The dual-task SRT procedure: Fine-tuning the timing

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 336-342

  Hsiao, Andrew T ^a   Reber, Arthur S ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RESPONSE TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SERIAL LEARNING;

EID: 0035378830     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196170     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BALDWIN, K. B., & KUTAS, M. (1997). An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. Psychophyiology, 34, 74-86.
2. CLEEREMANS, A. (1993). Mechanisms of implicit learning: Connectionist models of sequence processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. CLEEREMANS, A., & JIMÉNEZ, L. (1998). Implicit sequence learning: The truth is in the details. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 323-364). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. CLEEREMANS, A., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 235-253.
5. COHEN, A., IVRY, R. I., & KEELE, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 17-30.
6. CREAMER, L. R. (1963). Event uncertainty, psychological refractory period, and human data processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 187-194.
7. CURRAN, T. (1998). Implicit sequence learning from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: What, how and where? In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 365-400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. CURRAN, T., & KEELE, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 189-202.
9. DESTREBECQZ, A., & CLEEREMANS, A. (1999). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Unpublished manuscript.
10. EIMER, M., GOSCHKE, R., SCHLAGHECKEN, F., & STÜRMER, B. (1996). Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 970-987.
11. FRENSCH, P. A., BUCHNER, A., & LIN, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transactions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 567-584.
12. FRENSCH, P. A., LIN, J., & BUCHNER, A. (1998). Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, 61, 83-98.
13. FRENSCH, P. A., & MINER, C. S. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 95-110.
14. GRAFTON, S. T., HAZELTINE, E., & IVRY, R. [B.] (1995). Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 7, 497-510.
15. HEUER, H., & SCHMIDTKE, V. (1996). Secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 59, 176-186.
16. HSIAO, A., & REBER, A. S. (1998). The role of attention in implicit sequence learning. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 471-494). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. JIMÉNEZ, L., MENDEZ, C., & CLEEREMANS, A. (1996). Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 948-969.
18. JOLICOEUR, P. (1999). Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 87-92.
19. KEELE, S. W., IVRY, R. B., HAZELTINE, E., MAYR, U., & HEUER, H. (1999). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation: Timing in the SRT task (Tech. Rep. 98-03. Revised). Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Oregon.
20. MAYR, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 350-364.
21. NISSEN, M. J., & BULLEMER, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
22. PASHLER, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
23. RAH, S. K.-Y., REBER, A. S., & HSIAO, A. T. (2000). Another wrinkle on the dual-task SRT experiment: It's probably not dual task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 309-313.
24. REBER, P. J., & SQUIRE, L. R. (1994). Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness. Learning & Memory, 1, 217-229.
25. REED, J., & JOHNSON, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 585-594.
26. SCHMIDTKE, V., & HEUER, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 60, 53-71.
27. SHANKS, D. R., & JOHNSTONE, T. (1998). Implicit knowledge in sequential learning tasks. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 533-572). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. STADLER, M. A. (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1061-1069.
29. STADLER, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 819-827.
30. WILLINGHAM, D. B., NISSEN, M. J., & BULLEMER, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1424-1430.