Stability and change in markers of core numerical competencies

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 141, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 649-666

  Reeve, Robert ^a   Reynolds, Fiona ^a   Humberstone, Judi ^a   Butterworth, Brian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Core number; Dot enumeration; Number comparison

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REACTION TIME;

AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84874624256     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0027520     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Akin, O., & Chase, W. (1978). Quantification of three-dimensional structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 397-410. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.397
2. Ansari, D. (2010). Neurocognitive approaches to developmental disorders of numerical and mathematical cognition: The perils of neglecting development. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 123-129. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.06.001
3. Ansari, D., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Atypical trajectories of number development: A neuroconstructivist perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 511-516. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02040-5
4. Ansari, D., Price, G., & Holloway, I. (2010). Typical and atypical development of basic numerical magnitude representations: A review of behavioral and neuroimaging studies. In M. Ferrari & L. Vuletic (Eds.), The developmental relations among mind, brain and education (pp. 105-127). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3666-7_5
5. Arp, S., & Fagard, J. (2005). What impairs subitizing in cerebral palsied children? Developmental Psychobiology, 47, 89-102. doi:10.1002/dev.20069
6. Arp, S., Taranne, P., & Fagard, J. (2006). Global perception of small numerosities (subitizing) in cerebral-palsied children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 405-419. doi:10.1080/13803390590935426
7. Bachot, J., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Roeyers, H. (2005). Number sense in children with visuospatial disabilities: Orientation of the mental number line. Psychology Science, 47, 172-183.
8. Baker, S., Gersten, R., Flojo, J., Katz, R., Chard, D., & Clarke, B. (2002). Preventing mathematics difficulties in young children: Focus on effective screening of early number sense delays (Tech. Rep. No. 0305). Eugene, OR: Pacific Institutes for Research.
9. Balakrishnan, J. D., & Ashby, F. G. (1991). Is subitizing a unique numerical ability? Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 555-564. doi:10.3758/BF03207540
10. Balakrishnan, J. D., & Ashby, F. G. (1992). Subitizing: Magical numbers or mere superstition? Psychological Research, 54, 80-90. doi:10.1007/BF00937136
11. Basak, C., & Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Subitizing speed, subitizing range, counting speed, the Stroop effect, and aging: Capacity differences, speed equivalence. Psychology and Aging, 18, 240-249. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.240
12. Berch, D. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333-339. doi:10.1177/00222194050380040901
13. Brannon, E. M. (2006). The representation of numerical magnitude. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 222-229. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.002
14. Bruandet, M., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004). A cognitive characterization of dyscalculia in Turner syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 42, 288-298. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.007
15. Bull, R., Johnston, R. S., & Roy, J. A. (1999). Exploring the roles of the visual-spatial sketch pad and central executive in children's arithmetical skills: Views from cognition and developmental neuropsychology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 15, 421-442.
16. Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London, England: Macmillan.
17. Butterworth, B. (2003). Dyscalculia screener. London, England: NFER Nelson.
18. Butterworth, B. (2005a). Developmental dyscalculia. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 455-467). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
19. Butterworth, B. (2005b). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 3-18. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00374.x
20. Butterworth, B. (2010). Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 534-541. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.007
21. Butterworth, B., Varma, S., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332, 1049-1053. doi:10.1126/science.1201536
22. Chard, D., Clarke, B., Baker, S., Otterstedt, J., Braun, D., & Katz, R. (2005). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 3-14. doi:10.1177/073724770503000202
23. Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P. F., & Dehaene, S. (1999). Differential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 617-630. doi:10.1162/089892999563689
24. Cipolotti, L., Butterworth, B., & Denes, G. (1991). A specific deficit for numbers in a case of dense acalculia. Brain, 114, 2619-2637. doi:10.1093/brain/114.6.2619
25. Clarke, B., & Shinn, M. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33, 234-248.
26. Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of Weber-Fechner's law: Neuronal recordings reveal a logarithmic scale for number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 145-147. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00055-X
28. Dehaene, S., Molko, N., & Cohen, L. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 218-224. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008
29. Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.4.39010.1080/02643290244000239
30. De Smedt, B., Swillen, A., Devriendt, K., Fryns, J. P., Verschaffel, L., & Ghesquiere, P. (2007). Mathematical disabilities in children with velocardio-facial syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 45, 885-895. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.024
31. Desoete, A., Ceulemans, A., De Weerdt, F., & Pieters S. (2010). Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and nonsymbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Education Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1348/2044-8279.002002
32. Desoete, A., Ceulemans, A., Roeyers, H., & Huylebroeck, A. (2009). Subitizing or counting as possible screening variables for learning disabilities in mathematics education or learning? Educational Research Review, 4, 55-66. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.003
33. Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A. (2004). Children with mathematics learning disabilities in Belgium. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 50-61. doi:10.1177/00222194040370010601
34. Duncan, E., & McFarland, C. (1980). Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additivefactors analysis. Memory & Cognition, 8, 612-622. doi:10.3758/BF03213781
35. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307-314. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
36. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2001). DMDX (Version 2.9.01) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.u.arizona.edu/Universal-GreekwithMathPi.-1.H11011jforster/dmdx.htm
37. Fuson, K. (1998). Pedagogical, mathematical, and real-world conceptual-support nets: A model for building children's multidigit domain knowledge. Mathematical Cognition, 4, 147-186. doi:10.1080/135467998387370
38. Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43-74. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90050-R
39. Geary, D. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 345-362. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.345
