The role of dynamics in stakeholder thinking

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 96, Issue , 2010, Pages 79-87

  Windsor, Duane ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Change process; Creative destruction; Dialog; Dynamics; Engagement; Networks; Participation; Reciprocity; Social construction; Sustainability value creation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875620190     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0937-3     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adrian, T., & Westerfield, M. W. (2009). Disagreement and learning in a dynamic contracting model. Review of Financial Studies, 22(10), 3873-3906.
2. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation into stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525.
3. Alkhafaji, A. F. (1989). A stakeholder approach to corporate governance: Managing in a dynamic environment. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
4. Aoki, M. (1984). The co-operative game theory of the firm. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Aoki, M. (2010). Understanding Douglass North in game-theoretic language. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21(2), 139-146.
6. Banerjee, B. (2001). Corporate citizenship and indigenous stakeholders—exploring a new dynamic of organisational-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1, 39-55.
7. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794-816.
8. Baumol, W. J. (1970). Economic dynamics: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
9. Beaulieu, S., & Pasquero, J. (2002). Reintroducing stakeholder dynamics in stakeholder thinking: A negotiated-order perspective. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 6(Summer), 53-69. (Reprinted in Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B., & Rahman S. S (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 101-118). Sheffield: Greenleaf).
10. Berman, S. L., et al. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? An empirical examination of the relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488-506.
11. Bunn, M. D., Azmi, F., & Puentes, M. (2009). Stakeholder perceptions and implications for technology marketing in multi-sector innovations: The case of intelligent transport systems. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 4(2/3), 129-148.
12. Carney, M., Shapiro, D. M., & Tang, Y. (2009a). Business group performance in China: Ownership and temporal considerations. Management and Organization Review, 5(2), 167-193.
13. Carney, S., Whitmarsh, L., Nicholson-Cole, S. A., & Shackley, S. (2009). A dynamic typology of stakeholder engagement within climate change research. Working Paper 128. Norfolk: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
14. Cerina, F. (2009). Marshall’s Ceteris Paribus in a dynamic framework. Metroeconomica,60(1), 24-53.
15. Che, J. (2009). A dynamic model of privatization with endogenous post-privatization performance. Review of Economic Studies, 76(2), 563-596.
16. Co, H. C., & Barro, F. (2009). Stakeholder theory and dynamics in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(6), 591-611.
17. Coff, R. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: Resource-based theory and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10(2), 119-133.
18. Coff, R. (2003). The emergent knowledge-based theory of competitive advantage: An evolutionary approach to integrating economics and management. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(4), 245-251.
19. Coff, R. (2010). The coevolution of rent appropriation and capability development. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 711-733.
20. Coff, R., & Blyler, M. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 677-686.
21. Coppola, M. N., Erckenbrack, D., & Ledlow, G. R. (2009). Stakeholder dynamics. In J. A. Johnson (Ed.), Health organizations: Theory, behavior, and development (Chap. 14, pp. 255-277). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
22. Crouch, C. (2006). Modelling the firm in its market and organizational environment: methodologies for studying corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies, 27(10), 1533-1551.
23. den Exter, K., & Specht, A. (2003). Assisting stakeholder decision making using system dynamics group model-building. Working paper. http://www.regional.org.au/au/apen/2003/non_refereed/108denexterk.htm.
24. Elias, A. A. (2004). Analysing the dynamics of stakeholders in the Wellington Transmission Gully Project: A systems thinking and modelling approach to environmental conflict management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
25. Elias, A. A., Cavana, R. Y., & Jackson, L. S. (2002). Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management, 32, 301-310.
26. Elias, A. A., Jackson, J. S., & Cavana, R. Y. (2004). Changing positions and interests of stakeholders in environmental conflict: A New Zealand transport infrastructure case. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 45(1), 87-104.
27. Fassin, Y. (2008). Imperfections and shortcomings of the stakeholder model’s graphical representation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 879-888.
28. Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113-135.
29. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.
30. Friedrich, C. J. (1963). Influence and the rule of anticipated reactions. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), Man and his government: An empirical theory of politics (pp. 199-215). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Frooman, J., & Murrell, A. J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: The roles of structural and demographic determinants. Business & Society, 44(1), 3-31.
32. Galai, D., & Wiener, Z. (2008). Stakeholders and the composition of the voting rights of the board of directors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(2), 107-117.
33. Gersick, C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
34. Gersick, C. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10-36.
35. Givel, M. (2006). Punctuated equilibrium in Limbo: The Tobacco Lobby and U.S. State Policy making from 1990 to 2003. Policy Studies Journal, 43(3), 405-418.
36. Harris, J. D., & Freeman, R. E. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 541-548.
37. Hayden, G. M., & Bodie, M. T. (2009). Arrow’s theorem and the exclusive shareholder franchise. Vanderbilt Law Review, 62(4), 1217-1243.
38. Heeb, J., Mauch, C., Keller, M, & Huber, F. (1999). Planning sustainable mobility with the stakeholders—a system dynamics approach. http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/1999/PAPERS/PARA35.PDF.
39. Helfat, C., et al. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
40. Hsieh, J. (2008). Toward a dynamic resource based view of strategic stakeholder management. Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1142545.
