Grouping for inequity

International Journal of Inclusive Education

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 295-309

  MacQueen, Suzanne Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

achievement grouping; curriculum and instruction; mathematics; primary education literacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875897177     PISSN: 13603116     EISSN: 14645173     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2012.676088     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ainley, J., and S. Bourke. 1992. Student views of primary schooling. Research Papers in Education-Policy and Practice 7: 107-28.
2. Ansalone, G., and F. Biafora. 2004. Elementary school teachers' perceptions and attitudes to the educational structure of tracking. Education 125, no. 2: 249-58.
3. Beane, J.A. 1995. Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, no. 8: 616-22.
4. Blatchford, P., S. Edmonds, and C. Martin. 2003. Class size, pupil attentiveness and peer relations. British Journal of Educational Psychology 73, no. 2: 15-36.
5. Blatchford, P., V. Moriarty, S. Edmonds, and C. Martin. 2002. Relationships between class size and teaching: A multimethod analysis of English infant schools. American Educational Research Journal 39, no. 1: 101-32.
6. Blatchford, P., and P. Mortimore. 1994. The issue of class size for young children in schools: What can we learn from research? Oxford Review of Education 20, no. 4: 411-28.
7. Boaler, J. 1997a. Setting, streaming and mixed ability teaching. In Becoming a Teacher. Issues in Secondary Teaching, ed. Justin Dillon and Meg Maguire, 173-181. Buckingham: Open University Press.
8. Boaler, J. 1997b. Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex and setting. Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. Boaler, J., D. Wiliam, and M. Brown. 2000. Students' experiences of ability grouping-Disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal 26, no. 5: 631-48.
10. Burns, R.B., and D.A. Mason. 1998. Class formation and composition in elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal 35, no. 4: 739-72.
11. Charlton, E., M. Mills, W. Martino, and L. Beckett. 2007. Sacrificial girls: A case study of the impact of streaming and setting on gender reform. British Educational Research Journal 33, no. 4: 459-78.
12. Davies, J., and I. Brember. 1999. Boys outperforming girls: An 8-year cross-sectional study of attainment and self-esteem in Year 6. Educational Psychology 19, no. 1: 5-16.
13. Davies, J., S. Hallam, and J. Ireson. 2003. Ability groupings in the primary school: Issues arising from practice. Research Papers in Education 18, no. 1: 45-60.
14. Furrer, C., and E. Skinner. 2003. Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, no. 1: 148-62.
15. Gamoran, A. 1984. The institutionalization of educational stratification. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, August 26-30, in San Antonio.
16. Hallam, S., and J. Ireson. 2005. Secondary school teachers' pedagogic practices when teaching mixed and structured ability classes. Research Papers in Education 20, no. 1: 3-24.
17. Hallam, S., and J. Ireson. 2006. Secondary school pupils' preferences for different types of structured grouping practices. British Educational Research Journal 32, no. 4: 583-99.
18. Hallam, S., and J. Ireson. 2007. Secondary school pupils' satisfaction with their ability grouping placements. British Educational Research Journal 33, no. 1: 27-45.
19. Hallam, S., J. Ireson, and J. Davies. 2004a. Grouping practices in the primary school: What influences change? British Educational Research Journal 30, no. 1: 117-40.
20. Hallam, S., J. Ireson, and J. Davies. 2004b. Primary pupils' experiences of different types of grouping in school. British Educational Research Journal 30, no. 4: 515-33.
21. Hallam, S., J. Ireson, V. Lister, I. Andon Chaudhury, and J. Davies. 2003. Ability grouping practices in the primary school: A survey. Educational Studies 29, no. 1: 69-83.
22. Hallinan, M.T., and A.B. Sorensen. 1985. Ability grouping and student friendships. American Educational Research Journal 22, no. 4: 485-99.
23. Hanushek, E.A., 1999. Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR Experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21, no. 2: 143-63.
24. Haskins, R., T. Walden, and C.T. Ramey. 1983. Teacher and student behaviour in high-and low-ability groups. Journal of Educational Psychology 75, no. 6: 865-76.
25. Ireson, J., and S. Hallam. 2005. Pupils' liking for school: Ability grouping, self-concept and perceptions of teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75, no. 2: 297-311.
26. Jackson, B. 1964. Streaming. An education system in Miniature. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
27. Kulik, J.A., and C.-L.C. Kulik. 1982. Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal 19, no. 3: 415-28.
28. Kulik, J.A., and C.-L.C. Kulik. 1987. Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity and Excellence 23, nos. 1-2: 22-30.