40. Geary, D. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1539-1552. doi:10.1037/a0025510
41. Geary, D. C., & Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398-406.
42. Geary, D., Hamson, C., & Hoard, M. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236-263. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2561
43. Geary, D., Hoard, M., & Hamson, C. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: Patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for a mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 213-239. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2515
44. Geary, D., Hoard, M., Nugent, L., & Byrd-Craven, L. (2007). Strategy use, long-term memory, and working memory capacity. In D. Berch & M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 83-105). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
45. Geary, D. C., & Lin, J. (1996). Numerical cognition: Age-related differences in the speed of executing biologically primary and biologically secondary processes. Experimental Aging Research, 24, 101-137.
46. Gersten, R., Jordan, N., & Flojo, J. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293-304. doi:10.1177/00222194050380040301
47. Girelli, L., Lucangeli, D., & Butterworth, B. (2000). The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 104-122. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2564
48. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534-537.
49. Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R. S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine & Child Neuropsychology, 38, 25-33. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15029.x
50. Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665-668. doi:10.1038/nature07246
51. Holloway, I. D., & Ansari, D. (2009). Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: The numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 17-29. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.001
52. Iuculano, T., Tang, J., Hall, C., & Butterworth, B. (2008). Core information processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia and low numeracy. Developmental Science, 11, 669-680. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00716.x
53. Jordan, N. C., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. G. (1992). Differential calculation abilities in young children from middle and low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 28, 644-653. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.4.644
54. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Nabors Olah, L., & Locuniak, M. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153-175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00862.x
55. Kail, R. V., & Ferrer, E. (2007). Processing speed in childhood and adolescence: Longitudinal models for examining developmental change. Child Development, 78, 1760-1770.
56. Koontz, K. L., & Berch, D. B. (1996). Identifying simple numerical stimuli: Processing inefficiencies exhibited by arithmetic learning disabled children. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 1-24. doi:10.1080/135467996387525
57. Kosc, L. (1974). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 165-177. doi:10.1177/002221947400700309
58. Kovas, Y., Harlaar, N., Petrill, S., & Plomin, R. (2005). "Generalist genes" and mathematics in 7-year-old twins. Intelligence, 33, 473-489. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.05.002
59. Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8-9year olds. Cognition, 93, 99-125. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004
60. Laski, E. V., & Siegler, R. S. (2007). Is 27 a big number? Correlational and causal connections among numerical categorization, number line estimation, and numerical magnitude comparison. Child Development, 78, 1723-1743. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01087.x
61. Lemer, C., Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., & Cohen, L. (2003). Approximate quantities and exact number words: Dissociable systems. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1942-1958. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00123-4
62. Locuniak, M., & Jordan, N. (2008). Using kindergarten number sense to predict calculation fluency in second grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 451-459. doi:0.1177/0022219408321126
63. Logan, G., & Zbrodoff, J. (2003). Subitizing and similarity: Toward a pattern-matching theory of enumeration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 676-682. doi:10.3758/BF03196531
64. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2003). Comparing latent class factor analysis with traditional factor analysis for data mining. In Bozdogan, H. (Ed.), Statistical data mining and knowledge discovery (pp. 373-383). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9780203497159.ch22
65. Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29-47). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
66. Mazzocco, M. M. M., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2011). Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). Child Development, 82, 1224-1237. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01608.x
67. Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Hanich, L. B. (2010). Math achievement, numerical processing, and executive functions in girls with Turner syndrome: Do girls with Turner syndrome have math learning disability? Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 70-81. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.011
68. Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Thompson, R. (2005). Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 142-155. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00129.x
69. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520. doi:10.1038/2151519a0
70. Mussolin, C., Mejias, S., & Noël, M. P. (2010). Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia. Cognition, 115, 10-25. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.006
71. Notelaers, G., Einarsen, S., De Witte, H., & Vermunt, J. (2006). Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach. Work & Stress, 20, 289-302. doi:10.1080/02678370601071594
72. Paterson, S., Girelli, L., Butterworth, B., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2006). Are numerical impairments syndrome specific? Evidence from Williams syndrome and Down's syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 190-204. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01460.x
73. Piazza, M., Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Berteletti, I., Conte, S., Lucangeli, D., Zorzi, M. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116, 33-41. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.012
74. Piazza, M., Giacomini, E., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2003). Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270, 1237-1245. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2356
75. Piazza, M., Mechelli, A., Butterworth, B., & Price, C. J. (2002). Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes? NeuroImage, 15, 435-446. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0980
76. Price, G., Holloway, I., Räsänen, P., Vesterinen, M., & Ansari, D. (2007). Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dyscalculia. Current Biology, 17, R1042-R1043. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.013
77. Raghubar, K., Barnes, F., & Hecht, S. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 110-122. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.005
78. Rasmussen, E. R., Neuman, R. J., Heath, A. C., Levy, F., Hay, D. A., & Todd, R. D. (2004). Familial clustering of latent class and DSM-IV defined attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtypes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 589-598. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00248.x
79. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1986). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. London, England: Lewis.
