Empirically Valid Principles of Training

Training Cognition: Optimizing Efficiency, Durability, and Generalizability

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 13-39

  Healy, Alice F ^a   Schneider, Vivian I ^a   Bourne, Lyle E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875726388     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203816783     Document Type: Chapter

References (120)

1. Adams, J. A., & Hufford, L. E. (1962). Contributions of a part-task trainer to the learning and relearning of a time-shared flight maneuver. Human Factors, 4, 159-170.
2. Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 463-470.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 296-308.
5. Bahrick, H. P. (2005). The long-term neglect of long-term memory: Reasons and remedies. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 89-100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Battig, W. F. (1972). Intratask interference as a source of facilitation in transfer and retention. In R. F. Thompson & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Topics in learning and performance (pp. 131-159). New York: Academic Press.
7. Battig, W. F. (1979). The flexibility of human memory. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 23-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., McCoy, A. M., & Carr, T. H. (2004). Haste does not always make waste: Expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 373-379.
9. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Bjork, R. A. (2010, November). The dynamics of use and disuse in human memory. Keynote address at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
11. Bonk, W. J., & Healy, A. F. (2010). Learning and memory for sequences of pictures, words, and spatial locations: An exploration of serial position effects. American Journal of Psychology, 123, 137-168.
12. Bourne, L. E., Jr., & Archer, E. J. (1956). Time continuously on target as a function of distribution of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 25-33.
13. Bourne, L. E., Jr., Dodd, D. H., Guy, D. E., & Justesen, D. R. (1968). Response-contingent intertrial intervals in concept identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 601-608.
14. Bourne, L. E., Jr., Guy, D. E., Dodd, D. H., & Justesen, D. R. (1965). Concept identification: The effects of varying length and informational components of the intertrial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 624-629.
15. Bourne, L. E., Jr., Healy, A. F., Pauli, P., Parker, J. T., & Birbaumer, N. (2005). The influence of stimulus array on training of a speeded response. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 385-411.
16. Buck-Gengler, C. J., & Healy, A. F. (2001). Processes underlying longterm repetition priming in digit data entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 879-888.
17. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 273-281.
18. Carlson, R. A., & Yaure, R. G. (1990). Practice schedules and the use of component skills in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 484-496.
19. Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619-636.
20. Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268-276.
21. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642.
22. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380.
23. Clawson, D. M., Healy, A. F., Ericsson, K. A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2001). Retention and transfer of Morse code reception skill by novices: Part-whole training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 129-142.
24. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
25. Crutcher, R. J., & Healy, A. F. (1989). Cognitive operations and the generation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 669-675.
26. Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215-235.
27. Cull, W. L., Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1996). Expanding understanding of the expanding-pattern-of-retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 365-378.
28. Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Preblanc, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioral Brain Research, 72, 35-42.
29. Doane, S. M., Alderton, D. L., Sohn, Y. W., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1996). Acquisition and transfer of skilled performance: Are visual discrimination skills stimulus specific? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1218-1248.
30. Doane, S. M., Sohn, Y. W., & Schreiber, B. (1999). The role of processing strategies in the acquisition and transfer of a cognitive skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1390-1410.
31. Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 481-492.
32. Driskell, J. E., Willis, R. P., & Copper, C. (1992). Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 615-622.
33. Dutta, A., & Proctor, R. W. (1992). Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 801-809.
34. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
35. Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
36. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
37. Glenberg, A. M. (1976). Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 1-16.
38. Goode, M. K., Geraci, L., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Superiority of variable to repeated practice in transfer on anagram solution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 662-666.
39. Healy, A. F. (2007). Transfer: Specificity and generality. In H. L. Roediger, III, Y. Dudai, & S. M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Science of memory: Concepts (pp. 271-275). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (Eds.). (1995). Learning and memory of knowledge and skills: Durability and specificity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Healy, A. F., Clawson, D. M., McNamara, D. S., Marmie, W. R., Schneider, V. I., Rickard, T. C., … Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1993). The long-term retention of knowledge and skills. In D. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 30, pp. 135-164). New York: Academic Press.
