Getting more from morphology in multilingual dependency parsing

NAACL HLT 2012 - 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 315-326

  Hohensee, Matt ^a   Bender, Emily M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY PARSER; DEPENDENCY PARSING; FEATURES SETS; MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES; SETS OF FEATURES; TREEBANKS;

MORPHOLOGY;

EID: 84874612646     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. I. Aduriz, M.J. Aranzabe, J.M. Arriola, A. Atutxa, A.D. de Ilarraza, A. Garmendia, and M. Oronoz. 2003. Construction of a Basque dependency treebank. In Proc. of the Second Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2003), pages 201-204.
2. S. Afonso, E. Bick, R. Haber, and D. Santos. 2002. Floresta Sintá(c)tica: A treebank for Portuguese. In Proc. of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002), page 1698.
3. G. Attardi, F. DellOrletta, M. Simi, A. Chanev, and M. Ciaramita. 2007. Multilingual dependency parsing and domain adaptation using DeSR. In Proc. of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007), pages 1112-1118.
4. D. Bamman and G. Crane. 2006. The design and use of a Latin dependency treebank. In Proc. of the Fifth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2006), pages 67-78.
5. D. Bamman, F. Mambrini, and G. Crane. 2009. An ownership model of annotation: The Ancient Greek Dependency Treebank. In Proc. of the Eighth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT8), pages 5-15.
6. E.M. Bender. 2011. On achieving and evaluating language-independence in NLP. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology: Special Issue on Interaction of Linguistics and Computational Linguistics, 6(3):1-26.
7. K. Bengoetxea and K. Gojenola. 2010. Application of different techniques to dependency parsing of Basque. In Proc. of the First Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages (SPMRL 2010), pages 31-39. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. R. Bhatt, B. Narasimhan, M. Palmer, O. Rambow, D.M. Sharma, and F. Xia. 2009. A multi-representational and multi-layered treebank for Hindi/Urdu. In Proc. of the Third Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW III), pages 186-189. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. E. Bick. 2006. LingPars, a linguistically inspired, language-independent machine learner for dependency treebanks. In Proc. of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLLX), pages 171-175. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. S. Bird, E. Klein, and E. Loper. 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python. O'Reilly Media.
11. C. Bosco, V. Lombardo, D. Vassallo, and L. Lesmo. 2000. Building a treebank for Italian: a data-driven annotation schema. In Proc. of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2000), pages 99-106.
12. T. Brants, W. Skut, and H. Uszkoreit. 1999. Syntactic annotation of a German newspaper corpus. Treebanks: Building and using parsed corpora, 20:73.
13. S. Buchholz and E. Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proc. of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 149-164. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. X. Carreras, M. Surdeanu, and L. Marquez. 2006. Projective dependency parsing with perceptron. In Proc. of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 181-185. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. M.W. Chang, Q. Do, and D. Roth. 2006. A pipeline model for bottom-up dependency parsing. In Proc. of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 186-190. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. G.G. Corbett. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge University Press.
17. S. Džeroski, T. Erjavec, N. Ledinek, P. Pajas, Z. Žabokrtsky, and A. Žele. 2006. Towards a Slovene dependency treebank. In Proc. of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006).
18. G. Eryiʇit, J. Nivre, and K. Oflazer. 2008. Dependency parsing of Turkish. Computational Linguistics, 34(3):357-389.
19. Y. Goldberg and M. Elhadad. 2009. Hebrew dependency parsing: Initial results. In Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT'09), pages 129-133. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Y. Goldberg and M. Elhadad. 2010. Easy-first dependency parsing of Modern Hebrew. In Proc. of the First Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages (SPMRL 2010), pages 103-107. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Yoav Goldberg. 2011. Automatic Syntactic Processing of Modern Hebrew. Ph.D. thesis, Ben Gurion University.
22. J. Hajic, O. Smrz, P. Zemánek, J. Šnaidauf, and E. Beška. 2004. Prague Arabic dependency treebank: Development in data and tools. In Proc. of the NEMLAR International Conference on Arabic Language Resources and Tools, pages 110-117.