80. Rosengren, K., & Braswell, G. (2001). Variability in children's reasoning. In H. Reese & R. Kail (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 1-40). New York, NY: Academic Press.
81. Rousselle, L., & Noël, M. (2007). Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs. nonsymbolic number magnitude. Cognition, 102, 361-395. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.005
82. Rubinsten, O., Henik, A., Berger, A., & Shahar-Shalev, S. (2002). The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 74-92. doi:10.1006/jecp.2001.2645
83. Rueckert, L., Lange, N., Partiot, A., Appollonio, I., Litvar, I., Le Bihan, D., & Grafman, J. (1996). Visualizing cortical activation during mental calculation with functional MRI. NeuroImage, 3, 97-103. doi:10.1006/nimg.1996.0011
84. Salthouse, T. A., & Davis, H. P. (2006). Organization of cognitive abilities and neuropsychological variables across the lifespan. Developmental Review, 26, 31-54.
85. Schleifer, P., & Landerl, K. (2011). Subitizing and counting in typical and atypical development. Developmental Science, 14, 280-291. doi:10.1111/j.1467.2010.00976.x
86. Sekuler, R., & Mierkiewicz, D. (1977). Children's judgments of numerical inequality. Child Development, 48, 630-633. doi:10.2307/1128664
87. Shalev, R., Manor, O., Auerbach, J., & Gross-Tsur, V. (1998). Persistence of developmental dyscalculia: What counts? Results from a three year prospective follow-up study. Journal of Pediatrics, 133, 358-362. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70269-0
88. Shalev, R., Manor, O., & Gross-Tsur, V. (1997). Neuropsychological aspects of developmental dyscalculia. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 105-120. doi:10.1080/135467997387434
89. Shalev, R., Manor, O., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 121-125. doi:10.1017/S0012162205000216
90. Silver, C., Pennett, D., Black, J., Fair, G., & Balise, R. (1999). Stability of arithmetic disability subtypes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 108-119. doi:10.1177/002221949903200202
91. Simon, T. J., Bearden, C. E., McDonald-McGinn, D., & Zackai, E. (2005). Visuospatial and numerical cognitive deficits in children with chromosome 22Q11.2 deletion syndrome. Cortex, 41, 145-155. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70889-X
92. Simon, T. J., Takarae, Y., DeBoer, T., McDonald-McGinn, D. M., Zackai, E. H., & Ross, J. L. (2008). Overlapping numerical cognition impairments in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion or Turner syndromes. Neuropsychologia, 46, 82-94. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.016
93. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and student achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417
94. Stock, P., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2010). Detecting children with arithmetic disabilities from kindergarten: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study on the role of preparatory arithmetic abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 250-268. doi:10.1177/0022219409345011
95. Svenson, O., & Sjoberg, K. (1983). Speeds of subitizing and counting processes in different age groups. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 142, 203-211.
96. Trick, L., Enns, J., & Brodeur, D. (1996). Life span changes in visual enumeration: The number discrimination task. Developmental Psychology, 32, 925-932. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.925
97. Trick, L., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331-351. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.2.331
98. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.80
99. Tuholski, S., Engle, R., & Baylis, G. (2001). Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration. Memory & Cognition, 29, 484-492. doi:10.3758/BF03196399
100. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2000). Latent GOLD 2.0 user's guide [Software manual]. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.
101. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2003). Addendum to the Latent GOLD user's guide: Upgrade manual for Version 3.0 [Software manual]. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.
102. Vetter, P., Butterworth, B., & Bahrami, B. (2011). A candidate for the attentional bottleneck: Set-size specific modulation of the right TPJ during attentive enumeration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 728-736. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21472
103. von Aster, M., & Shalev, R. (2007). Number development and developmental dyscalculia. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49, 868-873. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00868.x
104. Watson, D., Maylor, E., & Bruce, L. (2005). The efficiency of featurebased subsidization and counting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1449-1462. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1449
105. Weinert, F., & Helmke, A. (1998). The neglected role of individual differences in theoretical models of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 8, 309-323. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00024-8
106. Wender, K., & Rothkegel, R. (2000). Subitizing and its subprocesses. Psychological Research, 64, 81-92. doi:10.1007/s004260000021