When word order and part-of-speech tags are not enough - Swedish dependency parsing with rich linguistic features

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn 2007-January, Issue , 2007, Pages 447-451

  Øvrelid, Lilja ^a   Nivre, Joakim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Data driven parsing; Dependency parsing; Error analysis; Grammatical relations; Linguistic features; Treebanks

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SYNTACTICS;

DATA DRIVEN; DATA-DRIVEN PARSING; DEPENDENCY PARSING; GRAMMATICAL FUNCTIONS; GRAMMATICAL RELATIONS; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; PART-OF-SPEECH TAGS; SWEDISHS; TREEBANKS; WORD ORDERS;

ERROR ANALYSIS;

EID: 52149121003     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. J. Aissen. Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21:435-483, 2003.
2. D. M. Bikel. Intricacies of Collins' parsing model. Computational Linguistics, 30(4):479-511, 2004.
3. R. Bod. Beyond Grammar. CSLI Publications. University of Chicago Press, 1998.
4. S. Buchholz. Memory-Based Grammatical Relation Finding. PhD thesis, Tilburg University, 2002.
5. S. Buchholz and E. Marsi. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 149-164, 2006.
6. J. Carroll and E. Briscoe. High precision extraction of grammatical relations. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 134-140, 2002.
7. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. Libsvm: A library for Support Vector Machines. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm, 2001.
8. E. Charniak and M. Johnson. Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 173-180, 2005.
9. Ö. Dahl and K. Fraurud. Animacy in grammar and discourse. In T. Fretheim and J. K. Gundel, editors, Reference and referent accessibility, pages 47-65. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1996.
10. D. Klein and C. D. Manning. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 423-430, 2003.
11. S. Kübler and J. Prokić. Why is German dependency parsing more reliable than constituent parsing? In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 7-18, 2006.
12. B. Megyesi. Shallow parsing with PoS taggers and linguistic features. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:639-668, 2002.
13. J. Nivre, J. Hall, and J. Nilsson. MaltParser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 2216-2219, 2006.
14. J. Nivre, J. Nilsson, and J. Hall. Talbanken05: A Swedish treebank with phrase structure and dependency annotation. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2006), Genoa, Italy, May 24-26 2006.
15. J. Nivre, J. Nilsson, J. Hall, G. Eryiʇit, and S. Marinov. Labeled pseudo-projective dependency parsing with Support Vector Machines. In Proceedings of the tenth conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), 2006.
16. L. Øvrelid. Towards robust animacy classification using morphosyntactic distributional features. In Proceedings of the EACL 2006 Student Research Workshop, Trento, Italy, 2006.
17. A. Weber and K. Müller. Word order variation in German main clauses: A corpus analysis. In Proceedings of the 20th International conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 71-77, 2004.