647.x.
43. Kirkpatrick M., Barton N.H. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:1282-1286.
44. Qvarnström A., et al. Testing the genetics underlying the coevolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 2006, 441:84-86.
45. Odling-Smee F.J., et al. Niche construction. Am. Nat. 1996, 147:641-648.
46. Odling-Smee F.J., et al. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution 2003, Princeton University Press.
47. Laland K.N., et al. The evolutionary consequences of niche construction: a theoretical investigation using two-locus theory. J. Evol. Biol. 1996, 9:293-316.
48. Laland K.N., et al. Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:10242-10247.
49. Kenward B., et al. Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: inherited action patterns and social influences. Anim. Behav. 2006, 72:1329-1343.
50. Boni M.F., Feldman M.W. Evolution of antibiotic resistance by human and bacterial niche construction. Evolution 2005, 59:477-491.
51. Silver M., Di Paolo E. Spatial effects favour the evolution of niche construction. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2006, 70:387-400.
52. Rendell L., et al. Runaway cultural niche construction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2011, 366:823-835.
53. Ihara Y., Feldman M.W. Cultural niche construction and the evolution of small family size. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2004, 65:105-111.
54. Borenstein E., et al. Cultural niche construction in a metapopulation. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2006, 70:92-104.
55. Laland K.N., et al. Cultural niche construction and human evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 2001, 14:22-33.
56. Danchin E., et al. Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:475-486.
57. Laland K.N., et al. How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:137-148.
58. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1981, 78:3721-3725.
59. Anderson R.M., May R.M. Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I. Nature 1979, 280:361-367.
60. Darwin C.D. On the Origin of Species 1859, Harvard University Press.
61. Fawcett T.W., et al. Sex-ratio control erodes sexual selection, revealing evolutionary feedback from adaptive plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:15925-15930.
62. Sloan D.B., Panjeti V.G. Evolutionary feedbacks between reproductive mode and mutation rate exacerbate the paradox of sex. Evolution 2009, 64:1129-1135.
63. Queller D.C. Expanded social fitness and Hamilton's rule for kin, kith, and kind. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:10792-10799.
64. Lehmann L. The evolution of trans-generational altruism: kin selection meets niche construction. Evolution 2007, 20:181-189.
65. Lehmann L. The adaptive dynamics of niche constructing traits in spatially subdivided populations: evolving posthumous extended phenotypes. Evolution 2008, 62:549-566.
66. Schoener T.W. The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 2011, 331:426-429.
67. Pelletier F., et al. Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2009, 364:1483-1489.
68. Bull J.J., et al. Evolutionary feedback mediated through population density, illustrated with viruses in chemostats. Am. Nat. 2006, 167:E39-E51.
69. Fussmann G.F., et al. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:465-477.
70. Crawford G.W. Advances in understanding early agriculture in Japan. Curr. Anthropol. 2011, 52:S331-S345.
71. Iriki A., Taoka M. Triadic (ecological, neural, cognitive) niche construction: a scenario of human brain evolution extrapolating tool use and language from the control of reaching actions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2012, 367:10-23.
72. Ward T., Durrant R. Evolutionary psychology and the rehabilitation of offenders: constraints and consequences. Agg. Viol. Behav. 2011, 16:444-452.
73. Laland K.N., O'Brien M.J. Niche construction theory and archaeology. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 2010, 17:303-322.
74. Wells J.C.K. The thrifty phenotype as an adaptive maternal effect. Biol. Rev. 2007, 82:143-172.
75. Hadfield J.D., Wilson A.J. Multilevel selection 3: modeling the effects of interacting individuals as a function of group size. Genetics 2007, 177:667-668.
76. McGlothlin J.W., Brodie E.D. How to measure indirect genetic effects: the congruence of trait-based and variance-partitioning approaches. Evolution 2009, 63:1785-1795.
77. Teplitsky C., et al. Indirect genetic effects in a sex-limited trait: the case of breeding time in red-billed gulls. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23:935-944.
78. Bergsma R., et al. The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Genetics 2008, 178:1559-1570.
79. Chenoweth S.F., et al. Experimental evidence for the evolution of indirect genetic effects: changes in the interaction coefficient, Psi (Ψ), due to sexual selection. Evolution 2010, 64:1849-1856.
80. Hill P.S., et al. Singing from a constructed burrow: why vary the shape of the burrow mouth?. J. Orthop. Res. 2006, 15:23-29.
81. Muller J.K., et al. Carcass maintenance and biparental brood care in burying beetles: are males redundant?. Ecol. Entomol. 1998, 23:195-200.
82. Kim T.W., et al. A preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e422.
83. Yanoviak S.P., et al. Parasite-induced fruit mimicry in a tropical canopy ant. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:536-544.
84. Schaedelin F.C., Taborsky M. Mating craters of Cyathopharynx furcifer (Cichlidae) are individually specific, extended phenotypes. Anim. Behav. 2006, 72:753-761.
85. Blamires S.J. Plasticity in extended phenotypes: orb web architectural responses to variations in prey parameters. J. Exp. Biol. 2006, 213:3207-3212.
86. Wolf J.B., et al. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:64-69.
87. Fisher R.A. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen. Rev. 1915, 7:184-192.
88. Kent C., et al. Social context influences chemical communications in D. melanogaster males. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1384-1389.
89. Petfield D., et al. Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:6045-6050.
90. Bleakley B.H., Brodie E.D. Indirect genetic effects influence antipredator behavior in guppies: estimates of the coefficient of interaction psi and the inheritance of reciprocity. Evolution 2009, 63:1796-1806.
91. Bailey N.W., Zuk M. Socially flexible mate choice differs among populations of the Pacific field cricket: geographical variation in the interaction coefficient psi (Ψ). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:3589-3596.
92. Klein S.L. Parasite manipulation of the proximate mechanisms that mediate social behavior in vertebrates. Physiol. Behav. 2003, 79:441-449.
93. Kasumovic M.M., Brooks R.C. It's all who you know: the evolution of socially cued anticipatory plasticity as a mating strategy. Q. Rev. Biol. 2011, 86:181-197.