29. Linchevski, L., and B. Kutscher. 1998. Tell me with whom you're learning, and I'll tell you how much you've learned. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29, no. 5: 533-54.
30. Liu, W.C., C.K.J. Wang, and E.J. Parkins. 2005. A longitudinal study of students' academic self-concept in a streamed setting: The Singapore context. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75, no. 4: 567-86.
31. MacIntyre, H., and J. Ireson. 2000. Within-class ability grouping: Misplacement and pupils' self-concepts. Paper given at annual conference of the British Educational Research Association, September 7-9, in Cardiff University, Cardiff.
32. MacIntyre, H., and J. Ireson. 2002. Within-class ability grouping: Placement of pupils in groups and self-concept. British Educational Research Journal 28, no. 2: 249-63.
33. McBride, J., and F. Silverman. 1991. Integrating elementary/middle school science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics 91, no. 7: 285-92.
34. Macqueen, S. 2010. Primary teacher attitudes in achievement-based literacy classes. Issues in Educational Research 20, no. 2: 118-36.
35. Macqueen, S. 2012. Academic outcomes from between-class achievement grouping: The Australian primary context. Australian Educational Researcher 39, no. 1: 59-73.
36. McNess, E., P. Broadfoot, and M. Osborn. 2003. Is the effective compromising the affective? British Educational Research Journal 29, no. 2: 243-57.
37. Meece, J.L., J. Eccles Parsons, C.M. Kaczala, S.B. Goff, and R. Futterman. 1982. Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin 91, no. 2: 324-48.
38. Molnar, A., P. Smith, J. Zahorik, A. Palmer, A. Halbach, and K. Ehrle. 1999. Evaluating the SAGE Program: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21, no. 2: 165-77.
39. Newmann, F.M., A.S. Bryk, and J. Nagaoka. 2001. Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict or coexistence. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
40. Ofsted. 1998. Setting in primary schools: A report from the Office of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools. London: Ofsted.
41. Opdenakker, M., and J. Van Damme. 2001. Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematics achievement. British Educational Research Journal 27, no. 4: 407-32.
42. Otto, H.J. 1950. Elementary education-III. Organization and administration. In Encyclopedia of educational research, ed. W.S. Monroe, 376-88. New York: MacMillan.
43. Pollard, A., M. Osborn, P. Croll, D. Abbott, and P. Broadfoot. 1991. Classroom change and pupil experience. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, April 3-7, in Chicago.
44. Rosenthal, R., and L. Jacobson. 1968. Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
45. Rubie-Davies, C., J. Hattie, and R. Hamilton. 2006. Expecting the best for students: Teacher expectations and academic outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology 76, no. 3: 429-44.
46. Slavin, R.E. 1987. Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 57, no. 3: 293-336.
47. Slavin, R.E. 1989. Class size and student achievement: Small effects of small classes. Educational Psychologist 24, no. 1: 99-110.
48. Slavin, R.E. 1996. Education for all. Exton, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.
49. Sorensen, A.B., and M.T. Hallinan. 1986. Effects of ability grouping on growth in academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal 23, no. 4: 519-42.
50. Sukhnandan, L., and B. Lee. 1998. Streaming, setting and grouping by ability: A review of the literature. Slough: NFER.
51. Tomlinson, C.A. 1999. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
52. Troman, G. 1988. Getting it right: Selection and setting in a 9-13 years middle school. British Journal of Sociology of Education 9, no. 4: 403-22.
53. Troman, G. 2008. Primary teacher identity, commitment and career in performative school cultures. British Educational Research Journal 34, no. 5: 619-33.
54. Venville, G.J., J. Wallace, L.J. Rennie, and J.A. Malone. 2002. Curriculum integration: Eroding the high ground of science as a school subject? Studies in Science Education 37: 43-84.
55. Wentzel, K.R., and K. Caldwell. 1997. Friendships, peer acceptance and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development 68, no. 6: 1198-209.
56. Whitburn, J. 2001. Effective classroom organisation in primary schools: Mathematics. Oxford Review of Education 27, no. 3: 411-28.
57. Wiliam, D., and H. Bartholomew. 2004. It's not which school but which set you're in that matters: The influence of ability grouping practices on student progress in mathematics. British Educational Research Journal 30, no. 2: 279-93.
58. Wright, S.P., S.P. Horn, and W.L. Sanders. 1997. Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11, 57-67.
59. Zohar, A., A. Degani, and E. Vaaknin. 2001. Teachers' beliefs about low-achieving students and higher order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education 17, no. 4: 469-85.