Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: Quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 275-284

  Göhring, Till Nicolaus ^a,b   Schönenberger, Kathrin Anna ^b   Lutz, Felix ^b  

^a University of Zurich ^*  (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMELOGEN; ARABESK; BOND 1 ADHESIVE; BOND-1 ADHESIVE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; MERZ FHC HYBRID COMPOSITE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; MONOBOND S; OPTIBOND; PERMAQUIK; PRODIGY; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; RESULCIN AQUAPRIME; SILICON DIOXIDE; SOLOBOND M; TOOTH CEMENT; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCOTCHBOND; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 19244377274     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. SSO Schweizerische Zahnärztegesellschaft. Zahnmedizinische Versorgung Schweiz. In: Berufsbild Zahnarzt 2010. Bern: Eigenverlag SSO, 1997:7-10.
2. Lutz F, Krejci I. Amalgam substitutes: A critical analysis. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12:146-59.
3. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 25D-30D.
4. Rosa BT, Perdigão J. Bond strength of nonrinsing simplified adhesive materials. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 353-358.
5. Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M. Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: Durable bonding to vital dentin. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 135-141.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshiba Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K, Pashley DH. Hybridization effectiveness of a two-step versus a three-step smear layer removing adhesive system examined correlatively by TEM and AFM. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 7-23.)
7. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1992; 16:555-562.
8. Wu J, Itoh K, Yamashita T, Tani C, Hisamitsu H, Wakamuto S. Effect of 10% phosphoric acid conditioning on the efficacy of a dentin bonding system. Dent Mater J 1998; 17:21-30.
9. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 490-95.
10. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991;7: 107-13.
11. Heys RJ, Fitzgerald M. Microleakage of three cement bases. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 55-58.
12. Douglas WH, Fundingsland JW. Microleakage of three genetically different flouride-releasing liner/bases. J Dent 1992; 20: 365-69.
13. Krejci I, Lieber CM, Lutz F. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 34-40.
14. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-9.
15. Göhring TN, Peters OA, Lutz F, Marginal adaptation of bonded slot-inlays anchoring four-unit fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 81-92.
16. Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D. The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1988; 19: 191-8.
17. Burrow MF, Hayashida M, Negishi T, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Takatsu T, Hosoda H. Tensile Bond strength and curing gap formation of a dentin bonding resin. Dent Mater 1993; 12: 97-105.
18. Krejci I, Schüpbach P, Balmelli F, Lutz F. The ultrastructure of a compomer adhesive interface in enamel and dentin and its marginal adaptation under dentinal fluid as compared with that of a composite. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 349-358.
19. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg, TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 777-784.
20. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 26-32.
21. Woitek R, Wernisch J, Wiederschwinger H. Vergleichende Untersuchunggen hinsichtlich Aushärtezeit an lichthärtenden Komposits. Z Stomatol 1993; 90: 187-201.
22. Krejci I, Lutz F, Boretti R. Resin composite polishing: filling the gap. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 490-495.
23. Hellwig E. Does advertising render dental research superfluous? Clin Oral Invest 1998; 2: 101.
24. Lutz FU, Krejci I, Besek M. Operative dentistry: The missing clinical standards. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997; 9: 541-48.