Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro

Dental Materials

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 146-165

  Heintze, S D ^a   Forjanic, M ^a   Rousson, V ^b  

^a IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG   (Liechtenstein)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Composite resins; Force; Polishing; Time

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE MATERIALS; GLOSS MEASUREMENT; MERCURY AMALGAMS; OPTICAL DEVICES; POLISHING; RESINS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

COMPOSITE RESINS; FORCE; GLOSSMETERS; TIME;

DENTAL MATERIALS;

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALUMINUM OXIDE; AMALCAP; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOGLASS; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; DENTAL ALLOY; DIAMOND; FERROUS ION; FERROUS OXIDE; GLASS IONOMER; HELIOMOLAR; INORGANIC COMPOUND; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; RUBBER; SILICON CARBIDE; SILICON DERIVATIVE; TETRIC CERAM; TETRIC EVOCERAM; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; OPTICS; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ALUMINUM OXIDE; CARBON COMPOUNDS, INORGANIC; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DIAMOND; FERROUS COMPOUNDS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; OPTICS; POLYURETHANES; RUBBER; SILICON COMPOUNDS; SOLUTIONS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; WATER;

EID: 30344483612     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. M. Morgan Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 16 2004 211 217
2. C.S. Jones, R.W. Billington, and G.J. Pearson The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations Br Dent J 196 2004 42 45
3. C.M. Bollen, P. Lambrechts, and M. Quirynen Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature Dent Mater 13 1997 258 269
4. A.F. Reis, M. Giannini, J.R. Lovadino, and G.M. Ambrosano Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins Dent Mater 19 2003 12 18
5. M. Quirynen, C.M. Bollen, W. Papaioannou, J. Van Eldere, and D. van Steenberghe The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11 1996 169 178
6. G. Willems, P. Lambrechts, M. Braem, M. Vuylsteke Wauters, and G. Vanherle The surface roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic roughness of dental resin composites J Dent Res 70 1991 1299 1305
7. I. Krejci, F. Lutz, and R. Boretti Resin composite polishing-filling the gaps Quintessence Int 30 1999 490 495
8. T. Roulet-Mehrens, and J.F. Roulet Smoke stain accumulation on restorative dental materials and hard tooth tissues after polishing with prophylaxis pastes Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 92 1982 487 496
9. J-F. Roulet, and T.K. Roulet-Mehrens The surface roughness of restorative materials and dental tissues after polishing with prophylaxis and polishing pastes J Periodontol 53 1982 257 266
10. DIN Längenprftechnik 1 Grundnormen 2000 Beuth Berlin
11. M. Jung, H. Bruegger, and J. Klimek Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing Oper Dent 28 2003 816 824
12. H. Lu, L.B. Roeder, and J.M. Powers Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites J Esthet Restor Dent 15 2003 297 303
13. L.B. Roeder, and J.M. Powers Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds Am J Dent 17 2004 109 112
14. B.A. Kaplan, G.R. Goldstein, T.V. Vijayaraghavan, and I.K. Nelson The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: a profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study J Prosthet Dent 76 1996 34 38
15. D.C. Hoelscher, A.M. Neme, F.E. Pink, and P.J. Hughes The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials Oper Dent 23 1998 36 42
16. W.H. Tate, and J.M. Powers Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers Oper Dent 21 1996 53 58
17. W.H. Tate, E.J. DeSchepper, and T. Cody Quantitative analysis of six composite polishing techniques on a hybrid composite material J Esthet Dent 4 1992 30 32
18. K.H. Chung Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites Dent Mater 10 1994 325 330
19. L.S. Turkun, and M. Turkun The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials Oper Dent 29 2004 203 211
20. J.W. Stoddard, and G.H. Johnson An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resins J Prosthet Dent 65 1991 491 495
21. J.W. van Dijken, and I.E. Ruyter Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing Acta Odontol Scand 45 1987 337 346
22. A.D. Wilder Jr, E.J. Swift Jr, K.N. May Jr, J.Y. Thompson, and R.A. McDougal Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials J Dent 28 2000 367 373
23. P.H. dos Santos, S. Consani, L. Correr Sobrinho, and M.A. Coelho Sinhoreti Effect of surface penetrating sealant on roughness of posterior composite resins Am J Dent 16 2003 197 201
24. W.W. Dodge, R.A. Dale, R.L. Cooley, and E.S. Duke Comparison of wet and dry finishing of resin composites with aluminum oxide discs Dent Mater 7 1991 18 20
25. S.B. Joniot, G.L. Gregoire, A.M. Auther, and Y.M. Roques Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins Oper Dent 25 2000 311 315
26. S. Kelbch, M. Heinz, and J. Koglin Ein neues Verfahren für schnelle, präzise und reproduzierbare Messungen von Füllstoffdispersionen in Gummi KGK Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe 56 2003 381 387
27. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Jakob G. Automatic gap detection at restoration margins with an optical Sensor in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:95-105.
28. S.S. Kohles, M.B. Clark, C.A. Brown, and J.N. Kenealy Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 2004 510 516
29. B. Al-Nawas, K.A. Grotz, H. Gotz, G. Heinrich, T.G. Rippin, T.E. Stender, H. Duschner, and W. Wagner Validation of three-dimensional surface characterising methods: scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy Scanning 23 2001 227 231
30. C. Bourauel, T. Fries, D. Drescher, and R. Plietsch Surface roughness of orthodontic wires via atomic force microscopy, laser specular reflectance, and profilometry Eur J Orthod 20 1998 79 92
31. S.A. Whitehead, A.C. Shearer, D.C. Watts, and N.H. Wilson Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture Dent Mater 15 1999 79 86
32. R. Hickel, and J. Manhart Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure J Adhes Dent 3 2001 45 64
33. N. Kramer, U. Lohbauer, and R. Frankenberger Adhesive luting of indirect restorations Am J Dent 13 2000 60D 76D
34. A.C. Meijering, N.H. Creugers, F.J. Roeters, and J. Mulder Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation J Dent 26 1998 563 568
35. M. Peumans, B. Van Meerbeek, P. Lambrechts, and G. Vanherle Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature J Dent 28 2000 163 177
36. N.H. Wilson, F.J. Burke, and I.A. Mjor Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom Quintessence Int 28 1997 245 248
37. Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators-Results of a round robin test. Dent Mater. 2005;21:304-17.
38. J.W. Van Dijken, S. Sjöström, and K. Wing The effect of different types of composite resin filling materials on marginal gingiva J Clin Periodontol 14 1987 185 189
39. M. Quirynen, and C.M. Bollen The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature J Clin Periodontol 22 1995 1 14
40. M. Schätzle, N.P. Lang, A. Anerud, H. Boysen, W. Burgin, and H. Löe The influence of margins of restorations of the periodontal tissues over 26 years J Clin Periodontol 28 2001 57 64
41. J.W. van Dijken, and S. Sjöström Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite Clin Oral Investig 2 1998 180 183
42. M.A. Brunsvold, and J.J. Lane The prevalence of overhanging dental restorations and their relationship to periodontal disease J Clin Periodontol 17 1990 67 72
43. N.P. Lang, R.A. Kiel, and K. Anderhalden Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins J Clin Periodontol 10 1983 563 578