Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: Two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 20, Issue , 2013, Pages 113-125

  Mörmann, Werner H ^a   Stawarczyk, Bogna ^b   Ender, Andreas ^a   Sener, Beatrice ^a   Attin, Thomas ^a   Mehl, Albert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

CAD CAM materials; Gloss; Gloss retention; Martens hardness; Roughness; Toothbrushing wear; Two body wear

Indexed keywords

GLOSS; GLOSS RETENTION; MARTENS HARDNESS; TOOTH BRUSHING; TWO-BODY WEARS;

ABRASIVES; ENAMELS; NANOCOMPOSITES; POLYMERS; RESINS; ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENT; SILICATES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; ZIRCONIUM;

CERAMIC MATERIALS;

AESTHETIC DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIAL; DENTAL MATERIAL; LITHIUM DISILICATE; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLYMER; SILICATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; ENAMEL; GLOSS RETENTION; MARTENS HARDNESS; MECHANICAL STRESS; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ROUGHNESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84875279822     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Baltzer A., Kaufmann-Jinoian V. VITA CAD-Temp for inLab and CEREC 3D. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2007, 10(1):99-103.
2. Bartlett D.W. Retrospective long term monitoring of tooth wear using study models. British Dental Journal 2003, 194:211-213.
3. Bindl A., Lüthy H., Mörmann W.H. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-generated slot inlay FPDs. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2003, 16:653-660.
4. Bojemüller E., Coldea A. VITA ENAMIC Technical-Scientific Documentation 2012, VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany.
5. Chen H.Y., Hickel R., Setcos J.C., Kunzelmann K.H. Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing of CAD-CAM and pressed-ceramic crowns. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1999, 82:468-475.
6. Da Costa J., Adams-Belusko A., Riley K., Ferracane J.L. The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. Journal of Dentistry 2010, 38(Suppl. 2):e123-e128. (Epub 2010 Mar 1).
7. Datzmann, G., 1996. CEREC Vitablocs Mark II machinable ceramic. In: Mörmann, W.H. (Es.), CAD/CIM in Aesthetic Dentistry; CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium, Proceedings, Chicago, Quintessence, pp. 205-215.
8. Eccles J. Tooth surface loss from abrasion, attrition and erosion. Dental Update 1982, 9:373-381.
9. Esquivel-Upshaw J.F., et al. Three years in vivo wear: core-ceramic, veneers, and enamel antagonists. Dental Materials 2012, 28:615-621.
10. Fasbinder D.J., Dennison J.B., Heys D.R., Lampe K. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM generated composite inlays. Journal of the American Dental Association 2005, 136(12):1714-1723.
11. Ferracane J.L. Resin composite-state of the art. Dental Materials 2011, 27:29-38.
12. Fischer K., Bühler-Zemp P., Völkel T. Scientific Documentation IPS e.max CAD 2011, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan.
13. Fischer J., Roeske S., Stawarczyk B., Hämmerle C.H.F. Investigations in the correlation between Martens hardness and flexural strength of composite resin restorative materials. Dental Materials Journal 2011, 29(2):188-192.
14. Giordano, R.A., 1996. Infused Ceramic Network for Fabricating Odontoforms and Dental Restorations. European Patent Application no. 95114658.8, 20.03.1996, EP 0 701 808 A2.
15. Giordano, R.A., 2000. Method for Fabricating Ceramic Network Material. United States Patent no. 6,159,417, Dec. 12, 2000.
16. Giordano, R.A., 2005. Method for Fabricating Endodontic and Direct Restorations having Infused Ceramic Network. United States Patent, US 6,881,488 B2, Apr. 19, 2005.
17. Göhring T.N., Besek M.J., Schmidlin P.R. Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro. Journal of Dentistry 2002, 30(2/3):119-127.
18. Göhring T.N., Schönenberger K.A., Lutz F. Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro. American Journal of Dentistry 2003, 16(4):275-282.
19. He Li-Hong, Swain M. A novel polymer infiltrated ceramic dental material. Dental Materials 2011, 27(6):527-534.
20. Heintze S.D., Faouzi M., Rousson V., Özcan M. Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods. Dental Materials 2012, 28:961-973.
21. Heintze S.D., Forjanic M., Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dental Materials 2006, 22:146-165.
22. ISO/TS, 14569-2, 2001. Dental Materials-Guidance on Testing of Wear-Part 2: Wear by Two/or Three Body Contact.
23. Jones C.S., Billington R.W., Pearson G.J. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. British Dental Journal 2004, 196:42-45.
24. Jung Y.S., Lee J.W., Choi Y.J., Ahn J.S., Shin S.W., Huh J.B. A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2010, 2:111-115.
25. Kelly J.R. Article analysis and evaluation: Computer-Aided Designed/Computer-Assisted Manufactured (CAD/CAM) all-ceramic crowns appear to perform better than all-composite resin crowns following the first 3 years of placement. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 2011, 11:203-205.
26. Klimek K., Hellwig E., Ahrens G. Fluoride taken up by plaque, by the underlying enamel and by clean enamel from three fluoride compounds in vitro. Caries Research 1982, 16:156-161.
27. Koutayas S.O., Vagkopoulou T., Pelekanos S., Koidis P., Strub J.R. Zirconia in dentistry; part 2. Evidence-based clinical breakthrough. European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 2009, 4(4):348-380.
28. Kramer N., Reinelt C., Richter G., Petschelt A., Frankenberger R. Nanohybrid vs. fine particle composite in class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years. Dental Materials 2009, 25:750-759.
29. Krejci I., Albert P., Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. Journal of Dental Research 1999, 78(2):713-719.
30. Krejci I., Albertoni M., Lutz F. An in-vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 2. Toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion and chemical degradation. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin 1990, 100(10):1164-1168.