42. Healy, A. F., Fendrich, D. W., Crutcher, R. J., Wittman, W. T., Gesi, A. T., Ericsson, K. A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1992). The long-term retention of skills. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 87-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Healy, A. F., Kole, J. A., Buck-Gengler, C. J., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2004). Effects of prolonged work on data entry speed and accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 188-199.
44. Healy, A. F., Shea, K. M., Kole, J. A., & Cunningham, T. F. (2008). Position distinctiveness, item familiarity, and presentation frequency affect reconstruction of order in immediate episodic memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 746-764.
45. Healy, A. F., Wohldmann, E. L., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2005). The procedural reinstatement principle: Studies on training, retention, and transfer. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 59-71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46. Healy, A. F., Wohldmann, E. L., Kole, J. A., Schneider, V. I., Shea, K. M., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (in press). Training for efficient, durable, and flexible performance in the military. In W. Arthur, Jr., E. A. Day, W. Bennett, Jr., & A. Portrey (Eds.), Individual and team skill decay: State of the science and implications for practice. New York: Taylor & Francis.
47. Healy, A. F., Wohldmann, E. L., Parker, J. T., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2005). Skill training, retention, and transfer: The effects of a concurrent secondary task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1457-1471.
48. Healy, A. F., Wohldmann, E. L., Sutton, E. M., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2006). Specificity effects in training and transfer of speeded responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 534-546.
49. Hintzman, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium (pp. 77-99). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
50. Hsiao, A. T., & Reber, A. S. (2001). The dual-task SRT procedure: Fine-tuning the timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 336-342.
51. Izawa, C. (1992). Test trial contributions to optimization of learning processes: Study/test trials interactions. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 1-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Kahana, M. J., & Howard, M. W. (2005). Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 159-164.
53. Karpicke, J. D., & Bauernschmidt, A. (2011). Spaced retrieval: Absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1250-1257.
54. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966-968.
55. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2010). Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? Memory & Cognition, 38, 116-124.
56. Karpicke, J. D., & Zaromb, F. M. (2010). Retrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 227-239.
57. Kohl, R. M., & Roenker, D. L. (1983). Mechanism involvement during skill imagery. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 179-190.
58. Kole, J. A., & Healy, A. F. (2007). Using prior knowledge to minimize interference when learning large amounts of information. Memory & Cognition, 35, 124-137.
59. Kole, J. A., & Healy, A. F. (2011). Memory for details about people: Familiarity, relatedness, and gender congruency. Memory & Cognition, 39, 637-648.
60. Kole, J. A., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2008). Cognitive complications moderate the speed-accuracy tradeoff in data entry: A cognitive antidote to inhibition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 917-937.
61. Kole, J. A., Healy, A. F., Fierman, D. M., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2010). Contextual memory and skill transfer in category search. Memory & Cognition, 38, 67-82.
62. Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 989-998.
63. Krueger, W. C. F. (1929). The effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 71-78.
64. Landauer, T. K., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625-632). New York: Academic Press.
65. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730-746.
66. Logan, G. D., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 179-195.
67. Lohse, K. R., Sherwood, D. E., & Healy, A. F. (2010). How changing the focus of attention affects performance, kinematics, and electromyography in dart throwing. Human Movement Science, 29, 542-555.
68. Lohse, K. R., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (in press). Attentional focus affects movement efficiency. In N.J. Hodges & M.A. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
69. Marmie, W. R., & Healy, A. F. (1995). The long-term retention of a complex skill. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.), Learning and memory of knowledge and skills: Durability and specificity (pp. 30-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70. Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., Kerr, E., & Weedon, E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1049-1068.
71. McDaniel, M. A., & Butler, A. C. (2011). A contextual framework for understanding when difficulties are desirable. In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 175-198). New York: Psychology Press.
72. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2005). Material appropriate difficulty: A framework for determining when difficulty is desirable for improving learning. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 73-85). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
73. McDaniel, M. A., & Fisher, R. P. (1991). Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 192-201.
74. McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Einstein, G. O. (2009). The read-recite-review study strategy: Effective and portable. Psychological Science, 20, 516-522.
75. McDaniel, M. A., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2007). Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 200-206.
76. McNamara, D. S., & Healy, A. F. (1995). A procedural explanation of the generation effect: The use of an operand retrieval strategy for multiplication and addition problems. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 399-416.
77. McNamara, D. S., & Healy, A. F. (2000). A procedural explanation of the generation effect for simple and difficult multiplication problems and answers. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 652-679.
