Subitizing and its subprocesses

Psychological Research

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 81-92

  Wender, Karl F ^a   Rothkegel, Rainer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034567657     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004260000021     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Balakrishnan, J. D., & Ashby, F. G. (1991). Is subitizing a unique numerical ability? Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 555-564.
2. Balakrishnan, J. D., & Ashby, F. G. (1992). Subitizing: magical numbers or mere superstition? Psychological Research, 54, 80-90.
3. Davis, H., & Pérusse, R. (1988). Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 561-615.
4. Folk, C. L., Egeth, H. E., & Kwak, H. (1988). Subitizing: direct apprehension or serial processing? Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 313-320.
5. Jevons, W. S. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination. Nature, 3, 281-282.
6. Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
7. Klahr, D. (1973). A production system for counting, subitizing, and adding. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 527-546). New York: Academic Press.
8. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 476-490.
9. Lorinstein, B., & Haber, R. N. (1975). Perceived numerosity: an information processing analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 224-236.
10. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1-22.
11. Murofushi, K. (1997). Numerical matching behavior by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): subitizing and analogue magnitude estimation. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 140-153.
12. Oyama, T., Kikuchi, T., & Ichihara, S. (1981). Span of attention, backward masking, and reaction time. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 106-112.
13. Pashler, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Prinz, W. (1966). Quantitative Versuche über die Prägnanz von Punktmustern [Quantitative experiments on the preciseness of dot patterns]. Psychologische Forschung, 29, 297-359.
15. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985). Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation. Perception, 14, 619-628.
16. Saltzman, I. J., & Garner, W. R. (1948). Reaction time as a measure of span of attention. Journal of Psychology, 25, 227-241.
17. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
18. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74 (whole no. 11).
19. Treisman, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255, 114B-125.
20. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331-351.
21. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Cueing and counting: does the position of the attentional focus affect enumeration? Visual Cognition, 1, 67-100.
22. Wolters, G., Van Kempen, H., & Wijlhuizen, G. J. (1987). Quantification of small numbers of dots: subitizing or pattern recognition? American Journal of Psychology, 100, 225-237.