23. Jan Hajič. 1998. Building a syntactically annotated corpus: The Prague Dependency Treebank. In Eva Hajičová, editor, Issues of Valency and Meaning: Studies in Honor of Jarmila Panevová, pages 12-19. Prague Karolinum, Charles University Press.
24. Katri Haverinen, Timo Viljanen, Veronika Laippala, Samuel Kohonen, Filip Ginter, and Tapio Salakoski. 2010. Treebanking Finnish. In Proc. of the Ninth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT9, volume 9, pages 79-90.
25. M. Hohensee. 2012. It's only morpho-logical: Modeling agreement in cross-linguistic dependency parsing. Master's thesis, University of Washington.
26. M.T. Kromann. 2003. The Danish Dependency Treebank and the DTAG treebank tool. In Proc. of the Second Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2003), pages 217-220.
27. M.P. Marcus, M.A. Marcinkiewicz, and B. Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
28. M.A. Marti, M. Taulé, L. Márquez, and M. Bertran. 2007. CESS-ECE: A multilingual and multilevel annotated corpus.
29. Y. Marton, N. Habash, and O. Rambow. 2010. Improving Arabic dependency parsing with lexical and inflectional morphological features. In Proc. of the First Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages (SPMRL 2010), pages 13-21. Association for Computational Linguistics.
30. R. McDonald, K. Lerman, and F. Pereira. 2006. Multilingual dependency analysis with a two-stage discriminative parser. In Proc. of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLLX), pages 216-220. Association for Computational Linguistics.
31. T. Nakagawa. 2007. Multilingual dependency parsing using global features. In Proc. of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007), pages 952-956.
32. J. Nivre, J. Hall, and J. Nilsson. 2006a. Maltparser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proc. of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), volume 6, pages 2216-2219.
33. J. Nivre, J. Hall, J. Nilsson, G. Eryiʇit, and S. Marinov. 2006b. Labeled pseudo-projective dependency parsing with support vector machines. In Proc. of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 221-225. Association for Computational Linguistics.
34. J. Nivre, J. Hall, S. Kübler, R. McDonald, J. Nilsson, S. Riedel, and D. Yuret. 2007. CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In Proc. of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007). Association for Computational Linguistics.
35. J. Nivre, I.M. Boguslavsky, and L.L. Iomdin. 2008. Parsing the SynTagRus treebank of Russian. In Proc. of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2008), volume 1, pages 641-648. Association for Computational Linguistics.
36. J. Nivre. 2009. Parsing Indian languages with Malt- Parser. In Proc. of the Seventh International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON 2009) NLP Tools Contest, pages 12-18.
37. K. Oflazer, B. Say, D.Z. Hakkani-Tür, and G. Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. Text, Speech, and Language Technology, pages 261-277.
38. L. Øvrelid and J. Nivre. 2007. When word order and part-of-speech tags are not enough-Swedish dependency parsing with rich linguistic features. In Proc. of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP), pages 447-451.
39. S. Petrov, D. Das, and R. McDonald. 2011. A universal part-of-speech tagset. Arxiv preprint ArXiv:1104.2086.
40. Loganathan Ramasamy and Zdeněk Žabokrtský. 2011. Tamil dependency parsing: Results using rule based and corpus based approaches. In Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLING 2011), volume 1, pages 82-95, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer- Verlag.
41. M. Schiehlen and K. Spranger. 2007. Global learning of labelled dependency trees. In Proc. of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007), pages 1156-1160.
42. Anna Siewierska. 1998. Variation in major constituent order: A global and a European perspective. In Anna Siewierska, editor, Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe, pages 475-551. Mouton De Gruyter.
43. K. Simov, P. Osenova, A. Simov, and M. Kouylekov. 2004. Design and implementation of the Bulgarian HPSG-based treebank. Research on Language & Computation, 2(4):495-522.
44. I. Titov and J. Henderson. 2007. Fast and robust multilingual dependency parsing with a generative latent variable model. In Proc. of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007), pages 947-951.
45. L. Van der Beek, G. Bouma, R. Malouf, and G. Van Noord. 2002. The Alpino dependency treebank. Language and Computers, 45(1):8-22.
46. V. Vincze, D. Szauter, A. Almási, G. Móra, Z. Alexin, and J. Csirik. 2010. Hungarian dependency treebank. In Proc. of the Seventh Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010).
47. N. Xue, F. Xia, F.D. Chiou, and M. Palmer. 2005. The Penn Chinese Treebank: Phrase structure annotation of a large corpus. Natural Language Engineering, 11(2):207-238.