Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars

Quintessence International

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 125-133

  Magne, Pascal ^a,b   Knezevic, Alena ^b,c  

^a The Don and Sybil Harrington Foundation   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Cerec; Composite resin; Endodontically treated molars; Fatigue resistance; Overlay restorations; Porcelain

Indexed keywords

OPTIBOND FL; PARADIGM MZ100; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; VITA MARK II; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 67650164668     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth.Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10: 91-93.
2. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992;18: 332-335.
3. de V Habekost L, Camacho GB, Azevedo EC, Demarco FF. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98: 186-192.
4. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87: 503-509.
5. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22: 241-249.
6. Pippin DJ, Mixson JM, Soldan-Els AP. Clinical evaluation of restored maxillary incisors: Veneers vs. PFM crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126: 1523-1529.
7. Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17: 313-317.
8. Magne P, Dietschi D, Holz J. Esthetic restorations for posterior teeth: Practical and clinical considerations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16: 104-119.
9. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Ceramic inlays: Clinical assessment and survival rate. J Adhes Dent 1999;1: 71-79.
10. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: A 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15: 122-128.
11. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.Int J Prosthodont 2004;17: 241-246.
12. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R.Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Am J Dent 2001;14: 95-99.
13. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive Metal-Free Restorations. Berlin: Quintessence, 1997.
14. Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26: 495-503.
15. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites. J Dent 2000;28: 447-452.
16. Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cuspreplacing adhesive restorations. J Dent 2006;34: 19-25.
17. Waltimo A, Könönen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101: 171-175.
18. Waltimo A, Könönen M. Maximal bite force and its association with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in young Finnish nonpatients. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53: 254-258.
19. Attia A, Abdelaziz KM, Freitag S, Kern M.Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95: 117-123.
20. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82: 167-171.
21. Kunzelmann KH, Jelen B, Mehl A, Hickel R.Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2001;4: 171-184.
22. Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: Effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23: 543-555.
23. Aberg CH, van Dijken JW, Olofsson AL. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52: 140-149.
24. Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Alkumru HN. A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2001;3: 273-283.
25. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: Dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12: 111-121.
26. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94: 511-519.
27. Sultana S, Nikaido T, Matin K, Ogata M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of resin coating on dentin bonding of resin cement in Class II cavities. Dent Mater J 2007;26: 506-513.