CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing

CoNLL 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 149-164

  Buchholz, Sabine ^a   Marsi, Erwin ^b  

^a TOSHIBA CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATION SCHEME; DATA SET; DEPENDENCY PARSER; DEPENDENCY PARSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE LEARNING; PERFORMANCE; TREEBANKS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84914138451     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. A. Arun and F. Keller. 2005. Lexicalization in crosslinguistic probabilistic parsing: The case of French. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL.
2. D. Bikel. 2002. Design of a multi-lingual, parallel-processing statistical parsing engine. In Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conf. (HLT).
3. E. Black, S. Abney, D. Flickenger, et al. 1991. A procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars. In Speech and Natural Language: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Pacific Grove, California.
4. E. Black, F. Jelinek, J. Lafferty, D. Magerman, R. Mercer, and S. Roukos. 1993. Towards history-based grammars: Using richer models for probabilistic parsing. In Proc. of the 31rd Annual Meeting of the ACL.
5. S. Buchholz and D. Green. 2006. Quality control of treebanks: documenting, converting, patching. In LREC 2006 workshop on Quality assurance and quality measurement for language and speech resources.
6. A. Chanev, K. Simov, P. Osenova, and S. Marinov. 2006. Dependency conversion and parsing of the BulTreeBank. In Proc. of the LREC-Workshop Merging and Layering Linguistic Information.
7. Y. Cheng, M. Asahara, and Y. Matsumoto. 2005. Chinese deterministic dependency analyzer: Examining effects of global features and root node finder. In Proc. of SIGHAN-2005.
8. Y.J. Chu and T.H. Liu. 1965. On the shortest arborescence of a directed graph. Science Sinica, 14:1396–1400.
9. M. Collins, J. Hajic, L. Ramshaw, and C. Tillmann. 1999. A statistical parser for Czech. In Proc. of the 37th Annual Meeting of the ACL.
10. M. Collins. 1996. A new statistical parser based on bigram lexical dependencies. In Proc. of the 34th Annual Meeting of the ACL.
11. M. Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proc. of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL.
12. M. Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
13. B. Cowan and M. Collins. 2005. Morphology and reranking for the statistical parsing of Spanish. In Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP).
14. D. Csendes, J. Csirik, and T. Gyimóthy. 2004. The Szeged corpus: a POS tagged and syntactically annotated Hungarian natural language corpus. In Proc. of the 5th Intern. Workshop on Linguistically Interpreteted Corpora (LINC).
15. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, P. Berck, and S. Gillis. 1996. MBT: A memory-based part of speech tagger-generator. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Very Large Corpora (VLC).
16. A. Dubey and F. Keller. 2003. Probabilistic parsing for German using sister-head dependencies. In Proc. of the 41st Annual Meeting of the ACL.
17. J. Edmonds. 1967. Optimum branchings. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 71B:233–240.
18. J. Einarsson. 1976. Talbankens skriftspråkskonkordans.
19. J. Eisner. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proc. of the 16th Intern. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 340–345.
20. D. Elworthy. 2000. A finite-state parser with dependency structure output. In Proc. of the 6th Intern. Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT).
21. H. Gaifman. 1965. Dependency systems and phrase-structure systems. Information and Control, 8:304–337.
22. D. Hays. 1964. Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations. Language, 40:511–525.
23. R. Hudson. 1984. Word Grammar. Blackwell.
24. T. Kudo and Y. Matsumoto. 2000. Japanese dependency structure analysis based on support vector machines. In Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora (EMNLP/VLC).
25. S. Kurohashi and M. Nagao. 1994. KN parser: Japanese dependency/case structure analyzer. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Sharable Natural Language, pages 48–55.
26. S. Kurohashi and M. Nagao. 1997. Kyoto University text corpus project. In Proc. of the 5th Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP), pages 115–118.
27. Y. Lepage, S. Ando, S. Akamine, and H. Iida. 1998. An annotated corpus in Japanese using Tesnière’s structural syntax. In ACL-COLING Workshop on Processing of Dependency-Based Grammars, pages 109–115.
28. D. Lin. 1995. A dependency-based method for evaluating broad-coverage parsers. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).
29. D. Magerman. 1995. Statistical decision-tree models for parsing. In Proc. of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 276–283.
30. M. Marcus, G. Kim, M. Marcinkiewicz, R. Mac-Intyre, A. Bies, M. Ferguson, K. Katz, and B. Schasberger. 1994. The Penn treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure. In Proc. of the Workshop on Human Language Technology (HLT).
31. S. Marinov and J. Nivre. 2005. A data-driven dependency parser for Bulgarian. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 89–100.
32. R. McDonald and F. Pereira. 2006. Online learning of approximate dependency parsing algorithms. In Proc. of the 11th Conf. of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL).
33. R. McDonald, K. Crammer, and F. Pereira. 2005a. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL.
34. R. McDonald, F. Pereira, K. Ribarov, and J. Hajic. 2005b. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP).
35. I. Mel’čuk. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. The SUNY Press, Albany, N.Y.
36. J. Nivre and J. Nilsson. 2005. Pseudo-projective dependency parsing. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 99–106.
37. J. Nivre and M. Scholz. 2004. Deterministic dependency parsing of English text. In Proc. of the 20th Intern. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 64–70.
38. J. Nivre, J. Hall, and J. Nilsson. 2004. Memory-based dependency parsing. In Proc. of the 8th Conf. on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 49–56.
39. K. Oflazer. 1999. Dependency parsing with an extended finite state approach. In Proc. of the 37th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 254–260.
40. G. Sampson. 1995. English for the Computer: The SUSANNE Corpus and analytic scheme. Clarendon Press.
41. K. Sima’an, A. Itai, Y. Winter, A. Altman, and N. Nativ. 2001. Building a tree-bank of modern Hebrew text. In Journal Traitement Automatique des Langues (t.a.l.) — Special Issue on Natural Language Processing and Corpus Linguistics.
42. D. Sleator and D. Temperley. 1993. Parsing English with a link grammar. In Proc. of the 3rd Intern. Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT).
43. P. Tapanainen and T. Järvinen. 1997. A non-projective dependency parser. In Proc. of the 5th Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP).
44. U. Teleman, 1974. Manual för grammatisk beskrivning av talad och skriven svenska (MAMBA).
45. L. Tesnière. 1959. Elément de syntaxe structurale. Klincksieck, Paris.
46. H. Yamada and Y. Matsumoto. 2003. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. In Proc. of the 8th Intern. Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), pages 195–206.