41. Huse, M. (1998). Researching the dynamics of board—stakeholder relations. Long Range Planning, 31(2), 218-226.
42. Johnson-Cramer, M., & Berman, S. (2007). A dynamic model of stakeholder management. WP 07-04. San Francisco: Santa Clara University.
43. Klumpes, P. J. M. (2003). Competition among stakeholder groups for political influence over business regulation: The case of the UK pensions industry. Economic Affairs, 23, 4-10.
44. Kujinga, K. (2004, November). The dynamics of stakeholder participation in water resources management in Zimbabwe: A case study of the agricultural sector. Unpublished MS mini-thesis, Faculty of Sciences, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
45. Lawrence, A. T. (2002). The drivers of stakeholder engagement: Reflections on the case of Royal Dutch/Shell. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 6, 71-85. [Reprinted in Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B., & Rahman, S. S. (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 185-199). Sheffield: Greenleaf].
46. Maessen, R., Van Seters, P., & Van Rijckevorsel, E. (2007). Circles of stakeholders: Towards a relational theory of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 3(1), 77-94.
47. Marshall, A. (1890/1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan.
48. Miles, M., Munilla, L., & Darroch, J. (2006). The role of strategic conversations with stakeholders in the formation of corporate social responsibility strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 195-205.
49. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
50. Mize, J. (2007). Stakeholder engagement strategies for designating New Zealand Marine reserves: A case study of the designation of the Auckland Islands (Motu Maha) Marine Reserve and Marine Reserves Designated under the Fiordland (Te Moana o Atawhenua) Marine Management Act 2005. Unpublished master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
51. Moss, S. J. (1981). An economic theory of business strategy: An essay in dynamics without equilibrium. New York: Halsted Press.
52. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
53. Papadopoulos, T., & Merali, Y. (2008). Stakeholder network dynamics and emergent trajectories of lean implementation projects: A study in the UK National Health Service. Public Money and Management, 28(1), 41-48.
54. Parent, M. M., & Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 1-23.
55. Pasquero, J. (1996). Stakeholder theory as a constructivist paradigm. In J. M. Logsdon & K. Rehbein (Eds.), 1996 Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society (pp. 548-589).
56. Payne, S., & Calton, J. M. (2002). Towards a managerial practice of stakeholder engagement: Developing multi-stakeholder learning dialogues. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 6, 37-52 [Reprinted in Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B., & Rahman, S. S. (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 121-135). Sheffield: Greenleaf].
57. Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 1(Special Winter Issue), 95-117.
58. Randel, A. E., Jaussi, K. S., & Standifird, S. S. (2009). Organizational responses to negative evaluations by external stakeholders: The role of organizational identity characteristics in organizational response reformulation. Business & Society, 48(4), 438-466.
59. Sachs, S., & Maurer, M. (2009). Toward dynamic corporate stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Supplement 3), 535-544.
60. Sachs, S., & Rühli, E. (2005). Changing managers’ values toward a broader stakeholder orientation. Corporate Governance, 5(2), 89-98.
61. Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Tywuschik, S. (2006). Stakeholder dynamics. In U. Steger (Ed.), Inside the mind of the stakeholder: The hype behind stakeholder pressure(Chap. 3, pp. 19-60). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
62. Sithole, B. (2001). Participation and stakeholder dynamics in the water reform process in Zimbabwe: The case of the Mazoe Pilot Catchment Board. African Studies Quarterly: The Online Journal for African Studies, 5(3). http://web.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v5/v5i3a2.htm.
63. Solomon, E. (2001). The dynamics of corporate change: Management’s evaluation of stakeholder characteristics. Human Systems Management, 20(3), 257-265.
64. Tarascio, V. J. (1972). A correction: On the geneology of the so-called Edgeworth-Bowley diagram. Western Economic Journal, 10, 193-197.
65. Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 171-222). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
66. Vaara, E. (1995). Linking social construction of success and stakeholder thinking. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 215-236). Helsinki: LSR-Publications.
67. White, A. L. (2006, April). The stakeholder fiduciary: CSR, governance and the future of boards. San Francisco: Business for Social Responsibility http://www.bsr.org.
68. Winn, M. I. (2001). Building stakeholder theory with a decision modeling methodology. Business & Society, 40(2), 133-168.
69. Winn, M. I., & Keller, L. R. (1999). Harnessing complexity, idiosyncrasy and time: A modeling methodology for corporate multi-stakeholder decisions. In Wood, D. J. & D. Windsor (Eds.), 1999 proceedings of the international association for business and society (pp. 482-487).
70. Winn, M. I., & Keller, L. R. (2001). A modeling methodology for multiobjective multistakeholder decisions: Implications for research. Journal of Management Inquiry,10(2), 166-181.
71. Yasmil, Y., Anshari, G. Z., Komarudin, H., & Alquadri, S. (2006). Stakeholder conflicts and forest decentralization policies in West Kalimantan: Their dynamics and implications for future forest management. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 16, 167-180.
72. Zietsma, C., & Winn, M. I. (2008). Building chains and directing flows: strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflicts. Business & Society, 47(1), 68-101.