Attention Is Required for Acquisition but Not Expression of New Response Biases

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1554-1560

  Miles, James D ^a   Proctor, Robert W ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automaticity; Response biases; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78249276830     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020603     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baddeley A.D., Lewis V., Eldridge M., Thomson N. Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1984, 113:518-540. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.518.
2. Bae G.Y., Choi J.M., Cho Y.S., Proctor R.W. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1506-1521. doi: 10.1037/a0017257.
3. Barber P., O'Leary M. The relevance of salience: Towards an activation account of irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility effects. Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility 1997, 135-172. North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80031-3. B. Hommel, W. Prinz (Eds.).
4. Craft J.L., Simon J.R. Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970, 83:415-420. doi: 10.1037/h0028843.
5. Craik F.I.M., Govoni R., Naveh-Benjamin M., Anderson N.D. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1996, 125:159-180. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159.
6. De Houwer J. Spatial Simon effects with nonspatial responses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:49-53.
7. De Jong R., Liang C.-C., Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial, stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:731-750. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731.
8. Healy A.F., Wohldmann E.L., Sutton E.M., Bourne L.E. Specificity effects in training and transfer of speeded responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:534-546. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.534.
9. Hommel B. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1368-1384. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1368.
10. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253.
11. Logan G. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 1988, 95:492-527. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492.
12. Lu C.-H., Proctor R.W. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1995, 2:174-207.
13. Müsseler J., Wühr P., Umiltà C. Processing of irrelevant location information under dual-task conditions. Psychological Research 2006, 70:459-467. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0010-x.
14. Pashler H., Johnston J.C. Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. Attention 1998, 155-189. Psychology Press, Hove, England. H. Pashler (Ed.).
15. Proctor R.W., Lu C.-H. Processing irrelevant location information: Practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks. Memory & Cognition 1999, 27:63-77.
16. Proctor R.W., Yamaguchi M., Zhang Y., Vu K.-P.L. Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:434-445. doi: 10.1037/a0014529.
17. Salthouse T.A., Miles J.D. Aging and time-sharing aspects of executive control. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:572-582.
18. Schmeichel B.J., Baumeister R.F. Self-regulatory strength. Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications 2004, 84-98. Guilford Press, New York, NY. R.F. Baumeister, K.D. Vohs (Eds.).
19. Stürmer B., Seiss E., Leuthold H. Executive control in the Simon task: A dual-task examination of response priming and its suppression. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2005, 17:590-618. doi: 10.1080/09541440540000077.
20. Tagliabue M., Zorzi M., Umiltà C., Bassignani F. The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:648-670. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.648.
21. Vu K.-P.L., Proctor R.W., Urcuioli P. Transfer effects of incompatible location relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory Simon task. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:1146-1152.
22. Zorzi M., Umiltà C. A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research 1995, 58:193-205. doi: 10.1007/BF00419634.