78. Miles, J. D., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). Attention is required for acquisition but not expression of new response biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1554-1560.
79. Minas, S. C. (1978). Mental practice of a complex perceptual motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 4, 102-109.
80. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
81. Morris, P. E., & Fritz, C. O. (2000). The name game: Using retrieval practice to improve the learning of names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 124-129.
82. Nipher, F. E. (1878). On the distribution of errors in numbers written from memory. Transactions of the Academy of Science of St. Louis, 3, ccx-ccxi.
83. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3-8.
84. Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N. J., & Carpenter, S. K. (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 187-193.
85. Pellegrino, J. W., Doane, S. M., Fischer, S. C., & Alderton, D. (1991). Stimulus complexity effects in visual comparisons: The effects of practice and learning context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 781-791.
86. Proctor, R. W., & Dutta, A. (1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P.L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
88. Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 283-302.
89. Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225-254.
90. Roediger, H. L., III, Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger, III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209-1224.
92. Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2005). The effect of overlearning on long-term retention. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 361-374.
93. Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Blickensderfer, E. L. (1999). Enhancing reciprocity between training theory and practice: Principles, guidelines, and specifications. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 17, pp. 291-321). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
94. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
95. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
96. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
97. Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1998). Contextual interference effects in foreign language vocabulary acquisition and retention. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 77-90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
98. Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2002). What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 419-440.
99. Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., Buck-Gengler, C. J., Barshi, I., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2007, July). The effects of feedback on learning to follow navigation instructions. Poster presented at the joint meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society and the Psychonomic Society, Edinburgh, Scotland.
100. Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., Ericsson, K. A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1995). The effects of contextual interference on the acquisition and retention of logical rules. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.), Learning and memory of knowledge and skills: Durability and specificity (pp. 95-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
101. Shanks, D. R., & Cameron, A. (2000). The effect of mental practice on performance in a sequential reaction time task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 305-313.
102. Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (1999). Enhancing motor learning through external-focus instructions and feedback. Human Movement Science, 18, 553-571.
103. Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
104. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
105. Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203-220.
106. Smith, T. A., & Kimball, D. R. (2010). Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 80-95.
107. Storm, B. C., Bjork, R. A., & Storm, J. C. (2010). Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention. Memory & Cognition, 38, 244-253.
108. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
109. Underwood, B. J., & Ekstrand, B. R. (1967). Studies of distributed practice: XXIV. Differentiation and proactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 574-580.
110. Van Overschelde, J. P., & Healy, A. F. (2001). Learning of nondomain facts in high-and low-knowledge domains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1160-1171.
111. Wightman, D. & Lintern, G. (1985). Part-task training for tracking and manual control. Human Factors, 27, 267-283.
112. Wohldmann, E. L., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2007). Pushing the limits of imagination: Mental practice for learning sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 254-261.
113. Wohldmann, E. L., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2008a). A mental practice superiority effect: Less retroactive interference and more transfer than physical practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 823-833.
114. Wohldmann, E. L., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2008b). Global inhibition and midcourse corrections in speeded aiming. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1228-1235.
115. Wohldmann, E. L., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2010). Task integration in time production. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1130-1143.
116. Wulf, G. (2007). Attention and motor skill learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
117. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 987-1006.
118. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 185-211.
119. Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., & Whitacre, C. A. (1998). Physical-guidance benefits in learning a complex motor skill, Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 367-380.
120. Young, M. D., Healy, A. F., Gonzalez, C., Dutt, V., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2011). Effects of training with added difficulties on RADAR detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 395-407.