31. Krejci I., Heinzmann J.L., Lutz F. The wear on enamel, amalgam and their enamel antagonists in a computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin 1990, 100(11):1285-1291.
32. Krejci I., Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin 1990, 100(12):1445-1449.
33. Krejci I., Lutz.F., Zedler C. Effect of contact area size on enamel and composite wear. Journal of Dental Research 1992, 71(7):1413-1416.
34. Krejci I., Reich T., Lutz F., Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin 1990, 100(8):953-960.
35. Kunzelmann, et al. All-Ceramics at a Glance. Introduction to Indications, Material Selection, Preparation and Insertion of All-Ceramic Restorations 2007, Society for Dental Ceramics, Ettlingen, (pp. 73-83).
36. Kurbad A., Reichel K. CAD/CAM-manufactured restorations made of lithium disilicate glass ceramics. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2005, 8:337-348.
37. Lambrechts P., Braeme M., Vuylsteke-Wauters M., Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. Journal of Dental Research 1989, 68:1752-1754.
38. Lambrechts P., Debels E., Van Landuyt K., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dental Materials 2006, 22:693-701.
39. Lee J.H., Shin S.J., Seo D.G., Park J.W., Lee J.Y. Gloss retention of nanocomposite resins after toothbrushing. Dental Materials 2010, 26(2):e132. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.094.
40. Lendenmann U., Wanner M. Tetric EvoCeram Scientific Documentation 2011, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan.
41. Lutz F., Krejci I. Amalgam substitutes: a critical analysis. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 2000, 12(3):146-159.
42. Lutz F., Krejci I., Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. Journal of Dental Research 1992, 71(8):1525-1529.
43. Magne P., Knezevic A. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence International 2009, 40(2):125-133.
44. Mehta S.B., Banerji S., Millar B.J., Suarez-Feito J.M. Current concepts on the management of tooth wear: part 1. Assessment, treatment planning and strategies for the prevention and the passive management of tooth wear. British Dental Journal 2012, 212(1):17-27.
45. Menig R., Meyers M.H., Meyers M.A., Vecchio K.S. Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical response of Hallotis rufescens (abalone) shells. Acta Materialia 2000, 48:2383-2398.
46. Mörmann W.H. The origin of the CEREC method: a personal review of the first 5 years. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2004, 7:11-24.
47. Preis V., Behr M., Handel G., Schneider-Feyrer S., Hahnel S., Rosentritt M. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2012, 10:13-22.
48. Ramfjord S.P., Ash M.M. Occlusion 1983, Saunders, Philadelphia. 3rd ed.
49. Rojas-Vizcaya F. Full zirconia fixed detachable implant-retained restorations manufactured from monolithic zirconia: clinical report after two years in service. Journal of Prosthodontics 2011, 20:570-576.
50. Rosentritt M., Preis V., Behr M., Hahnel S., Handel G., Kolbeck C. Two-body wear of dental porcelain and substructure oxide ceramics. Clinical Oral Investigations 2012, 16(3):935-943.
51. Shahdad S.A., McCabe J.F., Bull S., Rusby S., Wassell R.W. Hardness measured with traditional Vickers and Martens hardness methods. Dental Materials 2007, 23(9):1079-1085.
52. Sirona, 2011. InCoris TZI, Translucent Zirconia Ceramic Blocks for inLab. Processing Instructions: Restoration Production for Crowns and Bridges. Bensheim, Sirona Dental Systems, Order no. 6359801, D3487.
53. Stawarczyk B., Egli R., Roos M., Ozcan M., Hämmerle C.H.F. The impact of in vitro aging on the mechanical and optical properties of indirect veneering composite resins. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2011, 106(6):386-398.
54. Stawarczyk, B., Özcan, M., Schmutz, F., Trottmann, A., Roos, M., Hämmerle, C.H.F., 2013. Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 71, 102-112.
55. Suputtamongkol K., Anusavice K.J., Suchatlampong C., Sithiamnuai P., Tulapornchai C. Clinical performance and wear characteristics of veneered lithia-disilicate-based ceramic crowns. Dental Materials 2008, 24:667-673.
56. Teughels W., Van Assche N., Sliepen I., Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and or surface topography on biofilm development. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2006, 17(Suppl. 2):68-81.
57. Tinschert J., Zwez D., Marx R., Anusavice K.J. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. Journal of Dentistry 2000, 28(7):529-535.
58. Toparli M., Gokay N., Aksoy T. An investigation of temperature and stress distribution a restored maxillary second premolar tooth using a three-dimensional finite element method. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2000, 27:1077-1081.
59. Vagkopoulou T., Koutayas S.O., Koidis P., Strub J.R. Zirconia in dentistry; part 1. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 2009, 4(2):130-151.
60. Vanoorbeek S., Vandamme K., Lijnen I., Naert I. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2010, 23(3):223-230.
61. Vollbrecht J. Sirona CEREC blocs and inCoris. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2007, 10:127-134.
62. Wanner M. Scientific Documentation Telio CAD 2010, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein.
63. Wiedhahn K. From blue to white: new high-strength material for CEREC-IPS e. max CAD LT. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2007, 10:79-91.
64. Wiegand A., Schwerzmann M., Sener B., Magalhaes A.C., Roos M., Ziebolz D., Imfeld T., Attin T. Impact of toothpaste slurry abrasivity and toothbrush filament stiffness on abrasion of eroded enamel-an in vitro study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 2008, 66(4):231-235.
65. 3M ESPE, 2011. Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM Restorative Technical Product Profile. St. Paul, 3M Espe Dental Products.